Kovy to Chicago: The Anatomy of a Rumor
I understand the excitement promised by having Kovalchuk don the Indianhead, even if it's only for six months, but before any collective wetting of pants happens, allow me to remind everyone the facts of the case:
Pierre LeBrun said:
My guess is you'll see the usual suspects inquire about Kovalchuk, teams such as Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Boston and several others, but an NHL executive from a Western Conference team told me recently he wouldn't be surprised if the Chicago Blackhawks got involved.
If you're like me, you're probably surprised to hear that given the Blackhawks' cap issues; but that's exactly the point, the executive said. The Hawks could bolster their Stanley Cup chances by adding a superstar rental like Kovalchuk (who is set to become an unrestricted free agent July 1), but at the same time, alleviate their pending offseason cap headaches by sending a pair of salaried players to Atlanta (let's say, for example, Cam Barker and Kris Versteeg).
Now, I want to stress, this is a theory. There haven't been any talks between the Thrashers and Hawks because Atlanta has been focused on re-signing Kovalchuk. But it's an interesting theory, no?
As you can tell from the parts I bolded, a) this theory stems from a source not necessarily connected with the Blackhawks, and b) this is, in fact, just a theory. Nobody on either side has commented one way or another, and whether the Blackhawks are actually interested remains to be seen. LeBrun made the comment on HotStove, which sparked everyone's imagination (yours truly included) but what he failed to reiterate on air he did stress on paper.
Of course, more people watch than read, so if you would allow me to demonstrate:
The BleacherReport puts out an article:
If there isn’t an agreement, the Thrashers could move fairly quickly into the trade market, where Kovalchuk would undoubtedly become one of the hottest commodities available. A couple analysts believe the Blackhawks could sneak in and acquire him as early as this week.
[...]
A rumor that has been on the outside of the Kovalchuk rumor mill, which has been at least warm if not piping hot all season, is that the Blackhawks might jump into the mix and snatch the star left wing quickly.
ESPN’s Pierre LeBrun wrote of the rumor in his latest blog, citing a rival Western Conference GM that says adding Kovalchuk might be not only a great move for the 2009-10 Blackhawks, but also help relieve the payroll in 2010-11 as well.
Two names have been central to most of the rumors surrounding Kovalchuk: Kris Versteeg and Cam Barker. Unloading both young players wouldn’t be easy to stomach, but the impact on the Blackhawks could be incredible.
What follows is the sort of armchair GM-ing we're all familiar with, citing why Barker & Versteeg are indeed decent trade baits for Kovalchuk, and what Ilya would, in turn, bring to the table.
But note, again with the help of my bolded lines, how the rumor has gone from LeBrun (a fairly credible source, else we wouldn't be in a tizzy like we are) putting forth a theory to a couple of analysts who believe Kovalchuk is the Hawks' to steal. Then he goes on to say Versteeg and Barker are names most central to the rumors surrounding this possible trade.
Understand, though general opinion of the Bleacher Report is the way it is, I'm not saying that this article is wrong. It did cite LeBrun, including LeBrun's source (though it assumed, wrongfully or not, that the executive in question is a GM) and it did clearly say that these are all rumors. What I find rather interesting is that I have yet to come across any of these analysts mentioned who believe the Blackhawks could pull off the trade. Even LeBrun is hesitant to give the possibility more credence, but then again, what is an analyst other than a person who analyzes things? The way it is, unless these analysts are named, they could stand for any one of us who posted at least a two-paragraph comment when the link to the HotStove segment was posted as a fanshot. (Granted, maybe I've missed some other article-- if I have, do let me know.)
Of course, this is just the Bleacher Report, and who pays attention to the rumors here?
Yahoo!Sports Rumors, apparently:
The Los Angeles Kings, Boston Bruins, and Philadelphia Flyers, among others, appear to be probable destinations for Kovalchuk, who is making $7.5 million this season.
One surprise is the Chicago Blackhawks, who supposedly would give up Kris Versteeg(notes) and Cam Barker(notes), which would save the cash-strapped Blackhawks $6 million next season.
Notice how, through sourcing and sourcing and paraphrasing, we have gone from quite comfortably from
1. A Western Conference executive telling LeBrun he thinks the Blackhawks would benefit from going after Kovalchuk;
to
2. A Western Conference GM told LeBrun the Blackhawks would benefit from going after Kovalchuk, something a few analysts believe they could do this week, possibly with Barker and Versteeg as trade bait;
to
3. The Blackhawks would supposedly give up Versteeg and Barker for Kovalchuk.
That's in three articles over the weekend. Now I don't know who the Voice of Valeri is, let alone Valeri, but the following quote is from an article they linked to on Twitter (which I came across while searching for Kovalchuk):
The Bleacher Report reports that the Thrashers have offered F Ilya Kovalchuk both 10 and 12-year contracts, which appear to be final offers, before the team begins to actively shop him. One team that ahs expressed a lot of interest are the Blackhawks, and as of right now, they appear to be the frontrunners. Kovalchuk is in the final year of a deal paying him $7.5M, with a cap number of $6.4M.
Frontrunners? Interested? You don't say.
If Kovalchuk doesn't sign with the Thrashers today (and hang on a second here, but who says today is the deadline before Waddell starts looking at trade as an option? Am I supposed to try and go down another rabbit hole to track this one too?), can you imagine what this will look like at the end of the week? Not only is Stan Bowman burning the wires trying to get Kovalchuk to Chicago, but he'd have reportedly offered Byfuglien, Skille, and his first-born too, so he gets contract negotiation rights when Kovalchuk's current one runs out.
All this because some suit in the Western Conference was talking with Pierre LeBrun and said, "Now wouldn't it be interesting if..."
Wouldn't it be interesting, indeed.
EDIT: I forgot to mention the following:
1. The irony that the most accurate sourcing of the rumor I have seen is in an article that isn't even about the rumor alone.
2. Lost in the chain-of-articles mentioned above is The Fourth Period's take on the situation, which I read but failed to catch in my morning reading, but which didn't pass the Puck Daddy screen test:
The Chicago Blackhawks are among the teams supposedly interested in Kovalchuk. According to CBC, the Hawks would be willing to part with some of their high-priced players, such as Cam Barker and Kris Versteeg, in an attempt to fix their cap problems.
Which only demonstrates my point beautifully. The Fourth Period, arguably a more credible source of information than the Bleacher Report, has gone beyond reporting this as a rumor to reporting it as a fact, inaccurately citing sources along the way and thus adding a layer of credibility that should by no means be there at all.
22 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent post
This should be required reading for anybody (like myself) who still tends to get way too excited over trade rumors. Count me among the many who would love to see Kovi in Chicago, if only for a Cup run, but I’m not holding my breath.
One question
What is the net gain in players alone (let’s leave money out of this) in any type of trade this season? Bear in mind we will still be getting Bolland and Burish back later this seaon, which is almost like a trade in it’s self.
Giving up multiple usefull pieces for that “one great player” in a quest for a championship tends to backfire.
I’d rather keep everyone we have and worry about the cap during the offseason. (hopefully with the Cup)
"I fornicate and play hockey, cause ther're the 2 most fun things in cold weather"
You raise a good point
and, yeah, I’d hate to risk doing anything to mess with the chemistry of this team (which is one of it’s biggest strengths).
Still, it’s tantalizing to consider what the addition of a 50 goal scorer could mean to this team’s Cup chances.
Just to play devil’s advocate, and not in any way degrade Kovalchuk’s talent, but what are the chances Kovy would be a 50 goal scorer on a team like Chicago? I don’t know a whole lot about Atlanta’s team, but I do believe Chicago is the only NHL team with 6 10-goal scorers at the moment, and I’m curious what the anticipated difference in Kovy’s output would be if he was on a team that spread the puck around more.
considering he'd only be playing in 15 games with the Hawks
not good.
FifthFeather.com
by El Duque's Raft on Jan 4, 2010 10:30 PM CST up reply actions
Some people think the type of offensive output Kovalchuk will bring with him could be downright lethal. It also answers the salary dump that’s coming in the off-season, and would get someone who could be very useful come playoff time.
Of course, that means we’d have bartered young players away for a rental instead of draft picks. Different people will have different opinions about the wisdom in either move.
by chiblackhawks on Jan 4, 2010 10:39 PM CST up reply actions
People keep talking about Bolland coming back like it's a sure thing
let’s wait and see on that one
FifthFeather.com
by El Duque's Raft on Jan 4, 2010 10:47 PM CST up reply actions
Do you go around telling little children that Santa isn't real, too?
(Granted, you have reason to be cautious, but I do not even want to consider the possibility.)
by chiblackhawks on Jan 4, 2010 11:06 PM CST up reply actions
sometimes
seriously though, the hawks have to be 99.999% sure Bolland is coming back if they were ever to make a deal for Kovalchuk. Otherwise, they’ll have a pretty big hole in their lineup with no Bolland and no whomever would be traded.
FifthFeather.com
by El Duque's Raft on Jan 4, 2010 11:18 PM CST up reply actions
what makes me optimistic
is how slow the Blackhawks seem to be taking the process. 12-16 weeks seems to be the normal time for recovery, and for the average person, not the superhuman athletes who almost force themselves to get better with half the time allowed. Of course, we don’t know if this is because of the gravity of the situation or just a precautionary measure, but I’d like to believe it’s the latter.
by chiblackhawks on Jan 4, 2010 11:33 PM CST up reply actions
This is a superb post!
Major kudos to chiblackhawks for illustrating what “news” has become in this digital age.
by LordStanleyOfPreston on Jan 5, 2010 6:42 AM CST reply actions
Anyone with a blog and time spent on capgeek can wind up being the Ground Zero of any rumor (I’m living proof of that). Hell, who hasn’t played some numbers game to figure out how to get Kovalchuk here?
Larger organizations, whether it be ESPN, Sports Illustrated, TSN, CBC, etc. should at least take a few minutes to drill down to the source of something like this. There is no blogger following the Hawks who has any kind of access to anyone, beyond maybe their ticket rep.
HOCKEENIGHT.COM...home of FRIDAY NIGHT FIGHTS and the HOCKEENIGHT PUCKCAST!!!
This is why the NY Times is the NY Times, I guess
In the ongoing “battle” between new and traditional media, the one thing I believe traditional media outlets have going for them is their credibility. They have the training (hopefully) and the access to various sources that would help them confirm news. Unfortunately, and I hate to sound like a 90-year-old here, we live in a time when everything is a race to be the first to “break” news, even if the news happens to be purely someone’s speculation.
Then there’s sensationalism. I think LeBrun did a fine job (in paper, if not on air, but who’s to say the show’s editors didn’t just cut his disclaimer out?) of clarifying the source of his theory, but Kovalchuk to Chicago is just so tantalizing a possibility that people got a little carried away.
by chiblackhawks on Jan 5, 2010 10:15 AM CST up reply actions
Huh
So about eight hours after this was posted, Tim Sassone posts in the Daily Herald:
That’s not even an official rumor, folks. It’s simply an executive telling a writer he wouldn’t be surprised if the Hawks inquired about Kovalchuk.
Is Sassone getting material from SCH now?
and over on ESPNChicago...
Jesse Rodgers gets around to writing the same story today
"I fornicate and play hockey, cause ther're the 2 most fun things in cold weather"
this should be a required reading on all SB Nation IMHO
baseball is a game of outs......pop out, ground out, line out, pitch out, strike out, fly out, and Fox and Bud's favorite black out

by 






















