Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Josh Hamilton's Unique Public Statement On His Addiction

RIP - Patrick Sharp Point Streak: Huet and Blackhawks beat Predators 3-1

Well - that really wasn't the team I hate to see the Blackhawks play against.  Eddie-O mentioned it about half way through the 3rd period but with their current struggles the Predators can't play their normal physical style.  Having Jordin Tootoo, one of their leading pests and hitters out doesn't help them keep that normal tempo but nothing was really going to the Predators way tonight.  Their passes weren't sharp and they seemed hesitant to shoot. 

Of course once again the Blackhawks played an all-around solid game and took away just about every chance the Predators had anyway.  This is the kind of game we've been talking about when we say Huet really won't "cost" the team anything when the 5 guys in front of him play their best. 

And that's not to take away anything Huet, who had a good game.  He came up huge right off the bat with a save off Jason Arnott's first shot of the game.  Duncan Keith may have gotten a piece of the pass but Huet was right where he needed to be to take away what looked like it could be the first goal of the night.  Later in the night Huet showed a quick glove - knocking away a re-direct from J.P. Dumont just a few feet out.  A solid game from Huet who would have had his first shutout of the year had it not been for Niklas Hjalmarsson's skate knocking in a puck for the second game in a row... and a lucky post towards the end of the game.

On the other end of the ice we saw Pekka Rinne improve his game, just not well enough.  Dustin Byfuglien has continued his great start to the year and put himself in front of the net on the Hawk's first power play and knocked home the rebound to start the scoring.  I've read more than one criticism of Byfuglien that gets on him for not showing emotion, especially after he scores, so I guess he's going to try something now but all he could think of was that one outstretched-arms move Scott Stapp does in every Creed video... I'd go back to the drawing board on that one there.  Not even 30 seconds later, the Hawks dented the twine again.  This time the play started when the Hawks lost a draw  but Jack Skille fights in the corner and forces a turnover which is picked up by Colin Fraser, knocked over to Tomas Kopecky and the Hawks were up two. 

Tell me if this sounds familiar though, the puck is kept in the offensive zone on a great move by a Hawk blue liner.  It then ends up on Toews' stick who dishes it to another charging player who knocks it home.  This time it was Seabrook on the blue line and Toews pushed it to a charging Keith who fired a rocket to finish off the scoring. This play can happen every game and I don't think I'll get sick of it, you?

Stray Observations:

  • CORSI Numbers are here.  Brent Seabrook had a very solid game and his +9 shows it.  
  • Sam wanted me to mention that despite all the noise about how the Hawks can't win anything with this team... they're on pace for 128 points... not that they'll actually keep up this pace of course. 
  • Foley's story on Waite's re-programming of Huet really made it sound like he's read all the comments around the internets and was trying to offer a defense of Cristobal. 
  • What will get you drunker - drinking every time Toews wins a battle along the boards?  Or drinking every time Toews wins a face off (60.3%)? 
  • How horribly sexist is this "Hockey 101" thing?  "For ladies only"?  I've heard plenty of morons with a dick that could use a little refresher on the basics of this sport.
  • The Blackhawks once again dominated the shot totals - taking 30 while allowing only 13, including just 2 in the third period.  They can't score if you don't let them shoot. 
  • The totals for faceoffs were much closer but the Blackhawks once again took the edge.  The only weak link tonight was Madden who went 2 for 8.  Toews won 60%, Bolland won 59% and Kopecky won 100%.  Fraser didn't win any though.
  • Finally, Brent Sopel led the team with 5 blocked shots, including one that may have prevented a goal on the Predators first power play.  

Player of the Game:

Biscuit once again had a solid physical game - he absolutely destroyed a Predator who was in almost alone one Huet (Chris Hansen would be proud).  He also factored in on the first and final goals of the game and continues to improve his game.  Plus, it gives me a chance to run the picture with the mustache again.

Seabrookstache_medium

Blackhawks vs Predators coverage

Comment 78 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

the look on their faces says:

“What is that, Cris?”
“I think that’s our fans … giving us props!”
“What are props? Can you smoke them?”
“…”

by gmh on Oct 16, 2009 1:48 AM CDT reply actions  

It looked to me like

they were saying, “Hey Huet, don’t you think our Ice Skanks are better than theirs?”

SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon

by burpchelischili on Oct 16, 2009 7:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

That picture

belongs on To Catch a Pedator.
Nothing like a disturbing stache.

twitter.com/kaner88

by Original Six on Oct 16, 2009 2:15 AM CDT reply actions  

While Huet kinda showed what he can do

I’ll feel a little better seeing him do it against a good offensive team. Next Wednesday vs. Vancouver might be the next good test.

Coach Q was quoted as saying this in the AP recap tonight:

"He got a good win," Quenneville said. "He handled the puck well. I think it helped him and it helped us. There is no problem with Huet. I do not anticipate changing goaltenders."

However, he also pointed out during a pregame interview all the back-to-back games the Hawks have this year, and said both goalies will see plenty of starts. If Niemi can continue to show the poise he showed Wednesday, we may see a bit of a 1A/1B situation until the Olympic break.

Chicagoan in the Lou.

by Mike Martin on Oct 16, 2009 4:57 AM CDT reply actions  

How the hell did Colin Fraser end up with a -5 on the CORSI numbers. I only got to catch the highlights, but was he a non-factoror just on the ice for short-handed opportunities?

by warrenjm2006 on Oct 16, 2009 7:39 AM CDT reply actions  

It wasn't that close

…since the opening bed-crapping against Calgary, the Hawks have strung together an impressive 170 minutes.

2 shots against in the 3rd period. Wha! It’s like the Hawks tucked Nashville in all snug with a warm glass of milk and assured ’em everything would be ok. I hesitate to point out the team that used to do this to the Hawks.

If Keith thinks his shit don’t stink, it’s because his head is so far away from his ass. The goal was textbook (great plays by Seebs and Toews too.) Following up on the theme, Madden then read a similar play to Keith, who set up Kane for another “glorius opportunity”.

Three two-way centers and (now) maybe four d-men who could reach 10-15 goals. Muahh!

Crazy as it sounds, the Hawks may feel a bit snakebit through seven games. How many pucks have gone in off our guys? How many big saves (except for shoot-out) have our goalies made? Granted, we’ve enjoyed a couple musical pipe clangers, but…

At the other end, we really haven’t benefitted from fluky goals and, to take just one example, Brouwer alone has been stoned on three or four “glorious opportunities” this year, probably equalling what our guys have done in net.

Oh yeah, no Hossa yet.

Pinch me.

by cliffkoroll on Oct 16, 2009 8:24 AM CDT reply actions  

11 points in 7 games

and we don’t even have Jimmy Chitwood yet!

Not that I’m ready to crown us champions of anything yet by any means, but we’re adding a 40-goal scorer in a few weeks. I seem to find myself saying that after these first five 2-pointers…‘this lineup doesn’t even have Hossa yet’. Which then makes me think of the past 10-12 dreadful years, being named the worst organ-I-zation in sports, going to games in college when there was 9,000 fans in the UC, and it coming full circle to today…it’s a pitiful circle of emotion I go through.

"What the hell, let's review it." - Dale Tallon
"They are!" - Pat Foley
"What a farce." - Dale Tallon

by HawkVision on Oct 16, 2009 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Think I saw a stat flash up that this is our best start since 82-83 or something silly. I mean, it’s very early yet still to start forecasting outcomes based on just these few games. But good work boys.

by ChicoMaki on Oct 16, 2009 11:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Looking good

Hey like it has been said, if the D doesn’t allow shots or scoring opprutunities, no goals will be scored. Simple enough.

Oh and my man crush for Seabrook is continuing to grow.

On top of Hammer looking like a stud lately, I think Soupy is in line for some very early season pats on the back.

jt

by HolyBlackhawksBatman on Oct 16, 2009 8:58 AM CDT reply actions  

I’m glad someone gave 51 some credit, he’s generate a lot of offensive opportunites skating the puck up the ice. Pairing him with hammer is great.

I think it sometimes takes the d-men (not named seabrook or keith) a little bit of time to get in sync with each other. It appears to be happening with soup & hammer, hopefully sopel and barker will work together a bit more so barker can pinch up to us his cannon without immediately giving up an odd man rush the other way.

by SLoop on Oct 16, 2009 10:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

At little bit late but..

I completely agree, the only thing that scares me about our 3rd line D is that they are damn slow compared to the other lines. Though I think they will gel just fine in due time.

jt

by HolyBlackhawksBatman on Oct 21, 2009 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Agreed

It seems they’re more likely to take chances and play more offensively when he’s in net vs. Niemi (no nickname?).

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on Oct 16, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

I find myself calling him “Auntie Em”

by K_Dog on Oct 16, 2009 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

restraning order out for Hjalmarsson

Nick Hjalmarsson should get a restraning order to stay 10 away from the net. Gooo Hawks.

by redtribe14 on Oct 16, 2009 9:34 AM CDT reply actions  

Seriously.

We’ll have to develop a game plan to defend his skate from scoring.

"What the hell, let's review it." - Dale Tallon
"They are!" - Pat Foley
"What a farce." - Dale Tallon

by HawkVision on Oct 16, 2009 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

Foley's insight on Huet explains a lot

As a regular negative commenter on Huet, I think Foley gave me some answers I was looking for.

Huet is playing with less confidence and sharpness this year than he did last year. Rather than being an A- goalie, he seemed to have fallen to a C- or worse at the beginning of this season. And it is clear now why that may be the case.

 How can you take a 34 year old goalie and tell him he has to radically change his style without forcing him to think more than react? During Huet’s tenure in Montreal, he was coached to go into the butterfly and move laterally in the crease while on the ice. This is the style he seemed to play last year, and while he was beaten high at times, it happens nowhere near as frequently as it has this season.

Hawks goalie coach Waite is trying to teach him to stay up when going from side to side and fall to the butterfly when he needs to make a low save. Imagine if you were Huet now, with the pressure of being the #1 guy, being coached to reinvent his crease mechanics….

I am willing to give Huet some deference now, and hope that he either successfully makes the transition, or if it is deemed that the experiment is a failure, that the coaches just allow him to return to his older style of play, letting him return to a comfort zone where he can react rather than think then react.

That all being said, last night was at best a confidence booster for him, albeit against what may be the most anemic offense in the NHL right now. Tomorrow night will be a truer test of his readiness. and he had better be ready – I invested some bucks for some sweet seats in 327 for that game, and I would sure like to see him play well.

by Return of the Roar on Oct 16, 2009 9:52 AM CDT reply actions  

seeing goals differently

Even though it took foley like 10 (game) minutes to finish his point, I’m glad he did.

A good example of Huet thinking now as opposed to reacting would be Iginla’s breakaway goal on monday. Huet barely reacted at all and Iginla got an easy 5 hole goal. You could practically see the gears grinding in Huet’s head as Iginla skated in. This could just be revisionist history on my part, but did anyone else notice this?

This certainly is an issue and I hope Waite has fully evaluated the pros and cons of this change.

"If you're scared, go buy a dog" - Stacey King

by Hack on Oct 16, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Montreal coaching style

This definitely explains a lot. You have goalies like Theodore, Huet and now Carey Price (who has struggled mightly) dropping to their knees quicker than a hooker on Cicero. Hopefully Huet can get to the point where he doesn’t have think and just react to make the save. Also, booing him is not going to help because there isn’t help coming through a trade and to rely on Niemi at this point is not going to get us where we need to go.

"It's a dog eat dog world and I'm wearing Milk-Bone underwear" - Norm Peterson

by bigmic on Oct 16, 2009 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Glad you brought that up

I know nothing about the art and science of goaltending, but doesn’t it seem odd for a guy to climb to the level of World Class starting goalie, only to have a coach say to you “hey Cris, we need to talk…I’m thinking you need to change your whole style of play” ?

This is probably akin to a pro golfer trying to change his swing mechanics: possible, but not easy and definitely takes some time to adjust.

by K_Dog on Oct 16, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

caption for the photo

hey Brent come here………is it me or do those flat pads make Niemi’s ass look fat?

"If you're scared, go buy a dog" - Stacey King

by Hack on Oct 16, 2009 10:32 AM CDT reply actions  

Well, I still don't think they're playing as well as they can

at least for a whole 60 min. Not that they aren’t good, they are. It’s just that I see greatness, but only for a few minutes here and there (a lot of few minutes).

Then again, it’s early in the season, can’t imagine how great the games are going to get.

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on Oct 16, 2009 10:35 AM CDT reply actions  

Huet and the Blackhawks?

Let’s not get all lovey-dovey and hop aboard the Huet train after a solid performance were he stopped 12 shots…for the whole game, not a period, for the whole game so let’s try to keep all things in perspective shall we?
Never thought I ‘d see the day that a $5.6 million goaltender would have to re-invent his game due to the fact that the goaltender coach (and the organization as well) thought his mechanics weren’t good enough to be successful throughout the NHL season. which is far from a ringing endorsement for Huet. The fact that it looks like Huet has more work to do on his game than Neimi, frankly, is startling to say the least and NO the team does not perform better with Huet in net they just play air-tight defence in front of Huet for they do not feel confident enough that Huet will make the big save when they need him to.
Did he make a big save all night? One could argue the save off of a deflected shot late in the 3rd but he did leave the rebound at the feet of Steve Sullivan, all due to the fact he couldn’t catch the puck (a reoccuring problem with Huet) other than that there really any other opportunities that Huet had thwarted.
All in all a positive performance from Huet for at least for one game this season showed that he can provide the netminding the Hawks hoped he could provide and that’s just to be solid and that he was tonight. This performance doesn’t mean he’s out of the woods yet for another sub-standard performance (either Saturday or Wednesday) will have Huet facing the same predicament as he did tonight…play well or get ready to ride the pine.

It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!

by hawks61 on Oct 16, 2009 11:01 AM CDT reply actions  

Yes,Thank You!

I completely agree. This game showed nothing about Huet, it showed how tight our defense is. Sopel had 5 blocked shots, almost the same amount of saves Huet made. That glove smack on the tip late in the game happened because he was out of position. Every one is babying him now, even the commentators, turning text book saves into a thing of heroics. This kind of play will work against an offense like the Preds, but what about a team that can score? In fact, the Preds should have put a few pucks in the net but blew it on their own accord. That first big save was nice, but it also seemed to be in slow motion, due to an ineffective offense. However, to give credit on that save, it is tough to keep your leg down like that when sliding backwards and across. Well done Huet.
The Hawks look sickly good, Campbell is playing a shit ton better than last year and Keith is a god ( he makes no errors ). Kane has lost his fear of being hit and Buf is playing some great hockey. There is nothing wrong with this team with the exception of Goaltending.
I can’t believe a $5.6 million goaltender has to completely change his style in order to be effective.

by Puckpowwow.com on Oct 16, 2009 11:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

2 pts. are 2pts no matter how you achieve them.

That certainly wasn’t the most entertaining performance, but on the road that is precisely what the Hawks were looking for. An air-tight defensive game with little chances going each way and that is what happened as the Hawks shutdown the Predators to an incredible 13 shots..13 shots for the whole game! The Predators must have thought they were in a time warp or something having them traveled back into the year 2000. It’s been a while since I’ve seen an NHL team get completely shutdown to the point were they could only amass 13 shots…in their own barn to boot. That my friends was a defensive gem.
Great stuff and hopefully it continues on Saturday against the Stars.

It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!

by hawks61 on Oct 16, 2009 11:14 AM CDT reply actions  

Huet's "issues" are between his ears - not between the pipes

I have to agree that it wouldn’t be an average request to ask a $5.6 mil. NHL goalie to change his net mechanics so he can make more saves. If I’m Huet I’d be asking “What the fuck did you guys think you were getting when you signed me?”

Creating whatever net mechanics he has began a very long time ago in a galaxy far, far away and he’s proven to a plethora of coaching staff, scouts, teammates, owners, fans, hot chicks, uncle Dick’s cousin’s brother who actually played Junior ‘A’, and yes, experts on this site (maybe the one or two that are left in his camp anyway), that he’s got more than enough skills to be where he’s at and earning whatever he’s pocketing.

Baby steps (very different than “babying”), and if that means starting with 13 shots allowed, and apparently we can limit it to that with an opponent like last night, then great. This won’t be the case very often in this league though. But on that note, if we aren’t willing to tread a little lightly with wherever the bejesus his ego is right now, let’s just stamp a ‘return to sender’ on his forehead and drop him in the mail.

He’s got the skills. He needs to go get drunk for a week or something, hey, I don’t know what works for this guy. But I’m pretty sure he’s one of those players that a team loses faith in, trades away, and then eats large fucking crow every time he comes back to town for the next 4 years (P. Roy – and no, I sure as hell am not putting them in the same category… just making a point).

"Call Detroit, tell dem... BULLSHIT!"

by Hungryhawk on Oct 16, 2009 11:41 AM CDT reply actions  

All people are idiots, except for the ones that I don’t think are idiots.

by ChicoMaki on Oct 16, 2009 11:43 AM CDT reply actions  

I disagree

"Call Detroit, tell dem... BULLSHIT!"

by Hungryhawk on Oct 16, 2009 11:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

:P

"Call Detroit, tell dem... BULLSHIT!"

by Hungryhawk on Oct 16, 2009 12:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Huet

I hate to get on this topic because Im tired of hereing Huet this Huet that. There is a reason he is still here and not let go. I know its because of his contract, but look at it this way. Do you really think the Panguins Goalie was really that good when they won the cup. As long as the offense and defense does the job which I think they are doing their job and they only will be getting better, then Huet just needs to focus. Also want to add, last year he did not play a full season. So I would not be hateing so fast. And as always, DETRIOT SUXS!!! DETRIOT SUXS!!

by redtribe14 on Oct 16, 2009 12:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Spell check, dude

Spell. Check.

www.secondcityhockey.com

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

by McClure on Oct 16, 2009 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not that draft position guarantees anything, but yeah, I think most people thought Marc-Andre Fleury was a pretty good goaltender even before Pittsburgh won the Cup.

by Dr. Ice on Oct 16, 2009 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Spell Check?

Who cares!!! as long as the point is across. Please check my spelling on this one. lolol, and grade me.

by redtribe14 on Oct 16, 2009 12:23 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Your spelling was better.

Punctuation, however, could use a lot of work.

Got more soul than a sock with a hole.

by chrome on Oct 16, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think the Chicago Fire should start scouting Hjallmerson the way he’s kicking pucks in the net lately.

by G8K33P3R on Oct 16, 2009 12:31 PM CDT reply actions  

C'mon man.

It’s the nature of this site to bitch hard and steady on something. Currently there’s not TOO much else to gripe about, although it is only October. Let’s flog the mule ’til it draws flies.

"Call Detroit, tell dem... BULLSHIT!"

by Hungryhawk on Oct 16, 2009 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

Flog the Mule??

Franzen is out until April already…. Although it couldn’t hurt to whip him bloddy

by Roos-34 on Oct 16, 2009 12:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Nope

I read “whip him bloddy” and I liked it!

SHOOOOOOOT IT!!!! Anon

by burpchelischili on Oct 16, 2009 7:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Does it

give more of a Russian/Eastern block accent to it ala Ivan Drago?

by Roos-34 on Oct 17, 2009 4:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

rec'd

"Call Detroit, tell dem... BULLSHIT!"

by Hungryhawk on Oct 16, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Teams

I think The divison would be alot better without Nashville and Columbus in it. I just hate seeing teams that don’t belong in the NHL. They should have looked at Wisconsin for a team before freakin Nashville or Columbus or even AZ!

by redtribe14 on Oct 16, 2009 12:35 PM CDT reply actions  

Or Hartford.

Got more soul than a sock with a hole.

by chrome on Oct 16, 2009 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Columbus is a good market

They just needed a playoff berth last season to rejuvinate their fans base, which was excellent for the first few years, so don’t include Columbus in the arguement. Nashville is pathetic, there’s no way to put it or go around it and should be moved to another location in either Canada or Seattle. Anywhere but there but that’s an arguement for another day.
Reasons why there are teams in Glendale and Nashville? The same reasons why the Hawks started the season in Finland – to grow the game. Unfortunately, the NHL has a commissioner that is unwilling to admit that he has made some colosal errors in judgement, hence the fiasco that insued this summer over the ownership of the Coyotes.
But I do agree as I posted for the pre-game yesterday that there are 3 games that I could care less about and all 3 include the Hawks playing in the Country Music City.

It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!

by hawks61 on Oct 16, 2009 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

All that I see...absolute horror

Did anyone notice that with about 5 minutes to go Nashville starting playing Metallica’s One over the PA. Was it to fire them up, or to make a statement about the maximum number of goals they can score in a game?

by Hendershot35 on Oct 16, 2009 12:45 PM CDT reply actions  

Yes

I noticed and started head banging. Couldn’t figure out the significance. Now I get it. :)

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on Oct 16, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

was there

and the entire crowd yelling shoot in unison, literally every person

hilarious

by flyinglotus on Oct 16, 2009 12:48 PM CDT reply actions  

As in...

Shoot ’em up! Head ’em out! Head ’em out! Shoot ’em up! Yipee Yay Rawhiiiiiiiiide!” ?

"Call Detroit, tell dem... BULLSHIT!"

by Hungryhawk on Oct 16, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

My blistering analysis:

1) Good game
2) Our team rocks
3) In many respects, Huet had a pretty easy night, but he won and that’s all that matters
4) NHL Center GameCenter Live is much improved over last year, but (and this may sound odd) eliminating the commercials and going dark in between periods is kind of bothersome
5) I kind of liked Dustin’s “I am a golden god!” moment after he took out the trash
6) I bought tickets to both games in Vancouver for when the Hawks come to town

by HawkInExile on Oct 16, 2009 1:03 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

If you missed Exile's #5...

…go back up and read it. Coffee on keyboard stuff.

by cliffkoroll on Oct 16, 2009 1:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've been wondering...

when did Brouwer turn into such a bad motherfucker?

Got more soul than a sock with a hole.

by chrome on Oct 16, 2009 1:07 PM CDT reply actions  

As soon as he realized

he couldn’t put home a puck in an open net. He probably figured if i want to stay on this team i better do something and i can’t even score on an open net.

hey look the net’s wide open. ohmygodohmygodohmygod CRAP, missed again

by Roos-34 on Oct 16, 2009 1:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe he got that advice from Buff or Madden.

I wouldn’t be surprised to see Brouwer start converting this season. He’s still generating scoring chances, though now playing with less skilled offensive players, often because he’s made it a point to be one of the most active players on the ice each shift.

I’m rooting for him. Perhaps he’ll never find the scoring touch in the NHL he had in the AHL, but I can respect any player who’s giving the visible effort we’ve seen out of Brouwer this year.

Got more soul than a sock with a hole.

by chrome on Oct 16, 2009 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

totally random...

… just looking at the standings, i know it’s very early but, i can’t help but feel a little bit sorry for JHC

by SLoop on Oct 16, 2009 1:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Stop it Right There!

Win a Cup before step one down that road.

by cliffkoroll on Oct 16, 2009 1:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Now, I know it's been 7 games

But remember the Buff for Nylander trade we were clamoring for last year? thank god that didn’t happen

by illinikc33 on Oct 16, 2009 1:29 PM CDT reply actions  

Stephane Waite

Why did I get the feeling that I was being “sold” a solid Huet performance last night? The “BIG SAVE!!!” on the first shot felt a little forced and the Stephane Waite story seemed a bit out of place. Don’t get me wrong, the Arnott stop was a nice save but it was hardly going to make the plays of the week.

Let me get this straight – we’re blaming Montreal for Huet’s problems in net now? Didn’t Stephane Waite have all last season to work on changing Huet’s style? Sounds to me like this was a talking point in the production meetings before the game last night.

Huet certainly looked better last night and hopefully he will build upon a nice win, but face facts – when only facing about 20 shots a night BOTH goalies should be putting up healthy numbers.

by JKline3 on Oct 16, 2009 1:31 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Agreed

Maybe reading too many hockey blogs has turned me into a conspiracy theorist but I thought the same thing. All i could think was that John McDonough was hard at work trying to figure out a way to spin this thing in the other direction. I also thought it was kind of odd how Pat had to get that story in before the end of the second period. It all seemed a little contrived.

by Hendershot35 on Oct 16, 2009 1:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Now that you mention it...

…there was a consistent, “united front-type” message throughout the broadcast.

Speaking of spinning this thing in the other direction, did anyone notice Campbell, open ice to his left, executing an ill-timed spin-o-rama to the right directly into a defender?

When you’re kicking teams’ asses, that sort of shit is cute and funny.

by cliffkoroll on Oct 16, 2009 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Glad I'm not the only one who felt that way

It would seem that if they were taking such drastic measures, one of the beat reporters would have made a story out of it. Perhaps an email to Kuc or Sassone is in order to see if this was ever mentioned to them prior to last night.

www.secondcityhockey.com

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

by McClure on Oct 16, 2009 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good point...

With all the questions about Huet you would certainly think that this would have been reported earlier. With that kind of contract, you would hope that minimal tweaking would be needed, let alone a major overhaul. Kinda big news.

by JKline3 on Oct 16, 2009 2:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

Hockey 101

Yes, I thought that was incredibly sexist. However, I’ll have to check into attending. Then come up with some awesome question. Like, how do you get the hockey players to marry you? Or, is the UC kept cold so you can see my nips?

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on Oct 16, 2009 2:16 PM CDT reply actions  

Boobs

I vote for any question relating to boobs.

by XxMJ20xX on Oct 16, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions  

Or....

You could twist the cold question to see if Edzo recommends against Brazilians due to the cold temps.

www.secondcityhockey.com

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

by McClure on Oct 16, 2009 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

HAHA

OK, these three are winners of course.

I entered, will let you all know if I get picked so we (the nurse type of we: You) can come up with some great questions.

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on Oct 16, 2009 4:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great!

I would just like to see Eddie’s reaction and subsequent answer.

"What the hell, let's review it." - Dale Tallon
"They are!" - Pat Foley
"What a farce." - Dale Tallon

by HawkVision on Oct 17, 2009 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

well

if its anything like the dopes who ask question at conventions then the questions will probably be “What’s Patrick Kane’s favorite food?!”

by TJ3117 on Oct 16, 2009 3:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

spin- o -rama worth 7.3 mil???

I guess in his contract it stated that he must do a spin-o-rama every game along with everything else. How many spin-o-rama’s does he have to do to equal 7.3 mil. ????

by redtribe14 on Oct 16, 2009 5:34 PM CDT reply actions  

7.3 per game

GO BLACKHAWKS
Witness to Mark Buehrle's perfect game July 23, 2009

by chisoxfan1473 on Oct 16, 2009 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SBN's source for all things Chicago Blackhawks. Online home of The Committed Indian. Please don't take this place seriously.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aylettcaterstickwith_small
On The Road Again
Aylettcaterstickwith_small
It's All Mememe
Harris__hawks_2_small
Badgerdano'd
Aylettcaterstickwith_small
Les Vacances de M.Huet

Recent FanPosts

Ice_small
New Thread Feb 4
Small
Anybody who plays in rec leagues needs to watch this
Tron_toews_2
Playoff Contenders and Pretenders Predictions (Updated)
Micky_ward_wiki__micky_ward_pics_2_small
All Gloves Are Off: Potential?
Small
Febuary 18th, Columbus
Tron_toews_2
Contenders from Pretenders

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triumvirate of Stupid

Photo_11_small Killion

34548_409975644603_503814603_4258799_6800286_n_small SamFels

Chicago_flag_small McClure

Actual Intelligence

Airstaff_waddle250_small Hack

Morning Links

Gatorfly_small JuliaM

Secondcity_hockey_small Second City Southpaw

Moderator

Vertical_hold_2_small Skags

H121125a_small SKeen

Zombiepanda_small ahnfire

Cartman_hawk2_small stacie7