Felix and Oscar: Why Toews Is The Worst Teammate Kane Could Have
Given that some of the silliness that the comments after posts on this blog can be was the inspiration for the column that ran in last night's Indian, I figured I should post it here. Hope you enjoy it after the jump.
As Sam has pointed out on a few occasions in the past in his editorials, this is sometimes a confounding sports town in the way many of the fans lionize mediocre players, and place a premium on working hard with limited talent. It’s the reason Kyle Orton was a borderline folk hero here, sometimes ridiculously compared to Johnny Unitas. It’s the reason that many of my fellow White Sox fans have convinced themselves that the 2005 World Series was won with "small ball", even though the numbers show the team slugged its way to the title.
And it’s also the reason that Jonathan Toews is the worst teammate Patrick Kane could ever have.
Now before you immediately start to wipe your ass with this page of the program, please hear me out on this one. Given the way that a vocal portion of Chicago sports fans demand that their athletic heroes be as "blue-collar" as they perceive themselves as being, as well as the respective personalities and skill sets of both Toews and Kane, there is no one in hockey that Patrick Kane could have that could paint him in a less favorable light to those fans than Jonathan Toews.
If you’ve purchased this program, chances are you’re quite familiar with the player profiles of the Blackhawks two young stars, so I won’t waste much space comparing and contrasting what it is they do on the ice. There is Toews cast as the humble, highly-skilled, do-everything centerman and emerging young captain with a borderline-maniacal fixation on winning, Kane as the flashy playmaker with an occasional propensity for off-ice antics.
Fans have given Kane a rough ride throughout a good portion of his two-and-a-quarter seasons with the Blackhawks for various reasons. He’s soft. He’s too small. He’s a whiner. He’s immature. He doesn’t backcheck. He showboats. He doesn’t try hard enough. Of all of those statements, the dig on immaturity might be the only one that has ever held any water, but keep in mind that he is still ONLY 20 years old, and into his third NHL season. This particular criticism is brought into even sharper contrast having Jonathan Toews as a teammate; one who is less than a year older than Kane and an absolute freak of maturity and competitive desire. Toews was the third youngest player in the history of the league to be named captain of his team, and arguably the greatest captain in league history, Steve Yzerman, has nothing but effusive praise for his fellow #19 in the leadership department. This is just not normal for a 21-year old NHLer.
On the ice, Toews continues to make Kane look like nothing more than a primadonna wide receiver to those who need their athletes to be working class with his competitive will and ability to answer the bell in any situation his coach asks him to perform in any phase of the game. Whereas Kane is simply asked to make the offense cook while being defensively responsible, he is then in turn villified for the appearance of so-called soft play. Even as Kane has progressively grown into one of the NHL’s premiere offensive talents by adding strength and size to his frame as well as a now lethal shot to compliment his puck handling wizardry and pinpoint passing, there are still those who believe that when the Cap Apocalypse arrives at the conclusion of this season, Kane will be the one who the Hawks can afford to let walk. Bluntly speaking, anyone who believes that is putting aesthetic over production far more than they project Kane and his alleged showboating to do on and off the ice. While he might not serve the same purpose on the ice as Toews, Kane is just as valuable a piece of the puzzle.
While it may not appear that Kane is "trying" as hard when on the ice to some fans out there, often times it’s because he’s so good, he’s making things look easy. The reality of the situation is that Kane has been told his entire career since being a bantam that he’s been too small. Call it a Napoleon Complex if you will, but in spite of what you perceive to be a will to win as compared to Jonathan Toews, that little shit has the heart of a lion, and will do anything to let you know just how much you’ll pay if you ever doubt his abilities.Witness the goal in game 5 against Detroit last year, where he scored a clutch goal on an individual effort that possibly only two other people in the world could have accomplished. Even now this season, he’s showing up you, the fan who demands he be more blue collar, by controlling the puck in the hard, dirty, nasty areas of the ice where so-called runts often fear to tread. Yet still the perception remains that he floats, because Jonathan Toews commands the boards like few in the game do.
Because I was too young to remember the general opinion of him during the height of his talent, it makes me wonder if Denis Savard, the last truly elite puck handler and playmaker the Hawks possessed, was subject to these criticisms. While the past is certainly now viewed through rose colored glasses regarding Savvy's career, punctuated by every pregame highlight montage, hertiage night, and road watch appearance, did Hawks fans at the time want him to get his own nose a little dirtier rather than letting Al Secord take care of that department? Additionally, do fans of other teams who have now, or had in the past a flashy offensive talent, demand that player appear to be something they're not? While I'm certainly not comparing the accomplishments of the two, I'm curious if fans of the Canucks in the mid-90s wanted Pavel Bure to look like he was trying harder, or this this an exclusively Chicago thing?
All that being said, there are bigger issues to worry about at present, namely the power play and injuries to key players. By virtue of the fact that this discussion is even being had, it means that the Blackhawks have two of the top young talents in the game, which is always a good thing. But, until that vocal sect of fans who demand the appearance of blue collar work ethic from elite white collar talent learn to appreciate what incredible hockey they’re witnessing from both Toews and Kane, Kane will continue to suffer through the unjust criticisms. However, if the past is any indication, it will only fuel him to greater successes.
1 recs |
34 comments
|
Comments
“Given that some of the silliness that the comments after posts on this blog can be was the inspiration for the column that ran in last night’s Indian, I figured I should post it here”
What?
First Four Picks in the 2004 NHL Entry Draft: 1.Ovechkin 2.Malkin 3.Cam Barker 4.Andrew Ladd
Great Article! I feel that kane’s celebrations makes games more enjoyable in my opinion. It seems like he is having a blast. And sports arejust kids games and he is having fun. People need to just fuckin enjoy the show!
by Commit2DaIndian on Nov 14, 2009 3:47 PM CST reply actions
Well Played
Great piece, sums up circumstances pretty well, although from out here in California, it seems that Kaner gets a bit more love from the national media than not. Having been in the peculiar land of Raider, Niner, Warrior & Shark fans for the past 6 years, I believe the blue collar mythos is definitely a Chicago vibe. As to the Savvy references, I am old enough to remember (was in H.S. back in those days) & I do not believe he got nearly the grief that Kane does, probably because their were some pretty tough customers on those teams that were ready & willing to mix it up with the hated Norris foes. B. Wilson, C. Fraser, Secord & Jerome DuPont (who I believe never actually won a fight) come to mind versus dootchbags like Willie Plett and Harold Snepts. Looking forward to seeing tomorrow’s game on my television as opposed to my laptop!
great write up
it is amazing how few people accept the fact that not every player plays the game the same way and that the strength of a team is often having a diversity in playing styles. Individual stats be damned, if the team is winning chances are most players on the team are fulfilling their role.
really great article but.....
what silly comments?
There have been numerous comment threads dedicated to the assertion that Patrick Kane is lazy.
www.secondcityhockey.com
It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.
Noooooooooooooooooo,..................
Really,,,,who would touch the newly annioted “great one”?? Do not compare Savy to Kane….not yet…..Kane looked good last night on BOTH ends on the ice.——- But please Savard would undress the former “great one” every Edmonton would show up. Does Kaner elevate his play when the Cindy or the Injured One from Washington show up? Is he a point game player yet-like Larmer, Savard, or even Roenick? We will see…..Now SLoop you have a great point in fulfilling roles.—I agree
"Let 'em say all those nice things," he says, "but I know my mistakes, and I make plenty of them.-Bobby Orr
so if you agree that different players have different roles
and clearly patrick kane’s role is to produce goals and he is currently the team goal, assist and point leader and last year in the playoffs he was the goal leader and second in points only to JHC with a hat trick, isn’t that enough evidence that whatever comments you may have about him not consistently playing hard enough are, well, bullshit?
I have no idea
What point you were trying to make, I read your post at least 5 times, and still don’t know what you’re saying.
wait what?
Right On
I couldn’t agree with you more Troy. First of all you are spot on as far as some of the comments posted on this site. There are some real intelligent ones from time to time but there are some real dumb ones alot of the time as well. We all know Kane and Toews are totally different players. Both immensely talented in their own ways. But if the fans aren’t willing to put up with Kane’s “laziness” from time to time in exchange for what he brings to the table, they don’t know their ass from a hole in the ground. I understand that we have to put up with the country club fans at the UC, but I sure as hell hope they don’t take over this blog. He turns 21 this week and he’s getting better each year. Slowly but surely he will figure it out. Deal with it guys.
by Grampa on Nov 14, 2009 7:17 PM CST via mobile reply actions
the hoosers on canada hockey night
said that they expect long term deals to be announced for toews and kane in the next week or two.
by the way, the leafs pp is awesome, their 5v5, not so much.
Excellent and Intelligent Post!
For those who suggest Kane doesn’t have a strong work ethic, the term “silliness” is being kind.
It’s been a while, but I do remember Savvy getting a bit of grief during his second stint here because he had the habit of entering the zone and peeling back to the half wall. The claim made by some sportswriter types was that he was too chicken to charge the net. Of course, this is when the “clutch and grab” style was becoming the norm around the league so he was seen as soft since he wouldn’t fight through it. Kane does the exact same move now and they call it “patient” and “waiting for the trailer.” Given that he virtually always finds the trailer with a perfect tape-to-tape pass, I’d call it “smart” hockey.
And did you see him actually try to check someone the other night? (He sort of bounced off him and went down, but at least he tried!)
going back to Kane's goal on Friday night
did anyone else see that play and think of JHC? The lifting of the stick, strip of puck, and more specifically firing a top shelf wrister across his body high glove side. The way he put his body into that shot was very reminiscent of JHC’s Game 4 playoff goal against Vancouver. Kane’s ability to fight through checks this year, carry the puck into the zone, and just wait until he finds an opening…….I know this is what great playmakers do, I just see a little Marty in Kaner this year, and it is awesome to see.
I’m pretty sure most of us think Kane will have the better career of the two, and Kane does have better hands……….watching Kaner’s development is one of the most fun parts of supporting the indianhead.
"If you're scared, go buy a dog" - Stacey King
See What I Mean
Stupid comment. Kane’s goal and Havlat’s goal in Game 4 and not even close to being similar. Stupid comment.
by Grampa on Nov 15, 2009 12:51 AM CST via mobile reply actions
I don't think it's that stupid..
Havlat stripped a defenseman from behind.. moved towards the center of the zone and spun firing a shot as he fell. It’s not exactly the same but I could see how it’s reminiscent of the goal.
Why do you disagree?
by Matthew Dirt on Nov 15, 2009 10:04 AM CST up reply actions
see what you mean about what?
To say “see what I mean” means that you are referencing some previous point you made earlier. Are you saying that my point is dumb as are many of the dumb comments (which are negative) about Kane, or are you implying that I am one of the so-called “country club fans”? Either way, some explanation would be nice.
And by stupid do you mean stupid like doesn’t know shit about hockey, or stupid like too fucking stupid to reply to a post you are commenting on?
"If you're scared, go buy a dog" - Stacey King
by hackerar on Nov 15, 2009 5:19 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
This year or bust
I have no idea how the Hawks win the cup after this year. I feel like a yard sale is coming no matter what happens. I just hope it happens this year. We’re in 1st place (barely) but our success depends on 2 players, Hossa and Huet. I would love to keep Toews, Kane and Keith. But the cap is going to KILL us next year. So this year is our best chance until Huet is gone.
Never expected or wanted Kane to put his body on someone else
but just like he lifted the oppenents stick in the offensive zone he can do the same in the defensive zone. He has been much more active the last couple of games in both ends—-and that has paid off for himself and the team. His skills are those of the elite…..but is he hungry enough to join them?…maybe
NOW Gee, who would we want to play that physical game……..
c’mon lil bufferoo -—

"Let 'em say all those nice things," he says, "but I know my mistakes, and I make plenty of them.-Bobby Orr
Thank you............
“The price of success is hard work, dedication to the job at hand, and the determination that whether we win or lose, we have applied the best of ourselves to the task at hand.”
Vince Lombardi
"Let 'em say all those nice things," he says, "but I know my mistakes, and I make plenty of them.-Bobby Orr
Wow i dont think you could be any more wrong about these two guys. You contradict yourself constantly in this article. I dont know what hockey you have been watching but its certainly not the NHL. I will be wiping my ass with your crappy article. Sorry man you are just wrong in everyway, especially about Kane.
Care to explain how or why McClure is wrong?
If not and you really want to print out the article only to wipe your ass with it.. feel free.
by Matthew Dirt on Nov 16, 2009 7:22 AM CST up reply actions
Great stuff McClure
Since you brought up Savvy and Secord, I had to ask my Dad to compare (as he covered some of those 80s Hawk teams for the Trib) to Kaner and Toews. He mentioned back then, “the Hawks (and fans) were grateful to have a guy in Savard with those kind of playmaking and scoring abilities, because they were surely lacking it. No one asked Savard to work and/or check harder, because his roll was to create offense, not necessarily knocking guys over and stealing the puck…but after his other teammates did perform that kind of work to get him the puck, they knew he could finish the job. No one ever called Savard out.”
The current Hawks know that too. Do you think some of those early 80s Hawk teams thought “Jeez this Savard guy doesn’t work hard enough along the boards”. I imagine it probably went, “shit yeah this guy is setting up and scoring goals when we get him the puck! Thank you Jesus!” You can have as many bruisers as possible winning board battles…but the final score doesn’t tally board victories, it’s fucking goals. And Kaner, much like Savvy, knows how to do that. He makes those bruisers even better, as they know their tenacity will be rewarded…on the fucking scoreboard.
This whole “blue-collar” romanticism of former players is grossly unfair to the current men on the team. It’s a differently league, team, and mentality. It’s sickens me that NOW the Hawks are back towards the top of the league, there are some fans complaining HOW it’s being done, and nitpicking at certain players like Kane. It’s a shame that he still has to prove himself, even to his own teams’ fans. What else do you need him to do people!? If your answer is “work harder”, you need to watch harder.
We’re winning jagbags. And the current Kaner is one of the big reasons for that. Shut. Up.
"What the hell, let's review it." - Dale Tallon
"They are!" - Pat Foley
"What a farce." - Dale Tallon
by HawkVision on Nov 16, 2009 1:44 PM CST reply actions 1 recs

by 























