Monday's Bits
So we haven't had a chance to talk about this much, but that's all right because he hasn't taken the ice yet, but this pick up of Andrew Ebbett is rather intriguing. First of all, judging by the Ducks' blogs, they aren't all that thrilled to lose him. Secondly, this is a guy who saw some time on the Ducks' second line last year, though that has a little to do with a lack of depth at the position last season in SoCal. It's also an admission that the Hawks 4th line just hasn't been nearly effective as it was last year, and means that Ben Eager is a long, long way from coming back (and with concussions, he should be extra careful. I don't want him drooling on himself by the age of 40. Though maybe he does anyway). Kuc is reporting that Skille can put the I-pass away. It also may mean the Hawks are ready to admit Dave Bolland is hurt and needs time. Fabulous Weapon has just not been effective so far, and isn't moving well. He's small, but pretty quick, and 32 points in 48 games last year is hard to ignore. If he plays well, there'll be an even bigger logjam at forward when Hossa, Eager, and eventually Burish come back. But when Tomas Kopecky does anything to justify his existence, I'll worry then.
-Couldn't be more delighted that Brouwer finally got on the scoresheet Saturday night, because he's been just this side of awesome this season. Brouwer gets a lot of shit from Hawks fans for his stone hands at the wrong times, but for anyone who actually bother to really watch the game, they'll have noticed Brouwer has been everywhere. He's a step quicker this year, and has always been in the right place at the right time. For me, when the Hawks decide to make a move, this makes Buff the easiest to part with, because Brouwer could fill that role just as well, and maybe even better.
-It's time we admit we can't do anything better than The Fifth Feather. Read their last two entries, and tell me if there's one incorrect syllable in any of them. I'll have more thoughts on the Huet-situation later today, methinks.
0 recs |
24 comments
|
Comments
today's practice
Bolland skated, but you can tell he’s not 100%. Ebbett skated, I noticed him more because I didn’t recognize the skater then for him doing anything that special. After the main practice, Toews shot pucks at Niemi for a while at one end. At the other end of the rink Ladd & Kopecky worked with Huet on stopping 2nd rebounds/pucks slipping through with goalie coach. They know it’s a weakness and are trying to fix it.
http://twitter.com/hawksfansince08
by hawksfansince08 on Oct 19, 2009 2:54 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
thanks man! (da)
…ALWAYS lookin for practice/scrimmage reports….it never seems to get covered (whats wrong with people?!?)…
sorry bout the situation at home…i don’t know HOW you live with that man…
by WirtzGMnomore on Oct 20, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You really don't get those reports lately
You get sudden goalie/Huet experts who want to fart their opinion on the “Hawks goalie situation” every fucking day. Beat reporters need to get back to covering the Goddamn team, and not sit down in front of their computers and think, “hmmm, what angle do I take today about Huet’s goaltending and salary?”
"What the hell, let's review it." - Dale Tallon
"They are!" - Pat Foley
"What a farce." - Dale Tallon
by HawkVision on Oct 20, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't disagree
with anything 5th feather said…All I’m saying is that Q should give Niemi more starts than just spelling Huet on back to back games…the sky is not falling. we’re not fucked. we’re still going to make the playoffs…but just in case, giving Niemi a handful more starts than first anticipated might payoff if the worst occurs
by HawkInExile on Oct 19, 2009 3:33 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Good to see our unpaid
Hawk bloggers making better, and more intelligent points than the paid “gurus” in the fairly major media outlets. These geniuses better remember, Huet isn’t Rex Grossman or Milton Bradley. Yeah, it’s fun to write the easier and sexier story to the audience of casual bandwagoners who love to bitch bitch bitch all the livelong day. But how about taking the position that requires some neurological activity rather than something like sending him to Rockford to “figure things out”.
And what the fuck is that, “figure things out”!? ‘Ya know, I went to Rockford and I figured out how to stop a puck! Holy shit! Look out NHL, here I come again!’ Huet is still an NHL goalie, he doesn’t need to “figure things out”, it’s not like Rockford is a rehab facility or a find-yourself retreat. We’re eight games into the Goddamn season…can the gurus please refrain from pressing…no, slamming the panic button for just a wee bit longer. Christ!
"What the hell, let's review it." - Dale Tallon
"They are!" - Pat Foley
"What a farce." - Dale Tallon
by HawkVision on Oct 19, 2009 3:45 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
@dkurtenbach at Blackhawks Examiner made an excellent point
Say we sent Huet down to Rockford to “figure things out”, and maybe he DOES. Maybe his stats improve, his game gets better— and if he gets recalled, what are the chances that all other teams will pass up a half-price goalie with an improved game so that we actually keep our #1 goalie? (Source)
Goddamn the haters. I’m headed to the Blackhawks store and getting myself a Huet shirt to wear for good juju.
by chiblackhawks on Oct 19, 2009 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
And only a day after Fifth Feather made the exact same point.
by Dr. Ice on Oct 19, 2009 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunno
I see the argument (read the article at Fifth), but I just don’t think a 5.6 mill goalie, playing well in the AHL, would make other GMs bite. If Huet made 1 or even 2 million I’d worry a bit, or if he had just one year left on his contract, but Detroit has cap problems of their own, and St Louis actually has a fairly solid tandem in Mason/Conklin, a tandem that doesn’t get significantly better by spelling in Huet for one of them. Nashville can’t spend money, and Columbus is just fine. I just don’t see it. But, as to their point over there, I also didn’t see Havlat being anointed with the crown of thorns, either.
by ChicoMaki on Oct 20, 2009 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Brouwer could fill Buff's role?
I’ll agree that Brouwer is better defensively than Buff, but I don’t see how you can possibly think it would be easy to part with the big man because Brou finally got a goal. Buff’s looked as good if not better than his playoff performance last year, and Brouwer certainly doesn’t provide the butt-in-the-goalie’s face presence that Buff does. Buff’s got more points, better hands (yes he does—Brouwer deserves the crap he gets for his stone hands), and has shown himself to be a force in the playoffs. Nothing against Brouwer, but why is everyone STILL so anxious to get rid of Buff?
by Preacher000 on Oct 19, 2009 3:47 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank you
I am with you on this one 100%. The only good thing about trading Buff is that he is good and has a higher salary. But at this point, he would probably get you a pretty decent player in return, who would probably also have a 2mil+ salary. At this point, I would hold on to Buff for sure.
by DudeMcnude on Oct 19, 2009 4:39 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don't think we're anxious to get rid of Buff now
but looking at the cap situation, our SCH writers are merely pointing out who would be easiest to part with. (because you know, it’ll happen.)
by chiblackhawks on Oct 19, 2009 4:40 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll admit
I’m one of the ones giving Brouwer crap about missing open nets.
I have noticed him answering the call against Iginla, taking out 2 panes of glass so far and also being all over the ice physically.
Doesn’t mean I will excuse him for missing open nets though
by Roos-34 on Oct 19, 2009 3:53 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Excellent Feather Write-Up
Sassone’s perspective from one year ago provides perfect perspective. But don’t beat yourself up Sam. You guys can’t control the comments here, and even over there, you see panic-button pushers and even the obligatory swipe at Soup in the comments.
Plus, while the analysis is spot-on, and the farm report in-depth, where is the lighter touch? Where’s my Tallon planner? And nicknames: “Ham Sandwich” is not in the same league as the richly-allusive “Super Nintendo.”
Keep on truckin’ boys!
by cliffkoroll on Oct 19, 2009 4:04 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
This site tastes better. mmmm beeer
"Youuuu Suck, Mayyyyers!!"
by Tiocfaidh ar La on Oct 19, 2009 6:37 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lets pummel Vancouver (again...)
Madden is a stud (duh.). Skille had some serious snarl Saturday night. And I think I came up with a good idea for the goalie situation, play Niemi at home games and Huet on the road…until he gets his confidence back.
Victim was found murdered by a Chelsea Dagger.
by pucknut on Oct 19, 2009 7:06 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Huet - Niemi
Yes, there is a Goalie controversy. Trying to teach a Goalie thats been around a while to re-learn technique and style at this point is a daunting task. Gotta balance the rotation and lean towards the streaking Goaltender NOW, not towards playoff time. Watch all oponents snipe his weak glove side over and over and also coax him into the inherent butterfly style that he will NOT shake anytime soon. Old habits….
Let’s get Niemi developed quickly and let the little fella gain some experience. Thankfully we have an offense that will overcome the netminders weakness on this squad.
Hot Dogs are like a T-Bone Steak where I come from.
by Uncle Buttershoe on Oct 19, 2009 11:46 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Do the goaltending "experts" even watch hockey?
What is with people calling out the butterfly style as if it’s some sort of bad habit that Huet must break? News flash (yeah, I just said “news flash”): Every fucking goalie in the NHL today plays a butterfly style (with the possible exception of Brodeur, who plays some sort of old school hybrid, but still is on the ice quite often). There’s a reason too….it’s the best way to cover the most net! You are completely misinterpreting what Stephane Waite is working on with Huet. He’s not trying to get him out of the butterfly style. He’s not trying to get Huet to learn some completely new technique. He is merely trying to get him to stay up a little longer in certain situations, before deploying the………BUTTERFLY, not to stand up and make saves that he would normally make with his pads on the ice.
Damn you Pat Foley for finishing your thought the other night. I wish the Hawks would have just kept piling on goals so he wouldn’t have gotten the chance to finish talking about Stephane Waite.
by Geoffhawk on Oct 20, 2009 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
This one does, and also plays the position....
I agree that sports casters misconstru what they intrepret about the game, especially when most of them either never played the game, or played poorly in the NHL and became a talking head. My comments are based on watching Huet (not just in Chicago) play a one sided style that obviously is average at best. The talk of his weak catch glove side has been known since he was with the L.A. Kings. This guy just isnt improving. He shows signs of slight brilliance from time to time, but not enough to do his part in carrying this team as far as they are “predicted” to go.
Hot Dogs are like a T-Bone Steak where I come from.
by Uncle Buttershoe on Oct 20, 2009 8:31 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
But that's the thing...
Does he really need to “carry” the team?
NOW STOP IT RIGHT HERE
by mjthor on Oct 21, 2009 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I do like reading fifthfeather.
But I view these sites as complimentary of each other, like salt and pepper, guns and ammo, cheerios and milk, breasts.
Got more soul than a sock with a hole.
by chrome on Oct 20, 2009 10:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t understand: If the Hawks can have Fraser & Skille under the Cap, then why can’t they have Ebbett & Skille up here and Fraser down @ Rockford?
by WirtzGMnomore on Oct 20, 2009 11:06 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
As a 7th-overall pick or whatever it was, I think Skille’s cap hit ends up including some fairly significant bonus additions, and most of those bonuses are pretty easy to meet (games played, minutes, etc.) … it’s not like he has to score 40 goals or anything.
by ChicoMaki on Oct 20, 2009 12:07 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 















