The Train Kept A-Rollin': Blackhawks Top Ducks 5-2
What an odd game this was. Things got started early with a good drive down the ice by Bobby Ryan but an even better save by Antti Niemi. This would be a common theme throughout the game as Niemi stopped chance after chance by the Duck tonight - at least until the last few minutes.
Regardless, right after the faceoff to start the play again Dustin Byfuglien and Troy Brodie (with a name like that he belongs on some sort of MTV faux reality show, not the NHL) throw down. This was probably one of the staged fights that the NHL is looking to get rid of, made even weirder by the fact that Byfuglien seemed excited and more than willing to pound Brodie with a few good punches before scoring the takedown. The rest of the first was fairly back and forth with the Hawks getting plenty of help from both the outstanding play of Niemi and the always helpful posts.
The second period began much the same as the first - about 6 minutes in the Ducks got a great chance after catching Campbell flat-footed but Niemi came up with an amazing diving pokecheck to keep the puck behind the net allowing the Hawks to start a break away down to the other end. Buff hit Madden along the blue line, Iron Madden saw VERSTEEG! flying down the ice and got him a pass all alone heading to the net. Steeger faked a shot going one way to get Giguere down and sprawling before roofing it over his left shoulder. Only 10 minutes later Kane skated behind the net, absorbed a check and fed the puck Troy Brouwer. Brouwer seemed surprised to find himself a) with the puck and b) so alone that he had time to flub the initial pass, put it on his backhand and fake Giguere again to get the second goal of the game.
The Hawks didn't waste much time to put the game away in the third. Just over a minute in Sharp won a battle along the boards, got a pass to Ladd who fed a wide open Hossa to score the eventual game winner. All this was done with only 4 Hawks on the ice as Barker received a hard hit behind the Hawks net and had trouble getting off. He'd get his revenge later though as he laid a few hard hits on various ducks, including a particularly vicious hit/facewash along the boards to some Duck whose name I can't remember and can't be bothered to look up. Hossa scored again on another power play to extend their streak with the advantage. Daydream Nation teamed up to score the final point before the Hawks took their foot off the gas and allowed something called Petteri Nokelainen to score two goals to end the game.
Random Thoughts:
- The Hawks looked tired tonight and never seemed to get it out of 2nd or 3rd gear. Lucky for them, the Ducks looked just as sloppy and couldn't keep up, even with a clearly worn out Hawks team.
- The game began with James Wisniewski and Ray Whitney slamming into each other about 50 feet away from the puck - I'm going to go out on a limb here and say it was Wiz who was out of position and knocking over his defensive partner.
- Hjalmarsson sat again tonight but Jordan Hendry didn't seem to miss a step. He always seemed to be in position and made a few great passes to set up rushes into the Ducks zone.
- The Hawks were losing the SOG battle through two periods 21 to 18 but again showed their ability to dominate a team in the final period - The Ducks were held to only 3 shots in the third - even with two of them finding a way in, they would have needed 5 shots to at least tie the game.
- Scott Niedermayer added another -2 to his dismal season - it's only a matter of time until he just starts killing his teammates for ruining his legacy.
- If Buff keeps it up - it's definitely looks like we're seeing a player set out to prove something to Brian Burke. We welcome it.
Player of the Game:
When the game was close, there was one player that kept the Hawks in the game - so I'm going to have to give the honor to the backup goalie who came incredibly close to drawing even with Ryan Miller and Ilya Bryzgalov for a league leading 5 shutouts, despite only having played in 13 games so far.. wow.

We can't go without giving credit to the Blackhawks though for letting Harvey Wittenberg take over the PA calls for Gene Honda - a nice subtle move that I'm sure plenty of hardcore fans will appreciate.
Oh and by the way, we're going to keep doing this until it stops working - it's your soundtrack to a paddlin'
0 recs |
83 comments
|
Comments
Is Harvey Wittenberg
Permanently taking over for Gene Honda?
by tazerphaneuf on Jan 4, 2010 12:22 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Gene sounded raspy, guess he was ill.
by MaverickNJ on Jan 4, 2010 12:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, he definitely sounded sick.
Funny when Harvey tried pronouncing “Artyukhin”
by Hawk_GolfeR21 on Jan 4, 2010 10:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wittenberg was good
but maybe it’s just 8 combined seasons of sox & hawks season tickets that make me want good ole gene
by SLoop on Jan 4, 2010 12:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll take Harvey
over Gene anytime, Yes it’s a Chicago Stadium thing. Some great nights under the influence and missing the troughs.
Enjoy the silence!
by thepuckstopshere on Jan 4, 2010 6:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Harvey is the man!
Wish we could clone him and be rid of Gene Honda, who sounds like every other bush league PA guy in the NHL and NBA.
"...about six feet from the moose's butt."
by The Fearless Freep on Jan 4, 2010 10:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Harvey
It looks like this was Harvey’s first of the year. He filled in a few times last year. “Blackhawk goal, on the power play, scored by…” It still brings chills. Or “One minute to play in the period”
by Beltway Hawks on Jan 4, 2010 7:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What's with all the Gene Honda hate?
At least he can pronounce the players’ names. I don’t like when Harvey calls games.
by Sportsgal on Jan 4, 2010 10:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I know...i didn't realize he wasn't liked before.
It’s nice to hear Wittenberg call the games, but Honda’s great.
I be on my green like Irish Spring.
by chrome on Jan 4, 2010 11:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No offense to Harvey
I’m just a creature of habit and don’t like it when things get switched up. They did that during the playoffs and it bothered me. Probably because when it comes to hockey, I am irrationally superstitious.
by Sportsgal on Jan 4, 2010 11:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I love Gene
His voice is awesome.
The power play is still f**king clown shoes
Everybody...HIT SOMEBODY! ~ the Chicago Rush are back in April 2010
by HappyHuman on Jan 4, 2010 6:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Great game
Great choice for player of the game, he sure bailed Hendry out early on after a bad giveaway.
Good to see Hossa get goals…yep, goals w/ an “s”…when it rains, it pours for that guy, wow!
What Sopel may lack in speed (and looks, for that matter), he sure makes up in “touch my goalie again and I’ll kick your ass” fire.
Did the cameraman HAVE TO cut to the foursome doing the fist-pumps after every Hawks goal? They should be quarantined, stuff like that can be scary contagious.
Lastly, Brouwer ALWAYS looks surprised to have the puck, but at least it’s “ohmygodohmygodohmygodyes!” Brouwer w/ the puck.
by radguy213 on Jan 4, 2010 1:12 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Foursome
I could see them from my 300 level seats across the ice and it caused me to cringe every time the Hawks scored. I can only hope that shit doesn’t catch on in the 100 level…
by ElijahJones22 on Jan 4, 2010 7:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. Gene takes a lot of shit. I think he does a pretty damn good job, good home team intensity without being absurd like the guy in Dallas the other night POWERRRRRRRRRRRRR PLAYYYYYYYYYYYY. Anyway, you know the Hawks are good when this is my biggest concern since the power play appears to be abandoning it’s status as fucking clown shoes.
by tazerphaneuf on Jan 4, 2010 1:15 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hossa
Makes the game look effortless. Every time he’s on the ice, your attention is drawn to him. It’s been said before, and will be said again, but he is the caliber of player that’s not been seen in an indianhead sweater in a long, long, time.
Bears, Beets, Battlestar Galactica.
by AirTrafficAJ on Jan 4, 2010 1:25 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Nothing like a great Slovak wearing four feathers, be it 81 or 21…
his passes are amazing, he always puts it on the other guys tape… if Versteeg could only learn how to do that… (sigh)
by Byfuglie33 on Jan 4, 2010 8:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
RUMOR ALERT>>>>>RUMOR ALERT
Altanta Thashers’’s Kovalchuk, who is making $7.5 million this season.
One surprise is the Chicago Blackhawks, who supposedly would give up Kris Versteeg(notes) and Cam Barker(notes), which would save the cash-strapped Blackhawks $6 million next season.
Source=Yahoo Sports
http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/rumors/post/Thrashers-Kovalchuk-headed-to-Chicago-;_ylt=AvGjKQqeN2z5HbalDgreR2I5nYcB?urn=nhl,211579
"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson
by ccm on Jan 4, 2010 5:10 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I’m torn on this. Kovalchuk is prolific, but the team is just fine the way it is right now. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
by Dave Jameson on Jan 4, 2010 6:04 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wasn't that the thought process of that one team on the lakeshore the last couple of seasons?
I am torn as well, however if it means the cup residing on Madison for an extended period of time making the move is a necessity.
It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Albert Einstein
by Novy on Jan 4, 2010 6:40 AM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
When growth ends, decay begins. Just ask my dentist!
Enjoy the silence!
by thepuckstopshere on Jan 4, 2010 6:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
as a 6 month rental, maybe not
but if we could give them Buf too & free up enough to sign Kovalchuk for a couple years … then hell yes!
by krome on Jan 4, 2010 7:35 AM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
If that's possible
then I’m all for it, I just don’t think its likely to happen. I’m sure Kovalchuk will be wanting Ovechkin type money.
by Dave Jameson on Jan 4, 2010 7:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I am leery of signing him to a couple of years due to a couple of factors
1. The amount of $ he will want at years end, especially if they win the cup.
2. It will limit the ability of the team to resign/extend some of the core players that seem to be necessary to building a perennial cup contender.
Trading for Kovy will be a sign that all chips are in the pot for this year, and will get the team some return on the trades even if it is for only 6 months. Compare that to trying to dump salary later the team will be lucky to get pennies on the dollar since every team knows what fiscal situation Bowman is in.
It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Albert Einstein
by Novy on Jan 4, 2010 8:14 AM CST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
The goal
is to win the Cup. After this season we HAVE to shed salary. It is not an option; we have to do it. The question becomes: who better helps you win the Cup this year, any 2 of Steeg/Buff/Barker or Kovi? I think the clear answer is Kovi, at least when it comes to the 2 forwards. That guy is one of the best in the biz, while Steeg and Buff are 2 role players.
by illinikc33 on Jan 4, 2010 8:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’d rather have Ladd, Seabrook and Sharp signed up again than Kovi… If the Hawks do get Kovi before the deadline I think he’ll be a rental player, nothing more. But I also thought they were only going to sign Hossa to a one-year deal…
by Matthew Dirt on Jan 4, 2010 8:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
maybe the master capologist can make it work.
by G8K33P3R on Jan 4, 2010 9:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
exactly what I was thinking
I’m down for Kovi as a rental this year, but signing him to a deal after that would compromise our defensive corps…..seabrook and hammer.
The real question is, do the hawks have enough for a cup as currently constructed? If the answer is yes, it would be better to trade some of the aforemetioned guys for draft picks rather than having Kovi for a few months.
"In an ideal world I would have all 10 fingers on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching."
by hackerar on Jan 4, 2010 9:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i agree w/ you in that i'd rather sign those 3
than kovi to long-term. i meant i’d be fine w/ him for a rental to get cap room
by illinikc33 on Jan 4, 2010 1:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would agree...but...
…my concern, believe it or not, is giving up Barker. Not that I think Barker is the shit or anything, because we have Hendry to fill in right now in his place. The problem is if one of our D-men get hurt, we have NOTHING in the pipeline. NOTHING.
If there’s an injury, do you want to go into the playoffs where you’re 4-5-6 defensemen are Sopel, Hendry, and Jassen Cullimore? Gulp.
Now, if we can add in a draft pick or two and get a defenseman back with Kovi, then I’m more interested, since we’d have the salary space after shedding Buff, Barker,and Versteeg.
It really is a great question that I have been torn over.
But he’d definitely be a rental.
by GenPabloSecobar on Jan 4, 2010 10:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Opps
STEEGER! I know he makes some turnovers but I really like what he brings. The little guy is crazy and makes some good plays. I just like the chemistry and why fix what isn’t broken?? If they take Barker and Buff I’d do it but not Steegs!
by Jrs23 on Jan 4, 2010 4:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know what to think about this, to be honest
On one hand, we won’t need as many players as we do come playoff time: Bolland and Burish will be back, we can probably call up Bickell and anyone from the farm who may or may not have done the Skille Shuffle. Some people WILL be gone after this year, so the question becomes who they are and if we need them for playoffs— and is one playoff run worth it? Would we be better off trading them for draft picks and prospects instead, keep investing in the future? Go for broke now (it isn’t a certainty) or be a little more conservative with what we wager?
The biggest concern I have is how well Kovalchuk will perform in the playoffs. The Sharks know too well how the best players can forget to show up for a series, after all. Of course, is that risk that big when we have a team that CAN potentially roll four lines anyway?
by chiblackhawks on Jan 4, 2010 10:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hendry
I disagree with that part. I think he’s a great addition to the team, don’t get me wrong, and usually love to see him out there, but I thought he was trying to get a little too “offensive” for his own good last night which at some point he may be able to make work, but don’t think it works quite yet, or while being paired with Soupy.
I really would like to see him paired with Sopel though, to see how that would work. Just call me Mrs. Q.
If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning
by Trixietrx on Jan 4, 2010 8:05 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Barker
I thought Barker only came back out once more for a shift after he limped off during the Hossa goal. Maybe on that one shift he creamed a bunch of guys and decided to take the rest of the night off, after all he still wound up playing more than twice as much as the night before, but I got the sense that he was banged up moreso than delivering banging.
by Scott13 on Jan 4, 2010 8:50 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I don’t remember seeing Barker at all after that hit. Maybe one shift? I thought he laid someone out earlier in the 2nd period.
by hoorock89 on Jan 4, 2010 11:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m almost positive I saw him lay someone out later in the game after taking that hit – but now looking at his TOI I see it was very low, so yeah, I may be wrong…
by Matthew Dirt on Jan 4, 2010 8:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no, I saw him after that hit
But he may have lasted only one shift. I definitely didn’t see him afterward.
by chiblackhawks on Jan 4, 2010 8:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately, I pay way too much attention to Barker :)
So from what I remember Foley and Edzo saying was it looked like he had a hard time getting off the ice that first time (thought i don’t remember seeing what happened), then I could have sworn they said he was out on the ice again, but it didn’t last long. And I forgot if he took another hit or what or if he just wussed out.
If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning
by Trixietrx on Jan 4, 2010 9:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
See, paying attention to Barker does no one any good
I missed the first Hossa goal because I was too busy worrying as I watched him skate to the ice. I don’t even like the guy either, haha. After that I swore to ignore him, so I did. :|
by chiblackhawks on Jan 4, 2010 10:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But, in my defense,
I keep wait to hear those magic words “and Barker has been traded.”
If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning
by Trixietrx on Jan 5, 2010 1:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Kovalchuk would be nice, but don’t we have scoring more than covered? I mean, when you have more than five players on your team with ten goals or more, adding another scorer seems almost like adding sugar to Pepsi.
And yes, watching the Panda is a treat. The way he handles the puck is just amazing. Just think, when Kaner learns how to do this as well as Panda ( not that he’s not doing a good job now) this team will be ridiculous.
He Gone!
by chisoxgirl5 on Jan 4, 2010 9:06 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I thought it was a nice
gesture sending the fourth line on a long PP shift late in the third, after another inferior team gave us a power play by running our goalie late in the game.
While it would’ve been nice giving Hossa the chance at a natural hat trick, its nicer to reward the 4th line with another great game, while keeping it classy for a not-always-classy opposition.
I be on my green like Irish Spring.
by chrome on Jan 4, 2010 9:41 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
VERSTEEG!
I’m probably harder on Steeger than anyone, but is there anyone on this team with better hands and patience when in tight on a goalie (maybe Hossa or Toews)? Just some of the goals he scores when there isn’t much room are impressive……….1) last night’s 2) the pittsburgh OT winner, 3) a goal from last year in which he was at the side of the net……spun, dragged a puck from backhand to forehand and roofed a shot (I wanna say it was against Vancouver, regular season). Sure some of the plays he tries to make in tight can be a little too cute for his own good, but man when he pulls them off…….
"In an ideal world I would have all 10 fingers on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching."
by hackerar on Jan 4, 2010 10:11 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
True, but to me it is like the spin-O-rama, when it is done right, it is something to cheer about. Most times it just ends up being a mess.
SHOOOOOOOT!!!! Anon
by burpchelischili on Jan 4, 2010 10:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nice Summary Dirt
The Duck D has gone all soft. VERSTEEG! and Brouwer enjoyed picnics in front of the net.
Anyone else notice the Hossa-Keith connection in the offensive zone? Not just on the goal dumbshit, but all night.
That makes three blown shutouts (in SJ and v. Preds), and five meaningless goals allowed to spoil ‘em. That’s 10 virtual shutouts out of 42 games. The reality is that the Hawks goal-differential understates the true state of affairs.
by cliffkoroll on Jan 4, 2010 10:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
add Pittsburgh to the blown shutouts
Was there at the game and man, Jordan Staal’s goal in the last minute, when they pulled Fleury for 6 attackers, just took the life out of me.
by chiblackhawks on Jan 4, 2010 11:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Kovalchuk
With all the line changes Q has been making this year, adding one guy to replace the two or three we’d trade away sounds like a nightmare. Just picture it – we bring Kovy in two months before the playoffs start… Q puts together three or four line combos over the course of about three week’s worth of games… finally gets one that seems to work and then Bolland comes back. Now the lines get juggled again to fit Bolland in with the right forwards.
This has “bad” written all over it.
by Sportsgal on Jan 4, 2010 10:38 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Kovalchuk
With all due respect, wasn’t the Wisniewski trade supposed to throw everything into disarray because it was going to alter team chemistry? Granted, Pahlsson didn’t work out as hoped but this team did not skip a beat. I don’t think that the psyche of this team is fragile enough that a few personnel moves are going to derail the train.
There will be a glut of forwards once Bolland and Burish come back and roster moves are going to need to be made regardless. Losing depth at D-man could hurt, but when you’ve got top-two pairings that soak up the minutes like they do, you should be able to survive 10-12 minutes of Joe Schmo on the ice.
Getting another elite scorer in return for moves that are going to need to be made next year anyway doesn’t necessarily seem like a bad idea…
by JKline3 on Jan 4, 2010 10:48 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Not sure if you're addressing the "chemistry" thing towards me
But I’ll respond anyway. In no way was I suggesting the line changing being an issue due to team “chemistry.” If three guys are able to pass, shoot and score together, it doesn’t really matter whether or not they’re BFFs in the locker room. I don’t think bringing in Kovy would shatter the fragile locker room spirit. I think it would make Q do things he doesn’t need to do, and that’s what bothers me.
Everyone loves to bring up the Wiz trade, but I honestly don’t recall that many people being up in arms over the move. I was sad to see Wisniewski go, but I also knew our team wouldn’t miss his performance. And whether or not you want to admit it, the team chemistry was altered after he left. It took the team at least three our four games to get back on the right track after Wiz was gone. That being said, three or four games of being off isn’t a big deal (unless it’s the playoffs).
by Sportsgal on Jan 4, 2010 11:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Let the wild Kovalchuk rumpus start
next week. The Fourth Period says he’s going to make his decision on returning to the Thrashers by next Monday. So I guess I’ll have plenty of time to come up with nicknames for what could be the opposite of Capocalypse. Kovi-Palooza. Koval-fest 2010. Illya 2K10.
http://BlackhawksDL.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/BlackhawksDL
by Original Six on Jan 4, 2010 11:33 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ooooopppsss
link: http://www.thefourthperiod.com/news/atl100103.html
http://BlackhawksDL.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/BlackhawksDL
by Original Six on Jan 4, 2010 11:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Man I suck
It says this week. Not next week. Reading things before posting would be a good idea, eh?
http://BlackhawksDL.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/BlackhawksDL
by Original Six on Jan 4, 2010 11:36 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So, you now want to be different from the rest of us?
SHOOOOOOOT!!!! Anon
by burpchelischili on Jan 4, 2010 12:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
why trade.
Leave this team be, they look like they finally are clicking to be a scoring machine, if we trade then we start from scratch again. Wait till the season is over.
by redtribe14 on Jan 4, 2010 12:37 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Fuck Kovalchuk, Get Neidermayer
If you ask me the ’Hawks are more in need of another veteran defenceman and with Neidermayer supposedly available he would be the best fit for this team. Gosh only knows how someone like Barker could benefit playing alongside a future H.O.F. like Neidermayer.
The intangibles that Niedermayer would bring are abound. Everywhere at every level Scott Neidermayer has won. Whether it be Conn Smythe’s, Norris Trophies, Stanley Cup’s, Gold Medal’s the man has done it all and why wouldn’t he want to finish his career with another Stanley Cup alongside great friend John Madden? His leadership would just add another dimension that would make the ‘Hawks a supreme favourite to win it all. His role wouldn’t be overwhelming as he’d be expected to fill the shoes of one Cam Barker or Brent Sopel – something he should do with ease.
Add to the fact he has only one year remaining on his current deal so the ‘Hawks wouldn’t be saddled with another long-term deal and with his retirement most likely it would be apparent the ‘Hawks wouldn’t be interested in bringing him back unless he’d want one more and was willing to play for a meager contract of 1 year/ $1 million.
Now add to the equation that it wouldn’t cost the ‘Hawks much in the terms of what we’d give the other way. Look we all realize that the ‘Hawks will have to give up some players at season’s end but why give them up for a rental player? If anything Stan should make sure that when players like Byfuglien, Versteeg, and Barker get shipped out the ‘Hawks would receive the maximum in return to ensure the long-term success of this franchise. Giving all of them up for just a 3-month rental player wouldn’t be in best interest of this franchise in the long run.
It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!
by hawks61 on Jan 4, 2010 12:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Neidermayer is at 6.0 million - and is a UFA after this season
according to nhlnumbers.com anyway.
We’d still need to dump 2 of Steeg, Buf & Barker (or some other combo of salaries).
by krome on Jan 4, 2010 1:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There has been instances in the past where the team trading the player ate some of the incurring salary just so the trade could be made. I’m sure Bob Murray and the Ducks organization would have no problems eating some of Niedermayer’s contract to ensure his possibility to win another Stanley Cup given what he has accomplished in his career and with the Ducks. Mind you the league would look at the situation but I don’t think the league would ultimately void a deal nulling Neidermayer of this kind of opportunity.
In the end it would cost the ’Hawks an additional $1.5 million extra to their cap considering it would be for only 20 games worth (25% of the full contract). They may want Barker in return but that would be about it with a draft pick (3rd to 4th round) and Neidermayer coming back our way.
It's never about the eventual destination, but rather the long journey and its challenging obstacles that are presented and what it takes to overcome them, that makes the taste of success all the more worthwhile!!!
by hawks61 on Jan 4, 2010 1:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
eating salary
i don’t think it’s possible for a team to eat salary. i realize that things like that happen in football and baseball, but not in hockey. brian burke made the proposal to allow this in 2006 and every year since, but it’s never been passed:
http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/morrison/2007/11/burkes_proposal_has_merit_but.html
so regardless of the want, we’d still need to clear the same 6 million for neidermeyer as kovi.
by modnar on Jan 4, 2010 1:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As far as I know
The Eating of Salary is Strictly Prohibited in the NHL. As is the No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service policy.
Bears, Beets, Battlestar Galactica.
by AirTrafficAJ on Jan 4, 2010 3:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bluto: What the fuck happened to the Delta I used to know?
Where’s the spirit? Where’s the guts, huh? “Ooh, we’re afraid to go with you Bluto, we might get in trouble.” Well just kiss my ass from now on! Not me! I’m not gonna take this. Wormer, he’s a dead man! Marmalard, dead! Niedermeyer…
Otter: Dead!
Enjoy the silence!
by thepuckstopshere on Jan 4, 2010 3:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was born after 1980
Can someone explain this to me?
by meeshak on Jan 4, 2010 11:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, I haven’t seen Animal House since I was, like, 10.
by meeshak on Jan 5, 2010 12:03 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
At least tell me
You’ve seen the Blues Brothers.
You really do need me to be your mom apparently.
And, listen to Dirt, he knows what’s best for you.
If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning
by Trixietrx on Jan 5, 2010 1:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I kind of like the idea of going after Neidermayer instead of Kovalchuk; seems to me the offense is fine as is, plus when Bolland comes back we’ll have our #2 C and be able to move Sharp back to wing.
Q also needs to stop putting a forward on the PP point, especially Buff. Ducks had a 2 on 1 chance last night against Buff and he did what I’ve seen the Hawks’ D do too many times, which is flop down on his stomach and wave his stick. That’s the worst thing a Dman can do, he’s giving the attackers all the advantage, leaving himself no options and his goalie is now facing a 2 on 0.
by Ryan! on Jan 4, 2010 1:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
The Hawks D sucks!
"Stay thirsty my friend"
by laaarmer on Jan 4, 2010 1:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Add an S to friend
and I wish I could lick them chicks he’s with!
Enjoy the silence!
by thepuckstopshere on Jan 4, 2010 3:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would have to have more than one actual friend
"Stay thirsty my friend"
by laaarmer on Jan 5, 2010 8:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think I agree
I get a little lost on the cap stuff and how the trades will work prior to year end, but i definitely think it’s our D that needs more help.
If I can't be a good example, I'll just be a horrible warning
by Trixietrx on Jan 4, 2010 2:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I may be wrong but
The Ducks paying part of the money wouldn’t change the fact that his salary would be on the Hawks books, meaning we would need to cut salary to get under the cap. Teams just pay some of the money to intice their trade partner
by ChargingMajor on Jan 4, 2010 1:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Happens to the best of us.
But sending cash in a trade is in direct violation of the CBA. Its an effort to keep big market teams from buying players.
http://BlackhawksDL.wordpress.com
http://twitter.com/BlackhawksDL
by Original Six on Jan 4, 2010 4:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It ain't Van Halen without Mike Anthony.
Just sayin’ :P
Great game last night, lots of crowd energy, good to hear Harvey call a Hawks game on the PA, and also very nice to see Hossa score the two goals on his bobblehead day. It was my fifth game of the season but my first seeing Hossa play in person for the Hawks so it was definitely a nice experience. The team seemed rather sloppy at points but hey, a win is a win.
As for Kovalchuk, I’d much rather see us go after Neidermayer. He’s a UFA and I think his price tag would be less. I personally don’t see much of a need for Kovalchuk right now.
However, I’m all for leaving things the way they are right now. We’re tied with San Jose for most points in the NHL, it obviously ain’t broke, so let’s not fix it. We did all the repair we needed to when we signed Hossa and Madden.
by ZachenFoot on Jan 4, 2010 3:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Versteeg Promotion?
Hey everyone. Sorry to derail your discussion slightly, but I just had a couple questions about Versteeg’s recent play. Given that he seems to have bounced back from his earlier slump (seeing as I’m a Stars fan first and Hawks fan 2nd, I naively base that solely on his 4 game point streak), does anyone see him being promoted back to the top 6? Or at least keeping his production up on the 3rd line? The lines seem to be rolling on all cylinders right now, so it seems unlikely that a move would be made out of necessity, but just wondering about your input seeing as I don’t get to watch any Hawks games unless they’re playing Toronto.
On another derailing note, I’ve been lurking around here for awhile and love what you all have going. Keep it up!
by LilEagle on Jan 4, 2010 7:05 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
hard to say where steeger fits
It’s hard to say now, when Burish and Bolland get back, it will be even tougher to see where he fits in.
Come March, it wouldn’t surprise me to see Versteeg get a shot with Bolland and Hossa for a couple reasons: 1) There is a growing sentiment (and rightfully so) that we’ll see Hossa reach his full potential on Bolland’s wing, and a guy with decent playmaking and sniping abilities like Versteeg could be a decent fit. 2) I may be reaching here, but Sharp seemed to have a bit of chemistry with Burish and Eager late last year (after returning from injury) and I think Sharp could handle a fourth line role, and I just don’t see Versteeg playing down on that line. Obviously, after the season, Versteeg’s role will become more clear, whether that be a good thing for him or not.
All I know is, I like Kane-Toews-Brouwer…….alot. They’re getting it done even strength and on the powerplay. It would also be nice to see Madden in a full checking line capacity, with maybe Ladd and Buff.
"In an ideal world I would have all 10 fingers on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching."
by hackerar on Jan 5, 2010 9:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















