Second City Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Interview With UMD Athletic Director, Dr. Debbie Yow

Bomb.Repeat.Bomb. - Blackhawks 7 - Flames 1

Its become something of a tradition around these parts - but every time the Blackhawks absolutely dismantle the Flames we get an appearance of a vastly under-appreciated Simpsons character

Images_medium

That my friends, was a paddlin' indeed.

During the first period it seemed like the Hawks were having a bit of trouble getting things going.  They grabbed the lead when Troy Brouwer was left alone in front of the net on the Hawks first power play but it didn't seem like somthing you'd want to rest on.  It was obvious the winning team would need more than just one goal that resulted after an even first.  The shots on goal were tied and if not for a few great saves by Huet, it could have been tied.  Then the Flames started the second on a power play and wasted only 14 seconds before Olli Jokinen snuck the puck past Cristobal Huet.  With the game tied we started to settle in for nail-biting close game.

And then Hammer absolutely ruined Rene Bourque

We'll set aside the fact that Niklas Hjalmarsson may have left his feet to make the hit (haven't seen a good enough replay of it yet) because this was the breaking point in this game.  Nigel Dawes came to defend Bourque (who didn't really skate again after the hit) and was given 2 minutes for roughing.  Shockingly, the Blackhawks scored on that power play too and didn't look back.  Even Dustin Byfuglien decided it was just about time for him to do something again to keep himself from getting benched and had a nice takeaway and goal.  Don't expect to see him again for at least 6 more weeks.  After Hammer's hit the Flames wilted and died - We didn't see anything close to the game we were expecting.

How good were the Hawks in the second period?  They finally fucking scored on a 5 on 3... that's how good.  They were something like 0 for 5 with the two extra men but had continually been shut down until tonight.  The Hawks exploded for the most goals of any period this year, got their first player with a multi-goal game (VERSTEEG!), were 80% on the power play, and finished with 13 players getting at least a single point... There's just about nothing poor to say about the men of four feathers in this game.  Everything went as well as you could hope. 

Well - I guess Seabrook could have made Dion Phaneuf bleed.  That would have completed the night.  In case you needed any more evidence that this frankenstein is one of the biggest shitbirds in the league, look no further than picking a fight with someone while wearing a visor.  Even the zebras called bullshit on that move and gave him a phantom 2 minutes for roughing.  So VERSTEEG! followed it up by scoring his second of the night.

Oh, and as is being pointed out - Hossa is almost ready to make the Blackhawks even more dangerous.

Other Thoughts:

  • The Flames ought to be ashamed for leaving Brouwer alone on the crease for so long.  It's one thing to ignore a player while the puck is being cycled around the zone but I think Troy got three shots off before netting the final one without so much as being breathed on by a Flames player.
  • Seabrook was a force all over the ice tonight.
  • Has Colin Fraser ever won a fight?  Dude, you're a center and I think we've seen the end of the Ebbett experiment - I think your spot is safe at least until Dave Bolland comes back. 
  • This was the first game of the year where the Hawks were outshot but still won.  They also lost the face off battle (EDIT:  Just kidding - they actually won 53% of the faceoffs, I misread)

Player Of The Game:

Fuck.. how do you choose?  Duncan Keith had three assists and was the usual monster in the Hawks end.  Patrick Kane had a goal and an assist on his 21st birthday (first carbomb is on me, kid).  Kris Versteeg had 2 goals on the power play.  Patrick Sharp added two points.  Hammer changed the tempo of the game with a huge hit on a player I'm quickly growing to hate (and added an assist). And of course Cristobal Huet had a brilliant game making big stops to keep the Hawks in it when it was close and stayed focused when it got out of control - this was also his best SV% (.964) in a non-shutout game.

So we're going to let you pick.  Time for the first poll in a while.

Poll
Who should the Player of The Game be?
Cristobal Huet - .964SV %
214 votes
Patrick Kane - 1G, 1A
60 votes
Kris Versteeg - 2G
97 votes
Duncan Keith - 3A
136 votes
Niklas Hjalmarsson - 1A, 2 Hits (both on Bourque)
196 votes
Someone else
5 votes

708 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 122 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I voted Kane

Keith probably deserved it, but it’s Kane’s birthday. And because that hookup with VERSTEEG! was the Perfect Goal. Just beautiful.

My first post here, by the way. Been lurking since late in the regular season last year, and I’ve gotten to the point where this is a daily (at least) read for me. Hats off to the writers and commenters here, it’s a wonderful site and I’m glad to be a part.

by Brian C on Nov 20, 2009 12:29 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

welcome

always glad to see people de-lurk. Thanks for the compliments

by Matthew Dirt on Nov 20, 2009 1:15 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Me too

Voted for Kane just cause it was his b-day, so I’ll excuse his lazy ass and goal post hitting for that. Actually, I think Brouwer should have been in the poll, and really, I can’t decide who was player of the game, there were so many good things going on.

And welcome Brian C.

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on Nov 20, 2009 8:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Me too...

Longtime lurker, and when I realized I was here ever.day. I figured it was time to get involved. Happy Birthday Kaner.

by GirlHawk on Nov 20, 2009 1:23 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

wat

that’s one of the best tracks on that album.

NOW STOP IT RIGHT HERE

by mjthor on Nov 20, 2009 6:34 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I voted Hammer

Without that hit, that’s a totally different game, and a much closer game at that. So props to him for destroying Bourque, and adding an assist, and playing his usual calm, controlled game. This kid is just impressing me more and more every time I watch him play.

GO BLACKHAWKS
Witness to Mark Buehrle's perfect game July 23, 2009

by chisoxfan1473 on Nov 20, 2009 1:30 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Yep.

Definitely Hammer.
Bourque = Ciccarelli (in the assclown category).

by chefofthefuture on Nov 20, 2009 7:41 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Voted Hammer.....

mostly cause I want to see his woman again… see what happens when you let the masses vote?

by Wanker751 on Nov 20, 2009 10:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Hammer

Was anything better than the camera catching him on the bench grinning ear to ear after than hit? He’s great.

by hoorock89 on Nov 20, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

that was priceless. He had the same grin when he stayed on the bench at the end while Buff took his D shift.

by runningquicklynowhere on Nov 20, 2009 11:53 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Explain that comparsion to me.....

"Let 'em say all those nice things," he says, "but I know my mistakes, and I make plenty of them.-Bobby Orr

by taBruiser on Nov 20, 2009 3:25 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I closed my eyes and clicked ... does that still count as a vote?

It was Versteeg, by the way. Although Huet came up with some monster saves as well. I would give Hjalmarsson a sentimental vote though, because Borque is going to feel that one for a few days. And not in a good way.

by gmh on Nov 20, 2009 1:31 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Of course that counts...

Isn’t that how the baseball writers vote for the hall of fame?

by tazer19 on Nov 20, 2009 8:40 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and BCS rankings.

wait what?

by pepe126 on Nov 20, 2009 12:19 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Gotta be VERSTEEG!

Guy works his ass off the last five games, and no twine to show for it.

Last night, he bags two by standing in the right (almost identical) spot.

Hockey’s a funny game kids.

by cliffkoroll on Nov 20, 2009 10:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Just watched the game highlights

and noticed both of Versteeg!’s goals came as a result of a no-look pass (by Kaner and Keith, respectively) and BOTH while on the PP. Definitely the way these guys had to start this trip.

Also, to quote the call on Eager’s goal, courtesy of the TSN feed, “There’s another”. Hilarious.

by ITypedforMiles on Nov 20, 2009 1:41 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I voted for Miikka Kiprusoff ........

Is Bickell driving back and forth to Rockford on this road trip? Best game in awhile for the Bufferoo—sooo much potential-he needs a lesson in nastiness from the Hammer. Huet was exceptionally good-but doesn’t it scare you after a save he is lookin behind himself for the puck?
and finally Sopel ,he is such an oddity on team that goes 100 mph he seems to have found snergy by going only 30 mph-maybe 15mph—he is effectively slow

"Let 'em say all those nice things," he says, "but I know my mistakes, and I make plenty of them.-Bobby Orr

by taBruiser on Nov 20, 2009 1:41 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Unlike Matty Walker...

Who traveled at snail speeds and was ineffectively slow until asked to throw haymakers.

by My2ndProject on Nov 20, 2009 8:21 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sopel

is just pacing himself…

by PitMartini on Nov 20, 2009 10:52 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Huey

had an amazing night, when the only goal you let in is off of a power play, in my opinion that is almost as good as a shutout, since usually the goals most forgiven are those that score on a powerplay or a bad turnover that just gives the other team a gift. Hammer’s destruction of some guy not fit to wear the greatest logo in sports was awesome, but Huet kept the came from being close with the clutch saves he needs to make.

wait what?

by pepe126 on Nov 20, 2009 1:52 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Did anybody

Catch Borque’s soul actually leaving his body after Hjalmersson’s hit? I’m pretty sure that shit would have shown up on “Paranormal Activity”.

by AirTrafficAJ on Nov 20, 2009 3:53 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I thought Buff

had a nice game,good poke check,and nice goal…..the poke check he made was nothing but effort…..effort to move his feet and try and pry the puck away,i still dont get why he doesn’t make play like that regularly,even if he doesn’t score a goal

GO HAWKS!!!

by csm on Nov 20, 2009 4:09 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I agree

He only seems to show up big and put extra effort in for big games a la last year’s playoffs and rivalry match-ups. He needs to get meaner more.

by My2ndProject on Nov 20, 2009 8:23 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

Sure looked after his goal like he was talking some shit to the Flames too. He needs to do that alot more instead of his typically no emotion/can’t be bothered to give a shit look.

by runningquicklynowhere on Nov 20, 2009 11:56 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Is that the shit ....

look he had on his face while Dion Phaneuf was skating toward Seabrook….Buff did a 180 degree turn around and headed out of there. … Me likey Bickell better

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Nov 20, 2009 12:45 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

the hawks won 53-47 on FOs, btw

or at least, that’s what this is telling me.

I picked Hammer because that hit opened the floodgates.

(Maybe Fraz was trying to impress Uncle Brent Sutter.)

by chiblackhawks on Nov 20, 2009 6:25 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I just took

a look at the link you posted,and you are right,the Hawks did win the FO battle…..Toews was a beast on the FO’s,and Madden was abouve 50% again,nicely done Hawks!!

by csm on Nov 20, 2009 6:49 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

weird.. the box score just after the game said they lost the faceoffs. I guess it was changed

by Matthew Dirt on Nov 20, 2009 7:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Without the man from France

this game would have been seriously uphill. I love that he is helping making the Flames the ‘Hawks’ prison bitches.

Occam's Razor keeps the cutting clean.

by russellguldin on Nov 20, 2009 6:35 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Overall

i thought the Hawks played really good,the defense allowwed quite a bit of shots on goal,but it is Calgary,i mean they do have a nice offense,and you can’t expect the D to hold every team to 20 shots a game….Kaner was great,Steeger had a wicked game,and even though he didn’t record an assist or goal,Toews was huge tonight…Awesome on FO’s and on penalty kills,his effort on that one penalty kill was a thing of beauty,practically by himself he had the Flames keeping the puck in their own zone for a good 30 secs,it was a thing of beauty

by csm on Nov 20, 2009 6:52 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Give it to Huet

That diving save on Bouwmeester changed the whole game since it kept it from getting tied. If not give it to Ham Sandwich for putting Ms. Rene on her ass.

by alpo on Nov 20, 2009 8:10 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Gotta love NHL on the Fly

First, the comment “Im sure the entire Sutter family was embarassed and wanted to suit up for that game”

Then, a Homie the Clown reference.

by clhoffy on Nov 20, 2009 8:10 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Great Summary

This site is a daily read for me also and the source of at least 3 genuine lol’s. Man this team is sick although it STILL hasn’t hit me we have MARIAN HOSSA about to rejoin. Wow.

by Northside_Dan on Nov 20, 2009 8:10 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Huet is a streaky goalie

Did it last year too after the 9 game winning streak in December. Enjoy it while it lasts because he will turn back into The French Asshole soon.

by clhoffy on Nov 20, 2009 8:12 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I am enjoying it.

I be on my green like Irish Spring.

by chrome on Nov 20, 2009 8:14 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

no complaints here.

John Madden is a stud!

http://twitter.com/hawksfansince08

by hawksfansince08 on Nov 20, 2009 8:17 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Lemme guess, you’re the guy at weddings quoting divorce statistics. And puking in the bathroom sink.

by ChicoMaki on Nov 20, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Hilarious!

Great comment Chico.

Where’s the link to the “Get Rid of Huet Now” website, clhoffy? Geez! Can’t we enjoy a win streak around here?

by Preacher000 on Nov 20, 2009 10:22 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Simply search on Facebook

For the group The Conglomeration Against French Goalies

by clhoffy on Nov 20, 2009 10:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

To at least one of those.

by clhoffy on Nov 20, 2009 10:29 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Allow seven goals?

That’s a paddlin’. Pick a fight while wearing a visor? That’s a paddlin’.

Dammit that game was fun to watch last night! I was ready for yet another one-goal game, especially after the first, but I rather enjoy the laughers. I hope they keep up the steam through this road trip. It’d be fantastic to see them beamin’ with confidence when they get back from the trip and open up a ridiculous lead in the central thereafter.

"What the hell, let's review it." - Dale Tallon
"They are!" - Pat Foley
"What a farce." - Dale Tallon

by HawkVision on Nov 20, 2009 8:23 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

The nice thing about laughers

is low ice time for your important players. Keith had his 4th lowest TOI last night.

by Spotacus on Nov 20, 2009 8:36 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Did you guys hear they signed Hossa too?

I be on my green like Irish Spring.

by chrome on Nov 20, 2009 8:30 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

OMG

Do you know when he’s gonna be back???

How are we gonna sign Toews Kane and Kieth???

Why don’t we trade Campbell???

by AirTrafficAJ on Nov 20, 2009 12:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Kane goal X2

I finally got off my lazy ass and got an account going because i seem to be the only one that saw Kane get two goals. I swear that right before Ladd got his breakaway goal, Kane put one in the upper deck and made the water bottle dance, but the ref’s whistled it as a no-goal because they thought it hit the post. I rewound that bitch about 3 times and each time i saw that puck go in and bounce right back out. To me, anytime you see the water bottle dance you know it was a goal – Am i going crazy or did anyone else see that too?

by BennyDelight on Nov 20, 2009 9:03 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

You're right

I was yelling at the TV that the bottle jumped. It had to of hit the post inside/underneath and hit net to that caused the bottle to jump. I’ve never seen a bottle jump that wasn’t a result of the puck hitting the top netting.

  That being said i think they didn’t argue ti due to Laddy’s goal like 15 secnonds later. My other thought was that if it did indeed go in at least on of the players would have reacted when the bottle jumped. I didn’t record the game so i can’t replay the shot and see for myself.

September 26, 2007 The day a Franchise was reborn.

by Roos-34 on Nov 20, 2009 9:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That's what I thought I saw as well

But there is a chance you’re crazy, regardless of this actually happening.

And welcome.

www.secondcityhockey.com

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

by McClure on Nov 20, 2009 9:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

blackhawks were lucky to have 2 no goals ruled in their favor

against San Jose and Toronto.

I’m not complaining if that first Kane “goal” last night is the price we pay for the first two fortunate calls.

by chiblackhawks on Nov 20, 2009 9:59 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

You're not the only one who saw it

Didn’t one of the announcers on the TSN broadcast say the same thing about the water bottle jumping? “I want to have a closer look at that,” or something along those lines. Then the Hawks scored and the other commentator said, “Well it doesn’t matter now.” And we never got to see a replay.

And on Hammers hit, it was completely shoulder to shoulder. But I thought he left his feet so I was expecting a penalty.

by Preacher000 on Nov 20, 2009 10:11 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I saw replay

With my DVR. I saw stick came up and hit the bottle from inside the net…. that’s what made the bottle pop up…

by Wanker751 on Nov 20, 2009 12:43 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

After watching the replay a few times

It looks to me like Kippers stick hits the water bottle. Watch it again…the bottle jumps after the puck is already out of the net and he throws up his stick to make a “save.”

VERSTEEG!

by Bwana on Nov 20, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes.

I mentioned it in the game thread too Benny. But my only viewing format is this computer so I couldn’t do any of that fancy back-up review, zoom in, CSI puck-cam stuff. Kinda looked that way though. So… 8-1?

"Call Detroit, tell dem... BULLSHIT!"

by Hungryhawk on Nov 20, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Alabama woodshed ass whippin

The hit to me looked clean..looked more shoulder to shoulder not a head shot..so I don’t think will warrant time off. The league should make a rule that if you wear a visor and your in a fight you have to take your helmet OFF!!! that is like football players fighting with helmets on what is the point. It happened last night and the fight the other night that Fraser got into the guy had a shield on as well

by Bargeman68 on Nov 20, 2009 9:04 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I could have not asked for a better game against the team I hate the most next to Vancouver...

WOW!!!!!! I think Hammer is talking to Mike Tyson because that was a TKO in the 1 round! This flames team is made up of a bunch of losers. Because every time they know they are no match they try to pick fights or get someone hurt, kind of reminds me of the NUCKS. I love the fact that we ran up the score on them like that to show them that hey, you came in our house and were losing 5 to 0 and we still came back and won. For my vote I pick the whole team as players of the game.

by redtribe14 on Nov 20, 2009 9:31 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Another thing I caught

Did anyone else hear Torchetti refer to Hjalmarsson as “The Hammer”? during the pre-3rd interview? It doesn’t surprise me though, Nik’s resemblance to Fred Williamson is striking.

www.secondcityhockey.com

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

by McClure on Nov 20, 2009 9:34 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I heard that, too. Still waiting for someone to refer to him as Super Nintendo at some point during the season.

by Brian C on Nov 20, 2009 9:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Redtribe14- Second City Hockey’s Self-Proclaimed Arbiter of Heterosexuality.

www.secondcityhockey.com

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

by McClure on Nov 20, 2009 10:09 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope there's a pamphlet or newsletter I can subscribe to

"What the hell, let's review it." - Dale Tallon
"They are!" - Pat Foley
"What a farce." - Dale Tallon

by HawkVision on Nov 20, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Closet Gay Men

seem to be the worst homophobes. Just sayin’.

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on Nov 20, 2009 11:58 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

OMG

redtribe14 = Alan Keyes

by Scott13 on Nov 20, 2009 12:39 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Could also be Glenn Beck

by hawksfan21 on Nov 20, 2009 12:48 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Beck’s not in the closet.

by Scott13 on Nov 20, 2009 1:14 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Lay off ole Redtribe

He learned to use the reply button!!!!

Our little special kid is growing up!

Chicagoan in the Lou.

by Mike Martin on Nov 20, 2009 2:31 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Really? Simpsons references are fruity? I’ll grant you that Seinfeld references would be toeing the line, but I thought the Simpsons were safe.

by Brian C on Nov 20, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Been 1 of his

nicknames here far before you’ve been around,.

Fall in line or get out

September 26, 2007 The day a Franchise was reborn.

by Roos-34 on Nov 20, 2009 11:19 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

a sweet shift from VERSTEEG!

from the game highlights:

Watch between 00:59 to 1:13.

Seabrook on a PP opp takes a shot, hits the post, and the Blackhawks regroup. Barker passes the puck back to Seabs, who takes another shot, and VERSTEEG! tips it in for the 2nd PPG of the night.

Watch again, though, because VERSTEEG! wasn’t even by the net in the first shot— in fact, he gets a stick on the rebound off the first shot, passes it over to Kane, who passes it to Barker who sends it to Seabs— and by the time Seabs takes his shot, VERSTEEG! has managed to skate behind the net into position for the tip in.

As he would say, “What a beauty.”

by chiblackhawks on Nov 20, 2009 10:21 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

The best part of that sequence is Seabrook moving all the broken sticks out of the play.

by Scott13 on Nov 20, 2009 10:47 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

That sixth goal

looked like a video game – pass, pass, one-timer goal. I chuckled with child-like joy after that one, in admiration of how simple they made it look.

And I loved the shots TSN had of Sutter, he looked liked he was having a stroke…especially after the 7th and final tally. Either that, or he was soiling himself…maybe both.

"What the hell, let's review it." - Dale Tallon
"They are!" - Pat Foley
"What a farce." - Dale Tallon

by HawkVision on Nov 20, 2009 11:23 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

How do i choose just one?

I went with Keith because he was just all over the ice, though none of the guys are undeserving. As cool as it was to see ‘em run Calgary out of their own building, I kind of wish this game could have been at the UC so the Flames had to listen to Chelsea Dagger seven times. As if the Hawks aren’t in their heads enough…
Oh yeah, and long-time reader, first post. Great site, and thanks to everyone who cracks me up while I’m at work and makes me look like an idiot.

...Feeding Rene Bourque his own dick since 11/19/09

by Hjammer of the Gods on Nov 20, 2009 10:22 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Excellent moniker

Welcome.

www.secondcityhockey.com

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

by McClure on Nov 20, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

It's nice to see new people join

who aren’t dumbasses.

I be on my green like Irish Spring.

by chrome on Nov 20, 2009 10:40 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Ahhh c'mon

you like us “dumbasses”….it breaks up the suckhole fest

"Let 'em say all those nice things," he says, "but I know my mistakes, and I make plenty of them.-Bobby Orr

by taBruiser on Nov 20, 2009 1:27 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

i can only aspire to semi-dumbass

I didn’t notice chrome here before I joined with my usual online nickname. c’est la vie…

by krome on Nov 20, 2009 10:27 PM CST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I love it when a plan comes togther

I guess Calgary saw the Hawks A-team lasr night. I pity the fools.

Nice summary, Matt.

Calgary came out hard and hitting and I thought Kipper was pretty sharp early (the Hawks didn’t roll over a flat or lousy team last night), but Toews, along with Kane, Sharp, and Buff, we’re really flying from the git-go.

Kane appears on the cusp of superstardom (except for his laziness). He’ll come back to earth at some point (maybe), but what a treat. Even when he sticks his nose in, it’s hard to get a good shot on a sturdy fire hydrant.

Toews was a relentless monster, dominating behind both nets. He brought it every shift. I was a bit worried he was almost reckless, like in his rookie season. Didn’t take any big hits, but a wee bit of caution might be best long-term.

Dunc- well, dog bites man. No story here. He enjoyed a rest (only 23:52), which accounts for him looking especially spry and refreshed late.

Question for the aficionados: for most of the year, the Hawks have played keep away, dominating time of posession and shot differential.

Last night, it seemed they played differently. More aggressive, more about pushing the puck up ice, clearing the zone rather than the sometimes too-cute own zone passing- in short, more of a field position game.

I can see uses for both styles at times, and it’s scary to see how easily the Hawks can switch styles.

Am I imagingng this? I don’t know the time of posession stats, but the shots on goal bear it out. The Hawks were outshot , but Calgary had generally lower quality shots, and the Hawks dominated every aspect of the game.

by cliffkoroll on Nov 20, 2009 10:45 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I’m guessing the plan for the road trip against the good teams is to keep it simple and get the puck as far away from the defensive end as quickly as possible, even if it means giving up posession, and then go with the loose puck battles. I think they needed to get the road trip off on the right foot and they couldn’t afford to go down big to Calgary again, and it paid off. It will be interesting to see what their approach to the Edmonton game is, a team that doesn’t offer as much talent.

by Scott13 on Nov 20, 2009 10:51 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

To me it looked like they realized that they had Calgary on an off-night fairly early – probably around the time that three Flames stood around watching Brouwer take repeated hacks at his own rebounds – and decided to really take it to them.

Let’s face it, that Brouwer goal was something of an embarrassment for Calgary. Three guys were there and simply didn’t move to help out their goalie. It was like in Serpico, when Pacino goes first through the door and gets shot in the face.

I thought that set the tone even more than the Hammer hit. It took the rest of the first to break Calgary, but it wasn’t that hard, and when it was done they were destroyed. The Hammer hit was the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end.

by Brian C on Nov 20, 2009 11:02 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure I agree with you a hunnert percent on your policework, there, Lou

Fer shure the Brouwer goal was an embarrassment, as you colorfully relate.

But, the Flames tied it early in the second, and the real key was Huet’s sprawling save in a 2-1 game. Up to that point, I thought it was a fairly-even, well-played game by both teams.

I know Nintendo’s hit was in there somewhere, but the Huet save seemed more crucial.

After Buff made the best full ice play since, well, Knucklehead Barker a week ago, it was good night Irene.

by cliffkoroll on Nov 20, 2009 11:30 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, it had been fairly even, but I never had the feeling that Calgary would be able to keep that up. Let’s face it, that we’re even talking about which single event broke the Flames is evidence enough that deep down, we all felt the same way. Huet’s save was awesome, and Hammer’s hit was great, but hard hits and great saves happen all the time. Neither event was significant enough to turn a close game into 7-1 if a beating wasn’t going to happen otherwise.

by Brian C on Nov 20, 2009 11:45 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

according to the folks over at matchsticks and gasoline

Flames dominated the ES portion of the game, which is pretty much affirmed by the Corsi ratings from last night.

Then again, if there’s a combined 20 PIM in a single game— that’s a whole period of special teams, give or take a few seconds of overlap— I guess ES stats don’t really amount to much.

The Hawks were outshot because by the third period, they didn’t have to pressure for more goals. 1 in 4 of their 24 shots have already gone in.

by chiblackhawks on Nov 20, 2009 11:05 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Here's another ES stat

Hawks 3, Flames 0. Maybe this isn’t as important as Corsi though.

Dominated? No harm in those hosers trying to convince themselves of that, I suppose.

by cliffkoroll on Nov 20, 2009 12:18 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Really?

Wow,that sux,i mean in the end the final score matters….and when you score that many power play goals in a game you are bound to win,but I dont like the fact that the Hawks were outplayed during even strength….but whatever,i’ll take a 7-1 victory,this victory compares to the 9-2 victory last year against edmonton

by csm on Nov 20, 2009 12:49 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

No Not a "Ba" a BOMB

If you’re old enough to remember the Jordan era, what we’ve been doing to Calgary feels a lot like what happened to Cleveland here and here. Just look at how many times we’ve lit the lamp on their all world goalie.

And you could have picked almost anyone for player of the game, it was that dominant and that much of a team effort. But I picked Huet partly because he had another good game, but mostly because I knew it would piss certain people off. So … you’re welcome.

by Scott13 on Nov 20, 2009 10:58 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Can we get Huet ....

a lighter glove?

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Nov 20, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I can't find the Hammer hit anywhere...

….does anyone have a link? I had to work so could only listen. I need to see this!

by rsievert on Nov 20, 2009 11:24 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

Haven’t seen it anywhere either. Will post if I do.

www.secondcityhockey.com

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

by McClure on Nov 20, 2009 11:28 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Huet

I’ll generally root for the underdog who gets fed shit-sandwiches for showing they’re merely human. I refuse to revisit the start of his season, which now seems like a distant rotten dream, but that was fairly well a clinic last night. I was happy like a muppet to see the survey results. Obviously a fantastic all around effort, but gonna go with Huet.

In my own sad little hockey world brain, I’d like to give an honorable mention to Captain Tazer too, who was once again forcing the enemy to stare into the eye of his shit hurricane while remaining off the scoresheet altogether. Fuck I love this team. 13 players with points? Something has awoken the fire-breathing (or in this case, fire-eating) beast we have become.

"Call Detroit, tell dem... BULLSHIT!"

by Hungryhawk on Nov 20, 2009 11:32 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

You’d like to think that calls for his execution have been all but squashed by his recent performances, but you never know.

To quote Chris Cuthbert last night “this team has chance to really be something special this season”. It certainly does.

It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!

by hawks61 on Nov 20, 2009 7:05 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Another weird thing last night

The Bottom Lounge for a road watch? Don’t get me wrong, I like the place a lot, but it just doesn’t strike me as one of the usual Chad-infested bro bars they usually pick for these events. Maybe it’s because it’s an afternoon game on a weekday (albeit Black Friday) that they figure there will be enough professional alcoholics there anyway independent of it being a Hawks event that it will make it seem as though it was well-attended.

www.secondcityhockey.com

It's a bird, it's a plane, it's a goddamn shame.

by McClure on Nov 20, 2009 11:43 AM CST reply actions   0 recs

I tried

To go to the Buffalo Wild Wings for the Bud Light road watch (and to see the Ice Crew Ladies of the Night). Got there at 7:30, and there was already a two hour wait list. I love that the Hawks are relevant again, but that’s kind of annoying. The price of fame I suppose…

by AirTrafficAJ on Nov 20, 2009 12:26 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

On a Boneless Thursday with an NFL Network game on, your wait probably would have been substantial with or without the Road Watch.

by hawksfan21 on Nov 20, 2009 12:29 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Nobody goes to those anymore...

…because they’re always so crowded.

by cliffkoroll on Nov 20, 2009 1:02 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

More trivia

Unless my memory is bad (often) it was 1-1 early in the second when the Hawks went off for 6 unanswered. The last two games against the Flames the Hawks have gone off for 6 unanswered.

by Scott13 on Nov 20, 2009 1:16 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Interesting nickname for Hammer over at Matchsticks and Gasoline… “Hjardtospell”

I like it.

by hawksfan21 on Nov 20, 2009 1:43 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Hawks PP douses flames!

Thanks for thoroughly swatting Calgary! We appreciate it!

Love, Avs

by Ace O'Dale on Nov 20, 2009 1:53 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

The fall out from the Hammer hit.

—Bourque is out against the Kings on Saturday

http://flames.nhl.com/club/preview.htm?id=2009020313&navid=DL|CGY|home

Way to go, Niklas! :D

GO BLACKHAWKS
Witness to Mark Buehrle's perfect game July 23, 2009

by chisoxfan1473 on Nov 20, 2009 3:15 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Wrong player

still rec’d.

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on Nov 20, 2009 7:56 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

and who becomes oddman out???

"Let 'em say all those nice things," he says, "but I know my mistakes, and I make plenty of them.-Bobby Orr

by taBruiser on Nov 20, 2009 4:47 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Probably Bickell.

Ebbett, according to Bob McKenzie, was placed on waivers today. So he’s out regardless, whether it’s to another team, or to Rockford. With Hossa, and permitting some roster-bation when it comes to the top unit, the lines probably look like:

Hossa-Toews-Kane
Sharp-Versteeg-Byfuglien (though I think I’d prefer Sharp in the middle)
Ladd-Madden-Brouwer
Eager-Fraser-Kopecky

Keith-Seabrook
Campbell-Hjalmarsson
Barker-Sopel

by Dr. Ice on Nov 20, 2009 5:22 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

my god

the possibility of Hossa-Toews-Kane has me salivating.

by illinikc33 on Nov 20, 2009 11:47 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Sharpy

Pretty sure he would take the middle. He held that role for a large chunk of last year too.

by Delta0ne1 on Nov 21, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

I actually think Kane and Hossa should be separated. Too much offensive skill overlap.

Buff played with Toews and Kane last year some, and, IMO, if any two guys have had some sort of offensive chemistry this year, it’s been Kane and Buff. Weird, I know, but that’s my take.

Versteeg-Sharp-Hossa would be as good as any #2 line in the league, even if Sharp’s a bit shaky on the dot.

Third line is fearsome.

If the anti-Buff vibe is too strong, swap him with Brouwer, who also played w/ Daydream last year and is showing signs of capturing his AHL scoring potential. Third line would still be big and strong, and Madden can teach Buff hard-nosed hockey.

Considering how distributed the scoring has been though (shout out to the D here too), Q seems content to leave the situation fluid. He has 60 games to fiddlle with this (and the D pairings, which have also been a bit fluid lately with no drop off), and everything’ll have to be rejiggered when (if?) Weapon returns anyway.

by cliffkoroll on Nov 21, 2009 1:06 PM CST up reply actions   0 recs

I am listening

to the afternoon saloon on the internet,and they had Ed Olczyk on for an interview,but he didn’t mentin anything…Jesse Rodgers was on Waddle and Silvy yesterday and i think he said against San Jose next week

by csm on Nov 20, 2009 4:48 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

Circus trip

I know this is usually the trip that’s rough on our boys, but has anyone else noticed the mid-January trip?

Same 2 weeks, but 8 games instead of 6 and from 1 end of the continent to the other twice. That trip scares the shit out of me.

"I fornicate and play hockey, cause ther're the 2 most fun things in cold weather"

by Johnny Lava on Nov 20, 2009 7:44 PM CST reply actions   0 recs

I'm pretty sure

 the Hawks went 5-3 on that trip last year?so i donno howw bad its gonna be….first thing is first,circus trip…..then get Hossa healthy,and then wait for the long trip

by csm on Nov 21, 2009 2:33 AM CST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SBN's home for the Chicago Blackhawks.
Start posting about the Blackhawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

107b_small
Enjoy what we're watching
2603645855_c74e3bb600_t_small
On Goalies and Defense
Illusions
Hawks-Canes game, now with pictures!
Bevis-and-buthead-i-am-the-great-cornholio-magnet-c11755101_small
Keeping in the current spirit
Chicagostadium2_small
Road trip comparison! Goalies and Defensive Numbers

Recent FanPosts

Oatboylogo_small
I come bearing gifts..err...well really just a fun way to play along at home
Small
Not disgruntled just pondering
1635_image_small
Madden on the Trade Block??
Don_roberts_small
Not about the Super Bowl
Dakota_145_small
Dont Worry!! RELAX!! Chill Chicago...
8890997_420x300_mb_art_r0_small
Coyotes @ Hawks - THIRD PERIOD THREAD
4274879183_4099a97512_b_small
Hey, a disgruntled first fanpost!!
Parapa_small
Well, there goes that trade rumor.
Small
REPLACE FOLEY & EDDIE- put excitement back into the game !!
Small
Brendan Witt On Waivers? Yes Please

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head of Cyber Division

N510845930_1072666_9049_small Matthew Dirt

Psycho_weasel_by_psycrowe_2_small SamFels

Chicago_flag_small McClure