Second City Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

The Empire Strikes Back - Detroilet 6, Hawks 1 - Scum lead series 3-1

Embarrassing. Utterly embarrassing.

There's not a lot to say here. The Hawks squandered a golden opportunity with Scum's top center, top defenseman, and top face-off man all scratches, and they gave us their most wretched performance since the infamous Islander game in early March. There's a lot of blame to go around, so let's start, shall we?

 

  • Cristobal Huet - While he was adequete in relief on Friday, Cris squeezed out a big steaming turd of a game this afternoon. Only the Filpula power play goal was one where nothing could be done about it, every other one before it was academic was a save he needed to make, and there were none to be found. The numbers and the eye-test were finally in sync with this one, and Huet showed us why Quenneville has ridden Khabibulin in the post season.
  • Kris Versteeg - Lazy, immature, selfish. The Franzen goal was as a result of Versteeg (you have to earn your exclamation point back, pal), again, making one too many stickhandles while standing still just inside the blue line. Had Havlat not been sent to the dressing room again. he would have been benched, and deservedly so for his selfish minors. He did not move his feet to cut off Hossa at all on his second tally.  A consistently horrendous performance from 32 from start to finish.
  • Joel Quenneville - You were brought in to keep your cool and provide a guiding hand for a young team. Your players saw you lose your composure, and promptly followed suit. That outburst was unacceptable.
  • Ben Eager - Grow up.

No one is without blame for this performance. The most indicting aspect of this abortion of a game is that they made Pierre McGuire sound like a genius, proving his normally idiotic drivel to be right at every opportunity. And while I may regret saying this, there is fortunately at least one more opportunity for these young Hawks. If you're going to go out, don't have it be like this. We demand your best effort of the year on Wednesday, and if you have any dignity left after this afternoon, you should be demanding it of each other.

0 recs  |  Comment 59 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

"Worst call in the history of the sport"

Quenville on the call at the end of the period

"Oh, that's easy. White Sox. I'm not one of these fair-weather fans. You go to Wrigley Field, you have a beer; beautiful people up there. People aren't watching the game. It's not serious. White Sox, that's baseball. South Side." -O'Bama

by Hawk is God on May 24, 2009 5:29 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

it was a pretty bad call

wings were protected all game long. not making excuses, because the hawks lost this one on their own, but the calls were pretty shitty from start to finish

by murphymj on May 24, 2009 5:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

hard to argue with it

still haven’t figured out what Walker did to earn either of his two penalties which both led to PP goals

by Crease Monkey on May 24, 2009 5:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What did Eager do? I was at the game and must have been looking somewhere else I just saw them kick him out.

by Shooby34 on May 24, 2009 6:35 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Not sure

but apparently he was talking shit to the refs, or someone was making threats against someone else? Don’t quote me on it, we were terribly confused towards the end there.

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on May 24, 2009 6:57 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It looked like they were taking him to the box for a love pat after the whistle, and he started mouthing off. Even so, I can only imagine what he said to get a misconduct. That combined with his 2nd misconduct later may mean we’re without him for game 5.

by Mike Martin on May 24, 2009 7:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Watched with 2 educated Wings fans

Yes, I found the only 2 there are (helps that they moved her from Detroit years ago). So we start with them all nervous and upset that Lidstrom and Datsuck are out, think the Hawks will have a huge advantage, even up through the end of the 2nd, they’re not gloating, cause they know what the Hawks are capable of doing.

Shitty game, can’t disagree. Although none of us could figure out wtf was going on at the end of the game or who was getting penalties for what.

They felt bad for me. I felt bad for everyone. And why the fuck did Q put Huet back in? Granted he hasn’t played in ages, but still, he sucked.

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on May 24, 2009 6:56 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Why leave Crawford in to experience that?

The way the Hawks were playing leaving Crawford would have done more harm than good. He had a effective 2nd period and that is good for him to just get some type of playoff experience. Judging by Huet’s performance we may need one goaltender to have some type of confidence heading into Game 5; although I think Khabby, 100% or not, will at least start Game 5!!!

by hawks61 on May 24, 2009 7:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh

OK, that kinda makes sense, but considering Huet let in more, doesn’t that erode his confidence even more? Or worse, open him up to needless injuries? I don’t know, I was just shocked, and also didn’t realize they could pull a goalie and then put him back in.

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on May 24, 2009 7:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What happened out there? And who's to blame?

Huet? Possibly, but I’m not buying it he was nothing more than a sacrificial lamb out there today given the Hawks performance in front of him today. He absolutely had no chance on ANY of those goals…NONE whatsoever! The guilty party was Campbell (aka Phantom 51). Why? Let’s recap. 1st goal-takes a untimely pinch behind the Wings net and throws a time bomb to Sharp who couldn’t control the puck which leads to a 2-on-1 Hossa scores! 2nd goal-decides to pinch again (in the last minute no less) comes back and precedes to let Franzen walk in unmolested and shoot between his legs (heard of block?) which Huet doesn’t see until the last second GOAL! 4th goal (THE KILLER)- after the Hawks score Campbell decides to go for an open-ice hit (WTF Why?) and misses (Not suprising) which leads to Hossa against Versteeg! as a defenceman GOAL and for all intense and purposes this was over!
Campbell has been an absolute flop as a FA and has brought a new low to disappointment for Hawks fans. He was brought in to help the Hawks win, not lose and really has his so-called PP prowless been that impressive?
Lack of dicipline? Well…the young Hawks definitely showed their age and inexperience today but when is enough is enough! The officiating is today’s game was a dreadful disaster with Kevin Pollack losing complete control of all situations and ultimately the game. Versteeg! at least showed some emotion that he was pissed with today’s outcome and was trying-a little too hard- to exact revenge and get the WIngs into a fight-night kind of game which we all know won’t happen (and shouldn’t)! But I have no problems with a player showing their emotions on their sleeve especially in the situation the Hawks found themselves in. Eager and Brouwer? Well the game was over that point.
Granted Huet plays the whole game on his knees and that is a problem but he was hardly to blame for today’s loss he had a lot of help.
To beat the Wings the Hawks have to play their game with composure and take the lead from their captain who was only one that showed up today. Toews can lead but the others must follow if there is to be a Game 6 Saturday Night in Chicago.
Overall a very disappointing day that hopefully won’t be the last game in Chicago!!!

by hawks61 on May 24, 2009 7:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

What game were you watching?

Huet was horrible. He was atrocious. I mean it’s not even a question that he was just plain bad; It’s not even worth discussing. Like Eddie O said (and, BTW, I would be completely fine with that guy never calling a Blackhawks game again . . . I don’t know if he’s overcompensating because he’s the Hawks color analyst, but I believe he needed a surgical procedure to remove his lips from the Wings’ collective asses): Your goaltender needs to make some saves, and Huet did nothing of the sort. While he was not the only one who shit the bed (see Campbell, Brian, Versteeg, Chris, and Eager, Ben), he was the one who opened the floodgates with shoddy play.

The only ones possibly worse than Huet on the ice were the refs. I’m not one to harp on bad refereeing because it usually evens itself out over the course of the game, but this was just absolutely ridiculous. The Wings looked like a soccer team out there, taking dives left and right whenever brushed by a Hawk, and the refs were rewarding that with power plays. Why have a diving penalty in the books when you never, ever call it?

Finally, off the ice, the absolute worst: Pierre and whatever fuckstick he talks with during the intermissions. I honestly cannot believe how these two assholes are on national TV calling a game where they are supposed to be objective observers. My favorite part was this—-while discussing the hit on Havlat, whoever the other guy is says something like this: “The hit was within the letter of the law [i.e. was illegal by the rulebook], but in this situation you have to ignore the law.” Really asshole? So you implicitly admit the hit was illegal, and then make some stupid-ass assertion that we should ‘ignore the rulebook’ because it’s the playoffs? Really? Also, what pissed me off was their ribbing of Campbell for calling it a dirty hit. They then went on to show Campbell’s huge hit when he was a Sabre on that guy from Philly, and saying they were the same. Hm. Seeing that the guy Campbell hit had the puck on his stick, and seeing that Campbell didn’t leave his feet or lead with a forearm to the head . . . I don’t know. I just cannot believe those guys can pretend to be objective observers.

by illinikc33 on May 24, 2009 7:30 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I was commenting to a friend how listening to the Hawks' analyst suck off Detroit was just too much to bear.

STOP IT RIGHT THERE and get your head out of detroit’s ass.

White Sox: looks like we rolled snake eyes.

by vince_ on May 24, 2009 7:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was horrid

I couldn’t bear listening to it, and couldn’t decide if the game or the announcing was worse. Pitiful coverage, reminds me of when I had to watch the Hawks game against the Sharks and listen to the San Jose commentators (who were total whiners, btw).

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on May 24, 2009 7:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

you pretty nailed it exactly…everyone knows he’s the regular Blackhawks analyst so he’s overcompensating to make sure he doesn’t sound too biased. Loved Eddie O last year…this season…not so much.

by Crease Monkey on May 24, 2009 7:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No chance on any of the goals?

Are you nuts? At least 2-3 of them were if not soft, saves that a playoff goalie has to make. They weren’t deflections, or screens.

White Sox: looks like we rolled snake eyes.

by vince_ on May 24, 2009 7:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Better Team Won:

All this name calling sttuff like Detroitlet and Scum?? Wow-Have you thought maybe we’re the better team? Maybe the windy city Hawks will be blown out of the playoffs by a better team. GO WINGS!!!

by Curtisro63 on May 24, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think most of us would admit that is true

doesn’t mean we can’t expect more from our team

"Oh, that's easy. White Sox. I'm not one of these fair-weather fans. You go to Wrigley Field, you have a beer; beautiful people up there. People aren't watching the game. It's not serious. White Sox, that's baseball. South Side." -O'Bama

by Hawk is God on May 24, 2009 10:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ok, Hawk is God. You’re right! You seem respectful. I just don’t like our team being called scum. And our city called Detriolet! I’m actually a Cubs fan here in Michigan. But the name calling should stop. It’s just a game. We know what losing is like here-jobs lost and look at our NFL team. You don’t have to like the Wings but they are NOT scum and our city is tired of being bashed.

by Curtisro63 on May 24, 2009 11:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry guy.. we’re not changing it… Wings will always be Scum…

by Matthew Dirt on May 24, 2009 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

When are the Hawks going to win a Cup??? Yeah, That’s what I Thought!!!

by Curtisro63 on May 24, 2009 11:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you didn’t give me time to answer your question… so how do you know what I thought?

by Matthew Dirt on May 24, 2009 11:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Cause you probably don’t know.

by Curtisro63 on May 24, 2009 11:16 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

of course I don't

We can’t tell the future. Neither can you.

Anyways, if you don’t like our nicknames for your team/city please feel free to stop reading the site because the Wings are and always will be Scum in my eyes. If you can’t the minor trash talk that this is… grow up

by Matthew Dirt on May 24, 2009 11:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They did this to themselves.

Gotta blame all of them today, including the coaching staff. Felt mostly sorry for Huet, as he was left out to dry for the majority of the game (Barker CANNOT defend two-on-ones), although that fourth goal he let in — right after Toews finally brought some hope into the building — was so soft I could’ve blown my allergy-ridden nose on it and not felt uncomfortable. That’s the one that essentially killed the game, in my opinion.

by gmh on May 24, 2009 7:15 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I feel that Huet should have had Franzen’s first goal. He didnt do anything super fancy, just right up and over Huet, who was just chillin on his knees. And as gmh said, the fourth goal was a softy, it again was nothing spectacular, he just out skated the d, and put it right past him.

I agree with Coach Q, that call was atrocious… There has been a surprisingly low level of officiating this playoffs, c’mon Gary B, get on that shit, this is the WCF. Unacceptable.

Also, anybody have any good details as to Havlat/Habis condition. Because i turned off the game promptly at 0:00, to hear any post game. I couldnt stand Pierre gargling any more Wing cum…

by Delta0ne1 on May 24, 2009 7:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Looking at the positive, Kane, Toews, and Sharp just kept skating and trying to make things happen. While the rest of the team imploded, those three guys just kept their sticks on the ice and their skates pointed forward.

I’m more inclined to blame Campbell than Huet for this performance because Huet is essentially a backup and Campbell is a $7M defenseman who has brought more mistakes than benefits to the team this series. His game has always been high-risk, high-reward, but the rewards just aren’t coming.

by J.J. from Kansas on May 24, 2009 8:04 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Burish

played pretty well too. He had a few chances and I think he deserves at least a tiny bit of credit. At the end of the game he got a double minor for roughing, with that scrum at the end, but that’s ok because he didn’t take any dumb penalties during the game unlike his fourth line counterparts.

Obviously he didn’t have an amazing game but complimenting any of the Hawks at this point make me feel a little better, as I’ve had my full on bitchfest about the shit players today already.

Давай!

by Justaminorthreat on May 24, 2009 8:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you're going to bring salaries into the discussion

and still consider Huet a backup, you’re confusing the Blackhawks with the Yankees. For $5.6M or so per season, you’d like to see fewer fat rebounds and the ability to stop a puck every once in a while. If your coach even for a second feels that a guy who hasn’t played an NHL game in a year is a better option than you in a must win game 4 of the conference finals, you have severely fucked up.

by hawksfan21 on May 24, 2009 8:21 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll give you that

Huet had a horrible game. But, a goalie has to be outstanding to stop a 2-on-1 rush. A defenseman has to be bad to cause one. Huet should have gotten that puck that Franzen shot, but Campbell shouldn’t have allowed him to shoot it between his legs. Huet should have taken a better angle on Hossa for the Wings’ fourth goal, but Campbell had no good reason to step up in the neutral zone. Versteeg is a (very good) rookie forward, but he should never have had to defend against an elite scorer like Hossa there. Half of the Red Wings goals could be traced directly to a bad decision or bad play made by Campbell. Huet’s failure to bail him out there earns him a great deal of blame for this loss. I just think Campbell deserves more.

To be fair to Huet, only two of his five goals allowed were off rebounds and those were the two goals that he could be blamed on the least (Filppula and Zetterberg’s PP tallies).

by J.J. from Kansas on May 24, 2009 8:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of people blame Campbell’s excessive pinch for Detroit’s shorty, but that’s on the forwards. You know what kind of player Campbell is, and what he’ll do on the PP if he’s got the space. He’s gonna move in to try and create something. If you see him do that, you’ve got to help back. That never should have been a 2 on 1, maybe a 3 on 2 at worst if our forwards were paying attention.

A lot of people think Campbell’s contract makes him a magnet for their criticism. He did a radio interview after the Vancouver series where he basically said “I want the puck.” He’s a high risk, high reward type of player, and we knew that. Right now he’s taking a lot of crap. Nobody has had a lot of room to complain about Matt Walker lately, because he hasn’t been on the ice much. When you’re among the leaders in ice time, you’re going to be making mistakes. It just happens. Campbell is due for a big Game 5.

by hawksfan21 on May 24, 2009 8:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Huet is paid to be a starter. we just couldn't unload Khabby

"Oh, that's easy. White Sox. I'm not one of these fair-weather fans. You go to Wrigley Field, you have a beer; beautiful people up there. People aren't watching the game. It's not serious. White Sox, that's baseball. South Side." -O'Bama

by Hawk is God on May 24, 2009 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

and for all those upset with 51's play

talk to SJ or Buffalo fans. This isn’t new for him

"Oh, that's easy. White Sox. I'm not one of these fair-weather fans. You go to Wrigley Field, you have a beer; beautiful people up there. People aren't watching the game. It's not serious. White Sox, that's baseball. South Side." -O'Bama

by Hawk is God on May 24, 2009 9:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No doubt

I remember the San Jose-Dallas series from last year. And everytime he was on the ice, the Stars made it a point to pressure him because they knew he’d turn the puck over more often than not.

That’s just part of the package you get with him. Did Tallon overpay for him? Absolutely!

But last summer was the first summer of the new regime and they needed to make a splash in free agency to prove that things weren’t going to be status quo. That having been said, the Huet signing didn’t have to be made.

I’m certain Tallon thought he’d be able to unload Khabby at some point in the season. And when they weren’t able to do that and Huet was very inconsistent…

Defending Big D | TheStarsFans | But a Hawks fan since 1989

by Brandon Bibb on May 24, 2009 10:36 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not surprised

First time posting, have loved reading since I got turned on to it by a friend. I did not see any length of the game, but I did manage to watch the first seven minutes or so while on lunch today at work. From that five minutes I just felt they were going to lose. Last game they came out swinging. Today, they looked like they were at practice or something. Detroit’s “experience” is way overrated in my book. That said, the Hawks immaturity is the one thing that I think has cost them just about every game they lost. Even when they push and succeed, they immediately start the cute shit with way too long passes, snazzy spinoramma’s, refusal to dump and really stupid pinches. Last game, I would panic watching a wing transition start only to be relieved when the camera panned down ice and I saw that both D men had enough brains to let go and back up. Aside from the second period collapse, that was a near perfect game plan that I think they could have beat the wings with over and over. Today, what little I did see included phantom’s way stupid AND ineffective hit that lead to a goal. Like someone above said, I hope the come back and play with dignity.

by NKLHD on May 24, 2009 8:45 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Actually

I’m really disturbed by the lack of a Beard of the Day. That could have caused some of the confusion out on the ice.

I know it’s a holiday weekend and all, but how about an Honest Abe beard?

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on May 24, 2009 9:09 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

we used Abe to open the Flames series.. and yes. I dropped the ball by not getting one up pre-game.

by Matthew Dirt on May 24, 2009 9:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh crap

I am senile. OK, just too many beards to remember on a daily basis.

And now I’m just disturbed by today’s BOTD. ;)

If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning

by Trixietrx on May 24, 2009 10:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

A lot of people think Campbell’s contract makes him a magnet for their criticism.

That is absolutely true. Campbell’s cap hit is bigger than Brad Stuart’s and Niklas Kronwall’s combined cap hit. Both of them are outplaying him in this series. Knowing that his style of play brings inherent risks doesn’t mitigate them when his mistakes cost the team. It’s hard enough to adjust what the other team is throwing at you without having to worry about an unpredictable defenseman on your own team.

by J.J. from Kansas on May 24, 2009 9:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

But did Chicago have the benefits that Detroit had with those guys? One is a homegrown prospect and the other is a reclamation project who doesn’t have the entire weight of the defense on his shoulders and a Cup victory. I mean, they had to overpay to get Campbell, and I think that, overall, it hasn’t been that bad. It helped restore faith in the fanbase that the Hawks were willing to go out and get someone. Huet’s a much larger disappointment for the buck; while he’s made mistakes in this series, Campbell has been serviceable enough outside of Detroit and he’s played a whole bunch more than Huet has.

"Don't touch my dream with your dirty hands!"

by Justice and Rule on May 24, 2009 9:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Scum? Really?

3 of our top players scratched, and we still tkae what looked like an effortless win.
You cry about the commentary. Turn on a game broadcast by ‘vs’ sometime and listen to the Wing-Hating garbage that their broadcasting spews.
Bad Calls. It goes both ways. We just came off of a series against the Ducks; host of the dirtiest player in the league (Pronger) who gets away with murder every chance he gets. There has been some bad calls both ways, but that is the nature of the game. Melting down is not an option, as the WINGS have cleary diplayed in game 4, specifically the 2nd period.
Scum? Really? You are being beat by a superior hockey team. You can disagree with this all you want, but all excuses aside, the scoreboard when the time has run out tells the ultimate story. I would not be ruduced to name calling, especially if I cheered a team that performed like the Hawks did today.

by Lygers on May 24, 2009 9:34 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Scum is a nickname we’ve called the Wings all year.. get over it. We like that it really pisses you off so you’re playing into our hands.. grow up.

Also, go join the Wings blog and comment there.. or at least do something other than come here after Wing victories and gloating.. it’s not welcome and I’m not going to hesitate to ban people.

Everyone else, don’t respond to his comment please.. consider this enough.

by Matthew Dirt on May 24, 2009 9:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

There is a better way to look at this: When you call down the wind, you reap the whirlwind. What do I mean by this? If you draw the eyes of the referees, they’ll look for stuff to call. That’s a fact of life. I’ll admit there were a few bad calls, but when you are being really chippy, the referees aren’t going to let you get away with anything, even the stuff they might normally turn away from.

Why? Because when you’re very obviously getting chippy, penalties take on a new meaning; instead of playing hard, you’re looked at as running guys. You aren’t playing with intensity, you’re playing with anger. Once you give up the perception that you are playing to win, the refs take away the freebies. That’s a simple fact of the game.

Let’s be honest: When that Toews goal came about, the game was still in doubt. It could have gone either way, and things weren’t that bad. But after Hossa scored again, the entire game sort of shifted into “we’re waiting for Game 5”. Experience is often talked about too often and I’m sure you’re tired of hearing about it, but this was a real instance where you can tell the difference between a veteran team and an inexperienced one. Even if you’re playing for the next game, you don’t get chippy; you keep playing hard to try and get some momentum that you can take into the next game.

"Don't touch my dream with your dirty hands!"

by Justice and Rule on May 24, 2009 9:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The most disturbing thing about all of this

It wasn’t Pierre McGuire. (Not having to listen to that twit might have been the only saving grace for those in attendance today.)

The Hawks were outplayed all game, but it seems that they just rolled over and phoned it in after that Hossa goal to take it to 4:1. There was some energy in the building after that — by which I mean that everyone’s heart was still, technically, pumping, and there was some neural activity on the most basic level. But the team showed absolutely nothing of use after that.

The third was just dreadful. We get a powerplay early on — which, if there is to be any hope whatsoever, must be converted. Hawks get one shot on, are slow coming back after the clearance… and then Bolland takes a silly penalty when he can’t get at the puck. The 4-on-4 that followed was Detroit playing catch in our end. Nobody challenging a damned thing that Detroit was trying to do — just like the rest of the game. And then Keith gets called, and Eager gets stupid and thus tossed for doing nothing at all (blame resting entirely on Eager here), and Brouwer takes a silly one a few minutes later, and Zetterberg scores. A few facewashes later — including the departure of Mr. Versteeg — and the warden finally, mercifully comes by and says, “it’s time, son.”

There was no urgency in anything the Hawks did today. If they are going to make this respectable, they have to get some. The silver lining in this tornado is that they know now what lies beyond the next loss. Note: the Hawks have not faced an elimination game yet. Now they get three — if they’re really, really lucky.

WAIT FOR THE WHISTLE!

by Sec 326 Bureau Chief on May 24, 2009 9:53 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Detroit is the superior team, period

This Blackhawk team is in unchartered waters and it is not surprising therefore that they got showed up big time in a playoff game. This was a game that you learn from for the future. And I’m not about to get on Quenville for his mistakes after how much he has meant to the development of this young team in less than a year.

Huet? He isn’t a big time goaltender, period. Dale Tallon made a strategic and a financial mistake by bringing him here. Just imagine how bad things would have gotten this season if Huet was indeed the # 1 goalie as was the original plan by Tallon. We would have gotten into the playoffs by the skin of our teeth (maybe) and would have been 1st roudn exit. I’m not sure what Tallon does next. Something tells me Habby is gone in deference to Huet and his contract. Which will be a very bad thing.

Versteeg? Awful today. And quite frankly awful in several playoff games. The youth excuse doesn’t hold water on the silly mistakes of today.

Eager? Stupid, stupid, stupid. I would assume he won’t play in game 5. The league isn’t going to turn the other cheek on that crap.

Awww, come on guys, it's so simple maybe you need a refresher course. It's all ball bearings ...

by BLou on May 24, 2009 9:54 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm not seeing Eager getting anything but a sternly worded letter

Whether the team actually needs any help in determining that Eager shouldn’t play on Wednesday is another matter. This may be an overreaction, and pending what Havlat feels like on Wednesday there may be no option but to play him. But something’s gotta give here.

Incidentally, I think Niemi is up in northern Finland, getting some fishing in. So we are out of goalie moves at this point.

WAIT FOR THE WHISTLE!

by Sec 326 Bureau Chief on May 24, 2009 10:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

BTW

Q does a horrible Keenan impersonation. The penalties were not the fault of the refs. Frustration. That’s what it was.

WAIT FOR THE WHISTLE!

by Sec 326 Bureau Chief on May 24, 2009 10:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Frustration, yes, but he had a point, maybe?

Most of the people in my section had the same exact reaction as Q when we got back to our seats at the beginning of the second period and — SURPRISE!! — a magically appearing power play for the Red Wings.

by gmh on May 24, 2009 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's very disconcerting

Considering Q has generally been even keeled all season, and I think this was a game where he really needed to keep that going.

But on the other hand, I’m not going to hammer on him for having some frustration come through in one game this year, considering all he’s done for the team all season long. It happens to the best of us.

White Sox: looks like we rolled snake eyes.

by vince_ on May 24, 2009 10:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some good news, perhaps?

Lost in the wake of this clusterfuck was the fact that we (and by we I mean Toews) cashed in on a power play, again. The PP has been producing all series. If only the 5:5 play came up to that standard.

WAIT FOR THE WHISTLE!

by Sec 326 Bureau Chief on May 24, 2009 10:24 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Composure

And I said this in the GDT but I think it bears repeating.

On Friday when Scum had 13 minutes in penalties called against them in the first period, they didn’t lose their’s, despite falling behind, 3-0.

Instead, they kept their game in order, slowly turned the momentum their way, and in just over four minutes, they erased that deficit.

Today, the Hawks get the short end of the officiating stick at the end of the first period and see their coach blow up. They fall behind, 4-1, about five minutes in and it was all downhill from there.

Composure.

That’s the biggest difference between these two teams.

Oh sure, Huet’s netminding was a tremendous letdown after the pre-game announcement that two of Detroit’s biggest skill players and their best grinder were scratches. And there’s the officiating as well.

But you’ve got to block that out. And Detroit’s probably the best team in the league at dealing with that kind of adversity and not letting it affect their game.

Defending Big D | TheStarsFans | But a Hawks fan since 1989

by Brandon Bibb on May 24, 2009 10:32 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

it doesn't hurt

that they’re all robots.

by gmh on May 24, 2009 10:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Indeed. You’d be surprised how far you can get by just giving them the command

goto STANLEY_CUP_FINALS

"Don't touch my dream with your dirty hands!"

by Justice and Rule on May 24, 2009 10:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also Babcock gave them summer reading of books written by players

including
“How to trip over your own feet and draw penalties” -by Toumo Ruttu
“Cheapshot players and don’t answer for them” -Scott Stevens
“The Red Wings guide to being a jackass” -Dino Ciccarelli

"Oh, that's easy. White Sox. I'm not one of these fair-weather fans. You go to Wrigley Field, you have a beer; beautiful people up there. People aren't watching the game. It's not serious. White Sox, that's baseball. South Side." -O'Bama

by Hawk is God on May 24, 2009 11:05 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

WTF?

Versus isn’t NBC, and unfortunately only about 15 people have it across the nation. I haven’t noticed Versus being pro- or anti- any team, unlike NBC and HNIC (which, incidentally, may actually be worse than NBC with their disgusting Canadian homerism).

Also, —-"How to trip over your own feet and draw penalties" -by Toumo Ruttu
=priceless.

by illinikc33 on May 24, 2009 11:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm already thinking next season

Sorry if that sounds overly-pessimistic, but it is true. The future of the Blackhawks is outstanding and this has been a remarkable season of progress and success. Getting our nuts handed to us by Detroit is hardly surprising and hardly something I’m going to cry about. Detroit is the closest thing to a dynasty in professional sports right now. But next year will be a different story in our matchup with them.

Key now is what Dale Tallon can do in the offseason. To me he MUST sign Sami Pahlssen somehow. I think Marty Havlat comes back. But the real intrigue will be at goaltender. No way you can again have $12 million sucked up at goaltender. Huet is not a money goaltender and Crawford and Niemi are both shit. So what therefore do we do?!?

Awww, come on guys, it's so simple maybe you need a refresher course. It's all ball bearings ...

by BLou on May 24, 2009 11:25 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SBN's home for the Chicago Blackhawks.
Start posting about the Blackhawks »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Scum_bubbles_small
Letter to Soupy from Hjalmarsson

Recent FanPosts

Illusions
Here Comes the Power Play (song lyrics)
Small
Past the name calling, why Huet must be on the bench
Small
Hawks Nicknames
Carrcast_small
Introducing myself...
Img00543_small
Chicago Sports Radio Sucks
Flag_small
Idea (Category - Pipe Dream)
Small
Thoughts from a lurker: Goalies, Comments, and Gibberish
Homnhl_small
5 on 5 Play

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Carolina Hurricanes left wing Erik Cole, left, celebrates with Bryan Rodney and Jamie McBain (28) after McBain scored the game-winning goal in overtime against the Pittsburgh Penguins in an  NHL hockey game in Pittsburgh Saturday, March 20, 2010.  Carolina won 3-2 in overtime.(AP Photo/Don Wright)

Insert Obvious March Madness Comparison Here: Canes Beat Pens On OT Buzzer-Beater

Photo link

An Interview With Blue Jackets' Prospect Matt Calvert

Eric Nystrom, left, and Mikael Backlund of the Calgary Flames celebrate a goal in the second period of a NHL hockey game March 19, 2010, in Calgary, Alberta. (AP)

Sharks Fizzle Out Again, Lose To Flames, 4-3

More from SBNation.com >


Head of Cyber Division

N510845930_1072666_9049_small Matthew Dirt

Psycho_weasel_by_psycrowe_2_small SamFels

Chicago_flag_small McClure