Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin Continues Rampage, New York Wins On Road

What. Ever.: Hawks 4 - Jackets 4 (Hawks Win Figure Skating Competition 2-1)



Last game before the break.  Second of a back to back, coming less than 24 hours after the first.  Missing Hossa, Madden, Eager, and Sopel.  So I'm not really going to complain about how the Hawks got their two points.  With all our bleating and worrying, the Hawks managed to go 4-1-1 this month, and that's without playing decent hockey for more than a couple periods here and there.  Remember last March?  When the Hawks couldn't seem to tie their skates?  Well, if this is this year's March, things look up indeed.  Sure, there are problems to be solved, but we'll get to that in a bit.

The Hawks started real well, and it really was against the laws of nature that they found themselves down 2.  They piled up 19 shots, and were all over the Jacket from pillar to post.  But then one bad bounce off a ref, and Antoine Vermette was able to find Kristian Huselius with an open net to shoot at.  It got worse when a Hawks defenders Hammer and Campbell lost track of Raffi Torres, who got off two backhanders, netting the second one from a sharp angle.  You'd like to see Niemi soak up the first, but from that close I wonder how easy that would be.  Won't chalk it up as a bad goal, but not a good one either, if there is such a thing.

But Crazy 88 scored a huge one with six second left in the 1st, on the power play no less!  Topeka!  From there, the Hawks continued to roll Columbus in the 2nd.  Three straight goals from Bickell, Dowell, and Sharp-Shooter gave the Hawks what looked like a commanding lead.  A word on Bickell here:  Though it is hardly a pressing issue, I look forward to him having a full-time job on the 4th line next season.  Perhaps Dowell too.

But a poor penalty by Duncan Keith on a Hawks power-play led to one for the Jackets, which Rick Nash converted on a rebound either off of Umberger in front or Niemi.  Once that went in, I think we all knew the 3rd would be rough .

And it was.  The Hawks looked pretty much out of gas, and they probably are.  We all blacked out when Anton Stralman floored Kaner and he didn't get up.  Though it was with a knee, his leg wasn't sticking out and Kane just happened to turn at the wrong angle.  Before Sassone and Rozner and whoever else writes this column tomorrow, Troy Brouwer proceeded to beat the ever loving shit out of Stralman, so I don't want to hear anything about a goon needed.  No one could have done more.  Thankfully, Kaner got up and skated off, and I don't think he missed even a shift.  Sadly, the Hawks couldn't kill of a penalty they desperately wanted to, as Fido was able to get one in off Johnsson's stick.

The Hawks had their chances, including a power play that spilled from the 3rd into OT after Raffi Torres went a little goofy.  Sadly, no end there.  But eventually we got one, when Kane finally scored in a shootout and Troy Brouwer came back from his extended break to bury one.  SPRING BREAK!!!

OBSERVATIONS AND INANE COMMENT
-It is my sincere hope that Coach Q is trying to rouse a "Fuck You" mode out of Cristobal Huet after the break.  Starting Niemi today confused us all, as he hasn't been that impressive in his last two starts.  if this indeed was his audition as "The Man", he certainly didn't fail it, but I don't think anyone's breaking out the gold stars either.  Niemi has proved that he'll make enough good saves to keep you in it to win it, and he'll let in a bad goal here and there.  Basically, he's proved that he's Cristobal Huet.  And don't give me any nonsense about the shootout, because it doesn't matter.  We'll probably see a strict rotation in March until one of them grabs it by the horns. 

-Because he had adjusted and toned down his game to center for Marian Hossa, I had forgotten how electrifying Patrick Sharp can be.  Won't make that mistake again.

-If Steve Yzerman were picking the Canadian squad today, would Keith and Seabrook be on it?  Would they be even close?

-Colin Fraser gets little love from us, and it's a shame, because he does exactly what he's asked.  Today it meant filling in on the 3rd line center, and while I don't think he'll ever make a full time living there anywhere, he didn't let anyone down.  Shame he'll probably be scratched when Burish returns.

-I never know what to make of Rick Nash.  I've been hard on him in The Indian, but there's no question he's a generational talent.  But i still wonder what numbers he would put up if he had Iginla's meanstreak.  He's hard to defend because of his size, but does he really play to his size all the time?  Granted, he's never had a center who could make the most out of him.  And maybe I still can't get past T.J. Oshie knocking him on his ass twice in a week, or him calling for the refs to save him from Jim Vandermeer a few years ago.  Either way, I see a guy who can score 40 goals with his skills and size, but i think if he played like he knew how big he was, he could be cracking 60.  I'd still take him on my team, though.

-The Hawks now have an 11-point lead over Vancouver for the 2-seed and a 16 point division lead.  So consider those discussions over.

Player of The Game
Twice in a row
Display_image_medium
The Sharp Shooter

A brief word on our Olympic programming.  We'll do threads and previews for all US games during the Olympics, which should delight Hawks61 to no end.  When we get the quarters we'll probably do one for every game there too.  Also, we're going to do our best to get out the first ever Second City Hockey Podcast the second week of the tournament, so keep an eye out for that.

Anyway, on this Valentine's Day, seeing as how I don't really have anyone real to send one too, a big imaginary and digital box of chocolates and roses to all of you, who make doing this blog so much fun and rewarding.  Enjoy your day off tomorrow if you have one, I know I will. 

Comment 350 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I believe he was being given less time on purpose…sorry I don’t have exact quote

a little chippy: a blog, mostly hockey
SCH's Resident Goalie Fixation Specialist

by KofC on Feb 14, 2010 8:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Trade Bait?

It's THE GOAALLLIEEE!!!!!

by hauthisis on Feb 14, 2010 8:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Doghouse
Coach Q: Riding hot hand with Niemi… Wasn’t happy with Versteeg’s play, why such limited ice time.

From @NHLBlackhawks.

Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.

by chiblackhawks on Feb 14, 2010 8:37 PM CST up reply actions  

did he also

make Steeger write “I will dump the puck in” 200 times on the chalkboard?

I will dump the puck in.
I will dump the puck in.
I will dump the puck in.
I will dump the puck in.

by VerStig on Feb 14, 2010 8:39 PM CST up reply actions  

i don't know if that would stick

maybe if we got Fergie to write him a song he’d get the point

by blackhawkeyes on Feb 14, 2010 8:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow

I never noticed it before… Versteeg =Bart Simpson

Don’t have a cow, Q!

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 14, 2010 10:11 PM CST up reply actions  

Can Versteeg write?

He might have to get one of the limo girls to do it

Then all the “in” renderings will have a little heart or star to dot the “i”

by krome on Feb 15, 2010 10:32 AM CST up reply actions  

Doghouse

I assumed that earlier too. I think it’s funny when people ask “What happened to Versteeg??”
Hellooo? Haven’t we seen this movie before??

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 14, 2010 9:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Can we all agree?

Niemi or Huet doesn’t really matter when our defense is playing like butthole?

by alpo on Feb 14, 2010 8:12 PM CST reply actions  

I agree that Niemi or Huet doesn't really matter...

…because they’ve both been inconsistent and mediocre.

Once again, the D gets the woodshed, but once again, our offense and defense were better than the opposition, but goaltending wasn’t.

Cheap shot on Dunc, Sam (Seebs was always a bit of an Olympic stretch.) He’s made a month’s worth of mistakes in the past week, but again today, he made a GREAT play (as did Toews and Kane) on the first, key goal.

The guy’s put up 30+ minutes the last two nights and, along with Mike Green, he’s a clear Norris front runner. Almost a point a game still, +23, PK/PP anchor- this only happens due to night-in, night-out excellence.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 14, 2010 9:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe 30+ minutes is the problem. Is he getting worn down? Hopefully it’s just a funk.

The past is for cowards and fools....

by mdiddy on Feb 14, 2010 10:10 PM CST up reply actions  

KEITH

Will there come a time when Dunc will ever level a guy in front of the net? Or is he like Campbell, and just doesn’t rough up anyone? Love #2 and agree that maybe his sloppiness as of late is from being overworked? but would love to see him level someone.

by hawkhead on Feb 15, 2010 12:18 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't think that's really his game

I mean, not any more than Kane leveling a guy anywhere. More like Biscuit or Hammer… maybe Sopel if we’re lucky.

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 12:41 AM CST up reply actions  

Huet or Niemi Don't Matter???

OK, let me do some in depth research on that topic and I’ll see if I can get back to you. Tick, tock, tick, tock. Ok I’m done. Whew that was a tough data mining operation, but I think I might have found a pattern. Let’s take the games this past 2 weeks or so and do a little drill down.

Feb 3 Goalie HUET Result 2-3 LOSS
Feb 5 Goalie HUET Result 1-2 LOSS SHOOTOUT

Feb 6 Goalie NIEMI Result 2-1 WIN
Feb 9 Goalie NIEMI Result 4-3 WIN SHOOTOUIT
Feb 13 Goalie NIEMI Result 5-4 WIN SHOOTOUT
Feb 14 Goalie NIEMI Result 5-4 WIN SHOOTOUT

So let me get my Quad Processor computer to chunk some of the hard to find metrics here……hope this spits out some results in a day or 2. Oh WAIT! It seems to have finished early….

OK let’s see…that means the last 6 games where the D has played like crap, we have Hawks winning 4 and getting 8 out of 8 points when NIEMI was in goal and losing 2 and getting 1 out of 4 points with HUET in the nets.

Oh but wait. After reading today’s article I now know that SHOOTOUTS don’t count. So let me adjust my data here.

Hmmmm Hawks win 1 with Niemi and lose 1 with Huet. But hey, that’s only 2 data points and probably not statistically relevant.

Yeah, so after all is said and done and meaningless shootouts are eliminated I have to agree….there is absolutely no known statistical difference between having Niemi or Huet in net for the Hawks.

I am SO glad Coach Q doesn’t buy his rose colored glasses at the same store Huet’s legions do.

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 12:36 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

Um
But hey, that’s only 2 data points and probably not statistically relevant.

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 12:39 AM CST up reply actions  

someone took a hit off the sass bong

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 12:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah No Doubt

When I see “Shootouts don’t matter” and “Huet or Niemi don’t matter” and you don’t even look at THE most important stat you can ever have (# of wins in case you’re guessing)…yeah that does call for a little razzing I’d say.

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 12:53 AM CST up reply actions  

i suppose you would say that

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 12:58 AM CST up reply actions  

The Hawks should dress one player.............

for games after the break, Niemi. Because Huet is useless and all the rest are irrelevant. All we need is Antti, he’ll hold ’em off all by himself!

non se•qui•tur (nŏn sěk'wĭ-tər, -tŏŏr')
n. 1. An inference or conclusion that does not follow from the premises or
evidence.
2. A statement that does not follow logically from what preceded it.

by nextgame on Feb 15, 2010 7:49 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm still new here

so maybe you have a special breed of logic that I haven’t learned about yet. But if wins are so important, don’t Huet’s 24 count? Or are you channeling your inner Nostradamus and assuming Niemi would have won all of those too?

As for the all-important shoot out, didn’t Huet win an 11 round one and the 8 or 9 round one earlier in the year? Or wait, those don’t count, right? He was playing a bad team….like the CBJ?

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 1:15 PM CST up reply actions  

Good logical points Katherine215, but

haven’t you learned yet that logic is overrated?!

For all those arriving late for the game, please wait for the whistle (which will occur in 2 weeks), before returning to your (Niemi/Huet debating) seats.

Sincerely,
Andy Frain

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

I was late to the party

and posted before I saw McClure’s comment.

I try to stay out of this argument. I make one comment…

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 1:29 PM CST up reply actions  

I hope you know

that I posted that with a friendly grin on my face

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 1:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Of course!

I just found it ironic that I stick my toe in this argument only to find it already finished. that is my luck today!

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 1:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Last 7 games....

Huet 0-3, Niemi 4-0 shove THAT up your double thick rose colored glASSes.

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 9:53 AM CST up reply actions  

So based on your fgures

Huet 2.0 GAA in 2 games < Niemi 3.0 GAA in 4 games.
By that rational, if the Hawks win their next game with Niemi in goal 7-6, then we’ve definitely found our man.

Thank you for the enlightenment. I bet you really would’ve loved the dark ages!

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 10:03 AM CST up reply actions  

Resistance is futile

They will be ASSimilated

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 10:05 AM CST up reply actions  

In playoff terms...

…it translates into (W-L-T) 0-1-1 for huey and 1-0-3 for Niemi. This is the only relevant yardstick.

Yhe Hakws scored 13 for Niemi in the last four, 3 for Huey in the prior two.

Use your eyes man. Both goalies have been pretty meh, and the team is still great.

chiblackhawks: “The defense still stinks.” Jesus, we get spoiled fast. The D has faltered a bit lately, but I’d bet there’s a long line of goalies that would love the Hawks D inf front of them. Huey and Niemi have given up 16 goals in the last six games (2.67 GAA), and it ain’t like they’ve been standing on their head.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 10:09 AM CST up reply actions  

Jesus, we get spoiled fast.

I was gonna say “the defense falters in the face of average goaltending at some points in the game, which would lead some to believe they’ve underperformed relative to the rest of the season’s growing expectations” but I decided to go for the briefer, more succinct statement to drive a point.

The D has been less than stellar, the goaltending is average, the offense is on a roll. And we’re still winning.

Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.

by chiblackhawks on Feb 15, 2010 10:16 AM CST up reply actions  

1.66 vs 3.25

The first number is the average goals-for when Huet played those 3 games. The second number is the average goals-for when Niemi played the last 4.

Look. We’re winning and I’m relieved that we are. This is not about that. This is about the fact that when we were winning with Huet in similar fashion, you guys were on him about his bad save percentages. Now all you’re focusing on is the wins column, which was essentially what’s been pointed out all along.

What we’re saying is Niemi or Huet does not make a difference if both offense and defense stink. Maybe Niemi improves over time but in the last four games he’s shown us how average he can be— not good, not bad. This has nothing to do with glasses of any sort, and if you could pause for a minute and think—REALLY think—you’d see that.

Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.

by chiblackhawks on Feb 15, 2010 10:12 AM CST up reply actions  

Well put

Actually it’s 1.50, not 1.66, in support of Huey.

First, Huey haters and defenders roll out their familiar arguments.

Then Niemi starts a few games, and everyone puts down their arguments and picks up the other guys’.

My eye test says they both look meh lately, and they’ve both shown signs of putting together very good stretches, but other than more scoring support for Niemi, not much to choose from.

And the eye test is supported by their remarkably converging GAA and SV% stats.

It’s a lot like going into last year’s playoffs, except the rest of the team is better.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 10:34 AM CST up reply actions  

but other than more scoring support for Niemi, not much to choose from.

This includes any other available goalies around the league.

It’s just tiring having to point the same thing out (that the team is fine and can win despite average goaltending) over and over again because if Huet’s winning in goal the Hawks are covering up for him, if Huet’s losing it’s because he can’t carry them, but if Niemi’s winning it’s because he’s standing on his head and if he’s losing it’s because the defense is letting up. The double standard sucks.

Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.

by chiblackhawks on Feb 15, 2010 10:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Numbers lie

This debate reminds me of the Grossman- Orton debate.

Grossman was really, REALLY good when he was on, and really, REALLY bad when he was off. (Huet). Orton, was pretty much Orton. He played ok, every now and then showed some flashes, but for the most part was just average (Niemi).

Two different QB’s, one was lights out or light’s off, one was consistently mediocre, and after 2 full years at the helm, guess what? Their numbers were virtually IDENTICAL. (do your own research)

Here’s where it gets scary potentially, if indeed the powers at be have grown tired of Huet or lost trust in him getting it done, and are testing whether or not Niemi is who they think he is or if a new savior in the pipes is needed…

So, we pin our hopes on the mediocre guy and lo and behold a great young probowl caliber QB becomes available, we trade the farm, he comes in and sucks as much ass as the guy who was either lights out or lights off.

I don’t know what all of this means, but I think it’s pretty serious.

by Skags on Feb 15, 2010 11:00 AM CST up reply actions  

Not Sure I'd call Niemi the Orton

Given 4 shutouts in only 22 games and stopping 10 shoot outs in a row I’d say that he could be the really good one when he’s on. You also have to remember Niemi is basically a rookie. I think we’ve already seen Huet’s long term “A” game. Not so sure that’s true for Niemi.

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 11:14 AM CST up reply actions  

With 4 starts in a row

and the previous back to back I think we are starting to see what he’s made of. I can’t say I’m too impressed but I have not been too impressed with the team’s total effort either. The bottom line is our goalies will only be as successful as the team in front of them.

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 11:20 AM CST up reply actions  

Actually

This one got me thinking, and my perception — someone can look at film & call me a liar and I wouldn’t flinch — is that Niemi is the better goalie when he has a clear view of the shooter, but Huet is better when there’s a bit of chaos in front. Now, you can say that every goalie looks good when he can see the puck – and that’s true to a point – but using shootouts as an example shows that it’s not always the case. Perhaps what if boils down to is instincts versus reaction time, where Huet has the better instincts (understandable from a more experienced player) but Niemi has the quicker reflexes.

This translates to Niemi giving you a slight edge when the D is keeping opponents out of the goalie’s kitchen. I also think this suggests that in time, Niemi will be a better overall goalie than Huet. If we accept the premise that Huet, right now, has the better potential to stand on his head at times, then he’s the guy you want between the pipes when the playoffs start. Anyone who’s watched hockey over the years knows that a hot goalie CAN carry his team to the cup (while admitting that this team might be able to do it with average goaltending).

After it’s all said and done, however, both give up more rebounds than they should, which is the major flaw for each, IMHO. As I’ve said before, Huet’s getting better and giving them up off to the side. And if the other 5 guys are doing their jobs, they’ll get those bouncers cleared before the opponents can claim them. If we’re not doing that, the offense is gonna have to carry this team, which I think we all knew was going to be the case from the start. As good as the D is, it’s an offensive-minded defense, for the most part. That’s OK, too, as long as we can accept that while opportunities for the opponents may be fewer, but there will be some golden opportunities among that small number.

teaching respect for the Indian, one Red Wings fan at a time.

by 334Rules on Feb 15, 2010 11:37 AM CST up reply actions  

Well said

I think everything you’ve pointed out is definitely an observable, and while people may argue about the details I think it’s really insightful.

I absolutely agree that Niemi is the more athletic of the two, but there are definitely areas of the game where he needs significant polish. For now I’d say Huet has better rebound control and fundamentals, but when he loses focus or moves too slow it can really hurt him.

I don’t know that a Grossman/Orton comparison is valid because they’re both somewhat inconsistent with a chance of standing on their head — both more like Rexy in a way. But I don’t think either of them have been bad nearly as much (or maybe it’s their D bailing them out, though that hasn’t happened much recently).

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 11:44 AM CST up reply actions  

Double Standard Sucks

Hey, we agree!!!! I went into the blog today thinking I ain’t gonna start the Huet/Niemi stuff into the Olympics, but looking forward to a few props for him winning a couple of games in the shoot outs by stopping 10 in a row and what? 11 out of 12? Instead what set me off today was the inane article comment " And don’t give me any nonsense about the shootout, because it doesn’t matter."!!! WTF???? Shoot outs don’t matter to WHO exactly with ANY semblance of hockey sense? IMO that comment was THE definition of double standard….make every excuse for Huet when he loses (well, he doesn’t see many shots so he lets bad ones in because he’s not tested enough)…but when Niemi completely shuts down teams in the OT and shootout, just say “It doesn’t matter”. THAT is BS.

What I saw w/o getting into save % etc.

1) When the D plays good both goalies can win.
2) When the D plays bad and the O plays bad, both goalies can lose.
3) When the D plays bad and the O plays good, I’ll take Niemi, SO FAR, ESPECIALLY if we go to the shoot outs as a result.

Bottom lines:

Keep both goalies and don’t make an Orton or Grossman type trade right now….no need for that and no one is available who’s a star #1 for sure.

Play the hot hand vs. anointing a #1 since neither have distinguished themselves as a #1 for sure.

Light up some Marlboro 72 ass after the Olympics if they keep playing like they did the last 2+ weeks because if THAT is what we’re gonna get from our top D in the playoffs we’re screwed. I HOPE the last few weeks have just been the “Look MA, I made the Olympics” temporary crap.

Watch to see if Niemi keeps developing and CAN become THE guy for a long time to come.

Enjoy the best hockey team we’ve seen in Chicago in a LONG time.

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 11:38 AM CST up reply actions   1 recs

See your first sentence points out exactly where you went wrong

“I went… …thinking”.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 11:41 AM CST up reply actions  

OK it was your second sentence

and then blah blah blah….

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 11:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Where is the little hustler now?

Way to actually back up what you have been saying rather than just saying…. Huet sucks! Niemi Rules and should be number one! Why is that? Because Niemi is not Huet thats why…. just plain stupid! I pretty much ignore this because at the end of the day they are pretty much the same damn goaltender!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 15, 2010 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Reading the Chicago Tribune

“Quenneville said he started Niemi for a fourth consecutive game because he’s the hot goaltender and deserved to play”. Hmmmmmm. What’s the counter argument to that one?

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 11:08 AM CST up reply actions  

ok...

any player can get hot at any time… I honestly wouldn’t even consider what Niemi has done in the net these last two games hot… If in four games he has a shutout or 2 and has a GAA lower than 2.00 than I would consider that as being hot! Average Goaltending + Stellar Offense = 42-15-5! Don’t for a second believe that the offense hasn’t burried out the goaltending in more than 75% of these games! With say the offensive talent of Oilers (148 goals 29th in the league) with these goalies in net we become as bad record wise as they are! Lets just all stop and take a deep breath here and look at the only numbers that matter 42-15-5!!! We haven’t seen a hawks team this good in over a decade! This is my last post about goalies for the rest of the year cause I am SICK of this argument! Unless you think you could do a better job as a starting NHL goaltender! THEN STFU, GRAB A BEER, AND ENJOY THE BEST DAMN SEASON THE HAWKS HAVE HAD IN A LOOOOOONNNNGGGGG FUCKING TIME!!!! Thank you and good day!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 15, 2010 11:26 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah OK

Agree or disagree, if you’re too dumb to argue on topic or too lazy to back up your position with a semblance of thought, you can always revert to insulting the other guy. Gee, that’s REALLY hard to do. This post and some of the ones above basically have shown me how intelligent you are. I’ll take my lumps discussing and disagreeing with people on here who at least try to include some logic with their insults. You I am ignoring from now on and I’ll go farther and say with your recent comments you don’t belong on this blog.

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 11:54 AM CST up reply actions  

Sob sob
Gee, that’s REALLY hard to do.

No, actually it was pretty easy, and you did most of the work for me. Thanks!

When you fill up the thread with your drivel, support it with facts that are actually contrary to your argument, and then turn around and say “I ain’t gonna start the Huet/Niemi stuff” and then do exactly that…

What. Ever. Please, please ignore me.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 12:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice job

referencing the title of the blog post we’re commenting on in your dismissal of husler777.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 2:27 PM CST up reply actions  

I've even actually 'read' a few articles in Playboy

Citing our discussion of Bill Hicks the other day and the board talk about the waffle house in St. Louis, I thought you might enjoy this.

I have a better version of it on disc, but this one’s a good primer if you’ve never seen him.

Welllll, looks like we’ve got ourselves a “reader”.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 2:40 PM CST up reply actions  

I ate in a WH

over Christmas. First time, probably not my last, but goddamn what a unique slice of America.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 6:43 PM CST up reply actions  

Where have you been?

It’s the same argument hurled against Huey: SV% .896 over last four games. Over the past three, it’s .863. These games should not have gone to overtime.

I give Anti props for the STL game- one of the precious few games all year the Hawks can count as (in Q’s words): “a goalie win.” That game alone probably earned him the next three starts, and, IMO, he sorta wet the bed here against so-so competition.

Shootout points are great- I’ll take ’em, but they have virtually no bearing on the key decision of who plays how much in the post-season.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 11:36 AM CST up reply actions  

Minor Data -

First off, I don’t care who starts as long as we win

Last 4 Starts for each

Neimi – 3 Home & 1 road game – GAA = 3.00 / GFA 4.00. Opponents – 3 of 4 teams would not make the playoffs if they started today and the 4th (Dallas) is barely hanging on.

Huet – 2 home & 2 road games – GAA = 3.00 / GFA 2.00. Opponents – 2 of 4 teams, (San Jose & Phoenix) are in the top 4 of their division

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 10:18 AM CST up reply actions  

thanks for enlightening me!

Either way if our defence plays as good as they can play! It doesn’t fucking matter who is in net! Honestly I felt like the defense actually gave a damn against San Jose! That was one of the first games in a long time that they have played to their potential for more than 1 period of a game!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 15, 2010 10:50 AM CST up reply actions  

you add nothing of value to the conversation.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 12:30 PM CST up reply actions  

7 game sample size

works for me. Now get the fuck out of here if you can’t play nice, dumbASS.

2009 SCH Post Whore
2010 Troll Collector
SCH's Resident Mom

by Trixietrx on Feb 15, 2010 1:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Thanks for at least putting a heading

so I can close this drivel

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 9:57 AM CST up reply actions  

I never realized that women's hockey was so similar to pond hockey

the fat kid still gets thrown in net.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 14, 2010 8:14 PM CST reply actions  

there, a box of candy!

Yeah, I know it’s football, STFU. How likely am I to find anything hockey-related in a dollar store? (Well, aside from hockey cards, which is what I went in to look for.) Just pretend it’s puck-shaped candy…and the phrase on it works for hockey, right?

Enjoy a bit of time off/working on the podcast!

a little chippy: a blog, mostly hockey
SCH's Resident Goalie Fixation Specialist

by KofC on Feb 14, 2010 8:14 PM CST reply actions  

Here, have some Puck shaped Fudge

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 14, 2010 10:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe

Huet would stop more pucks if they looked like this!

CHEEESSEEEE PUCK!!!!!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 14, 2010 10:09 PM CST up reply actions  

this isn’t curling

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 12:04 AM CST up reply actions  

is this disturbing to other people too?

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 12:46 AM CST up reply actions  

Sam

Don’t get all mushy on us.

by gmh on Feb 14, 2010 8:15 PM CST reply actions  

you should have said that before I posted!

a little chippy: a blog, mostly hockey
SCH's Resident Goalie Fixation Specialist

by KofC on Feb 14, 2010 8:16 PM CST up reply actions  

HMMM

If I never saw a shootout again I wouldn’t mind. I have my fair share of them these past few days.

It's THE GOAALLLIEEE!!!!!

by hauthisis on Feb 14, 2010 8:15 PM CST reply actions  

Pictures
This was the only picture they had on offer. Apparently, all AP photographers had a hot date.

Meeshak, you’re an AP photographer?

by Katherine215 on Feb 14, 2010 8:26 PM CST reply actions  

i was wondering if someone would bring this up

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 12:05 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm glad you did

I was waiting for it.

2009 SCH Post Whore
2010 Troll Collector
SCH's Resident Mom

by Trixietrx on Feb 15, 2010 9:12 AM CST up reply actions  

CANADA WON A GOLD MEDAL?!

Hawks61 must be running nude through the streets in celebration.

Chicagoan in the Lou.

by Mike Martin on Feb 14, 2010 8:37 PM CST reply actions  

Yeah

Nothing they show is live, and it’s kinda sad.

Chicagoan in the Lou.

by Mike Martin on Feb 14, 2010 8:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Great Story behind it too

I know, I know there is a story behind every athlete in the Olympics, but watching his joy and then his brother’s brought a tear to my eye. Especially after he said that it was for his brother.

Congrats to Canada on their 1st oh home turf Gold

September 26, 2007 The day a Franchise was reborn.

by Roos-34 on Feb 15, 2010 8:06 AM CST up reply actions  

Wait? What?......how did you know?

Laying all jokes aside it was quite the party in the Nation’s Capital at the Cabin. It’s more of a sigh of relief than anything but it was great that we didn’t lose it in the end like what happened the night before.

With that said though, I now know more about Alexandre Bilodeau than I’ve ever wanted to but that’s too be expected when after 33 years of failure you become the first to break the curse. It’s a tremendous story and a tremendous night (from what I still remember). It was quite the celebration.

Let the Olympic spirit live in everyone.
GO CANADA GO!
Congratulations to Alexandre Bilodeau on being the first Canadian to win on home soil.

by hawks61 on Feb 15, 2010 11:58 AM CST up reply actions  

And it was in a cool sport

that medal ceremony will be intense, I hope they show it on American tv. I think an American got a medal there too so they probably will.

by Scott13 on Feb 15, 2010 12:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Canada's off the schniede!

Now the analysts will shut up about it.

Seriously though, I cheered really loud when that last skier came in 6th. It kept the US guy in the bronze heated chair, which by the way, I thought was extremely cool. In a hot sort of way.

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

I felt sorry for that guy

IMO the judges were so fearful for their lives that they completely screwed him on his score.

The bigger screw almost occurred when the Australian/Canadian guy took over the top spot. Now that would’ve been salt in the wound!

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 1:24 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought for sure the American was out

and the French guy was 2nd. I wondered if the Australian/Canadian guy enjoyed the anthem during the medal ceremony. Have they shown it yet?

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 1:31 PM CST up reply actions  

I didn't see it, but I'm sure ALL OF CANADA DID!

It would be humorously ironic though to see him signing along to “Oh, Canada”!

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 1:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Because it's a night sport

the medal ceremonies have been happening the day after. I’m guessing they’ll show it at some point in prme time tonight.

by Scott13 on Feb 15, 2010 5:49 PM CST up reply actions  

it’s at 10 tonight eastern time. you better believe i’ll be watching, too.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 6:24 PM CST up reply actions  

FML

I have to be at work tmo at 7am, as usual. Everyone else enjoy sleeping in, you bastards.

"FACEOFF!" "Makes the pass." "FIGHT!" - 8 bit hockey

by chevrier30 on Feb 14, 2010 9:09 PM CST reply actions  

I know they are pretty much the same BUT

I can’t get over how Huet goes to the ground as soon as a stick is raised within 50 feet, I hate that he can’t go post to post when he’s already sprawling (see AN’s stop on Nash in the shootout) and AN has never been caught 10 or so feet out of the crease trying to close the angle on someone who is setting him up. With that said I am find with these guys, but I think the start might have been a test to see what AN can do while tired and maybe more. Hawks got in at 3 am. Why the hell start a goalie after playing 3 periods, an OT, and a shootout?

Light a fire under Huet? Maybe but I won’t be shocked if something bigger happens.

by Duck99 on Feb 14, 2010 9:09 PM CST via mobile reply actions  

They aren't the same

They both have their strengths and weaknesses… not to attack or defend either but Niemi has his issues too — I’ve always thought his rebound control was noticeably less solid than Huet’s.

by VerStig on Feb 14, 2010 9:15 PM CST up reply actions  

All conversations regarding Huet/Niemi have been BOYCOTTED for the next 2 weeks.

I am citing the collective mental heath of our hive mind.

Your assimilation is appreciated.
Resistance is futile.

Yours truly,
The Borg

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 14, 2010 9:40 PM CST up reply actions   1 recs

oops

I guess that didn’t happen… oh well, Chicago sports fans will be Chicago sports fans.

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Well as we obviously already know

some people come in, ignore what everyone else has already written, put there head down and go to it at their keyboard like they’re fucking Schroeder on the piano. “Hey, I’ve got something new to say! Hear me!”

I even added a graphic so that it might catch the attention of the avid Hustler “reader”. Maybe because it wasn’t green, it wasn’t obvious enough. Maybe I can add blinking lights…

Sigh

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 12:11 PM CST up reply actions  

I love your description of these Antti nutjobs.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 2:31 PM CST up reply actions  

I agree

Q’s giving Niemi every chance to win the job and/or light a fire under Huet.

Let’s face it — there’s not much out there goalie-wise. Gigiure was probably a decent fit, salary cap wise but Bowman passed.

Tim Thomas? He makes more than Huet and is on the downhill slide. You could make a case that he’d thrive under a better back line…..but why deal for him? Is Cam Ward available?

I think the Blackhawks are going to stick with what they have. On HNIC, Pierre Le Brun said “…..The Hawks are doing their due diligence on goalies. But, they may stand pat….”

Gee, how incisive. The Hawks may make a trade, they may not.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Feb 15, 2010 7:31 PM CST up reply actions  

Fraser

I guess what I would say of Fraser is that he tries. Really, really hard.

by Brian C on Feb 14, 2010 9:25 PM CST reply actions  

did anyone

go to that cooking with fraz thing they had not long ago???

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 14, 2010 10:04 PM CST up reply actions  

I think Fraser has been playing his ass off...

…almost 15 minutes last night, 13 the night before (vs. 9 and 5 for Kopecky.)

Key #1 PK time with Brouwer too.

If Eager’s not healthy, Fraser may make the playoff line-up yet.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 10:16 AM CST up reply actions  

I was disappointed

when all our centers went down earlier this year that he didn’t get a tryout for important minutes. I assume it had a lot to do with the +/- of the 4th line early in the year, but given his PK time I assumed the coaches were comfortable with his defensive play and he keeps his offensive game simple. Maybe they tried in practice and didn’t like what they saw.

by Scott13 on Feb 15, 2010 12:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Bouwer

Everyday in every way I love him more and more!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 14, 2010 10:04 PM CST reply actions  

Damnit!

that’s a spelling fail right there! I meant Brouwer… but I’m sure everyone knew who I was talking about!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 14, 2010 10:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Bower Power

SCH Resident Idiot
The only Cup we can win is this years

by Johnny Lava on Feb 14, 2010 10:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Barcelona reference?

Maybe I misremembered the ad. The point is I could’ve shaved the wrong way all my life and never have known it. Then I could have taught my son to shave the wrong way, too.
You have a son?
No.
But I might someday. Then, maybe I’ll teach him to shave the wrong way.
I think maybe my English is not so good.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 14, 2010 10:17 PM CST up reply actions  

This is a good time for a break

no Who’s in Goal or Who’s on What Line games for a couple of weeks.

Enjoy the vacation everyone!

SCH Resident Idiot
The only Cup we can win is this years

by Johnny Lava on Feb 14, 2010 10:08 PM CST reply actions  

and GO USA!!!

SCH Resident Idiot
The only Cup we can win is this years

by Johnny Lava on Feb 14, 2010 10:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Madden heading to Mississippi. Will stay at Favre compound.

The past is for cowards and fools....

by mdiddy on Feb 14, 2010 10:23 PM CST up reply actions  

is Madden

going to limo rehab??? Or is his wife making him take a limo edict class. Rule #1: Leave your shirt on. Rule #2: If your going to commit an infidelity at least make sure she is of greater or equal attractiveness to your significant other. and Rule #3 the most important one: NO FUCKING CAMERAS!!!!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 14, 2010 10:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I believe he’s attending the annual Hattiesburg Chest Waxing Convention.

The past is for cowards and fools....

by mdiddy on Feb 14, 2010 11:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Is rule #2 really a good idea?

At least in terms of facing the wife? I’ve not cheated before, but I would imagine a hotter woman would cause a crisis of self-worth in addition to the feelings of betrayal, etc. “What’s the matter? Am I not attractive to you anymore?” That kind of thing.

Put another way, I would think that “But you’re way hotter than she is! Just look at her!” would be a useful card to be able to play.

by Brian C on Feb 15, 2010 10:06 AM CST up reply actions  

To begin with,

it’s probably best to keep it in your pants. If you’re going to cheat, it may as well be with someone hotter. I think no matter what you say, your wife will still think that you find the other woman to be more physically attractive. Let’s put the shoe on the other foot, besides the act of infidelity, what would be worse for your self esteem, if she was with Brad Pitt or Carrot Top?

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 11:01 AM CST up reply actions  

LMAO!

Said perfectly!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 15, 2010 11:29 AM CST up reply actions  

The idea of cheating up

is to make it worth it. There’s no way Madden thinks it was worth it. They’re probably not even allowed to watch the Vancouver Olympics in his house because “that’s where the whores live” now. Poor guy.

by Scott13 on Feb 15, 2010 12:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Its like Misery?

is that why he is injured? Is his wife holding him hostage and breaking his legs?

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 15, 2010 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Has anyone else pictured a chinese news animation...

… of Mrs. Madden chasing his car down the driveway with a hockey stick?

Or is that just me?

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 14, 2010 10:20 PM CST up reply actions  

I have not...

but think it would be hilarious!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 14, 2010 10:21 PM CST up reply actions  

I think it's me

Brouwer tonight, Bolland yesteray. Obviously I made a huge impression on them.

Sharpie, disappointed that I didn’t go see him, so he’s just trying to impress me.

Happy Valentines Day to all my favorite alkies!

2009 SCH Post Whore
2010 Troll Collector
SCH's Resident Mom

by Trixietrx on Feb 14, 2010 10:38 PM CST reply actions  

Can you please visit Versteeg?

So we can start calling him VERSTEEG! once more? While you’re at it, maybe Buff too. Though he has been showing some signs of life, at least.

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 12:27 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah, Buff's had his moments the last few games.

That usually means a three-goals-in-three-nights is coming up. But who knows now with the break.

by Brian C on Feb 15, 2010 10:07 AM CST up reply actions  

Tell me where they live

I can stalk with the best of them.

2009 SCH Post Whore
2010 Troll Collector
SCH's Resident Mom

by Trixietrx on Feb 15, 2010 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Niemi isn’t cutting it. Did you know he’s never played in an nhl playoff game? I say we give this huet guy a shot at taking the #1 spot.

They brought their fuckin' TOYS with 'em!

by ZootSuitZombie on Feb 14, 2010 11:42 PM CST reply actions  

Didn’t you see ChicagoNativeSon’s boycott/moratorium?

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 12:10 AM CST up reply actions  

we need to want the backup to play at all times. that’s how this works. the starter always sucks and the backup needs a chance to show what he’s got because he just may be the second coming.

They brought their fuckin' TOYS with 'em!

by ZootSuitZombie on Feb 15, 2010 3:44 PM CST up reply actions  

this won't be news to you

but that’s a great point

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 6:25 PM CST up reply actions  

Shootout Doesn't Matter???!!!

“And don’t give me any nonsense about the shootout, because it doesn’t matter.”

Is Rozner writing for SCH now? That’s a comment that is only true the last day of the season when the playoffs start. Like or hate the concept is irrelevant. It IS in the rules and if anyone hasn’t noticed it DOES affect wins and standings points no matter how much fun is made of the concept. And I AM happy we got a goalie that saved us from losing 2 games going into the Olympic break and instead has us on a 4 game winning even though he played 4 games in a row including a back to back 65 minute shootout games with little sleep and an overnight road trip. Why do I get a funny feeling that if Mr. Huet saved 10 shootout attempts in a row it might actually reflect some ability and we’d get calls asking what the Huet bashers have to say now? Cripes what a RIDICULOUS comment.

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 12:16 AM CST reply actions  

It's not *that* ridiculous

I’m not defending Rozner (he’s not exactly…defensible) but you could make the argument the outcome of the shootout shouldn’t affect your judgment of poor play. In fact, I’m pretty sure that was a SCH comment…

That said, you have every right to be happy about us winning. 2 points is 2 points. We just hope that the Hawks don’t think winning despite poor play in regulation means they can rest easy.

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 12:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Yeah it is

If you want to judge poor or good play, the shootout IS part of the game AND I’d say it’s a pretty darn good indication of some goalie abilities. The ability to win 3 games by stopping 10 out of 11 shots DOES make my opinion of Niemi higher than before. Ignoring shootouts when judging his play , maybe only to me, IS ridiculous.

As to non-shootout play…..yeah, I wish Niemi would have stopped 2 of the goals he let in the last 4 games. But taking the “Hey look ma, I made the Olympics!” defense into account, I think he played well above mediocre and was in the end able to win 4, one goal games and get 8 out of 8 points And the best we get in the article and comments is “Niemi proved he’s just like Huet, niether matter and don’t count shootouts” What crap! Give the guy some credit and look forward to him getting some experience and getting even better.

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 12:49 AM CST up reply actions  

Wish there was a bad goal stat.

I feel Niemi BGS < Huet BGS.

Just observation, nothing to back it up.

by ballyb on Feb 15, 2010 9:51 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh no, it's the incontestable "eye test" again

great metric for an analytical discussion.
Sigh

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 9:56 AM CST up reply actions  

Uh.....

Did you see the Afinogenov goal? The Slater goal? The dumb rebound on the Torres goal? Niemi is getting bailed out by our offense. I think part of the reason Niemi is so popular is that he flops around making semi-challenging saves look spectacular. Niemi a great back-up but let’s stop turning him in a Micah Hoffpauir or Bobby Scales.

by alpo on Feb 15, 2010 1:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Niemi will remain beloved...

…until he’s annointed #1. Then, the knives come out.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 1:13 PM CST up reply actions  

...or he starts to play like Huet

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Feb 15, 2010 1:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Based on the past three games...

…he’s on track to outflank Huey on the shitty side pretty soon.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 1:35 PM CST up reply actions  

......yep ....he should have one of Huet's patented melt downs

soon…although Huet is the master

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Feb 15, 2010 1:38 PM CST up reply actions  

You mean

like the one against Vancouver?

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

well...maybe..we will never know

 Q-stache was impatient that night.

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Feb 15, 2010 3:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Afinogenov goal wasn't good.

Campbell tipped Slater’s goal over Niemi’s shoulder. Torres – talk to SamFels.

I’ve never said that Niemi has played fantastically.

But, Niemi deserves his chance to be #1. Huet is a very known commodity.

by ballyb on Feb 15, 2010 2:37 PM CST up reply actions  

All the more reason

for us to hide him now and whip him out, ninja-style, in the playoffs!

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 3:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Was it just me

Or did Buff seem like he was moving quicker than usual.

wait what?

by pepe126 on Feb 15, 2010 12:27 AM CST reply actions  

two games in a row, no less!

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 12:34 AM CST up reply actions  

Maybe Barker's trade, although not a surprise,

plus, the presence of all the Rockford guys who typically come up and work their asses off, lit a fire under him?

Let’s not also not forget that in the past 2 games Buff has been playing a role that is more suited for him. He’s off the point on the PP and I noticed him in front of the net quite a bit last night.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 12:45 PM CST up reply actions  

This ice hockey game was good

but how about that Daytona 500?!

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 1:00 AM CST reply actions  

The 4 hour driveway patch fix

was stupid. When your sport’s showcase event takes a few hour break because of a Chicago winter pot hole somebody fucked up really bad. The race should have ended right around the time the Hawks game started, instead it finished during overtime and I mostly missed it. I saw at least one green/white/checker attempt that failed miserably so I just switched back to the Hawks game and missed the end.

by Scott13 on Feb 15, 2010 2:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Video of Brouwer Fight?

Given the great camera work on WGN that missed most of the fight, anyone find a clip of the whole thing somewhere?

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 1:14 AM CST reply actions  

Yeah. Guess they missed it.

Jackets announcers calling for an interference penalty on the Hawks after that wonderful open ice hit. Cripes. Makes me glad to deal with the occasional Foley/Eddie O giggly girls PJ party stuff.

by husler777 on Feb 15, 2010 1:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Jackets announcers crying about safety of Stralman

by hawkhead on Feb 15, 2010 1:19 AM CST reply actions  

Yeah that totally pissed me off

He is not a fighter…the refs should step in and do something to stop this…..gimme a fuckin break!!!!!!If the little piece o shit deuche bag isn’t a fighter he shouldn’t take a run at one of our best players,or any of our players for that matter!!!dumbass homer announcers!!!!Brouwer did his job beautifully….and i can guarantee you stralman will not go after any hawks players when these teams meet again

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 4:37 AM CST up reply actions  

well..

He didn’t exactly “take a run” at Kane… he just hit him. I think it was clean but Kane took an unfortunate angle and it resulted in it looking like it was knee-to-knee.

Also, listen to Eddie O any time Keith has been a fight – he’ll cry for someone to step in too.

by Killion on Feb 15, 2010 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

not true..

Eddie called for Burish to come over and save Keith…

by Killion on Feb 15, 2010 12:46 PM CST up reply actions  

The day that the Stanley Cup is decided by

our announcers vs their announcers, I will be concerned with this.

I personally love it when other broadcast teams whine and complain about the Hawks. It makes me feel like a pack of Virgina Slims.

“You’ve come a long way, baby”

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 12:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Now that I'm not foaming at the mouth (or fingertips)

I just reread what I wrote above and that sounds dismissive, which was not my intent. Plus, it was a better topic than the They-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named debate so I’d like to revisit this.

I didn’t hear the Columbus broadcast, so I don’t know to what extent they were “whining”. Also, I had not previously noticed Edzo crying for someone to step in during Keith fights (he’s had so few). I checked out hockeyfights and youtube but could only find one other Keith fight with Edzo on the broadcast. This one against Svitov. You are correct sir. Edzo TOTALLY whines like someone just molested his dog while Duncs is getting owned. Very embarrassing based on the standards laid out above.

On the other hand, I definitely wouldn’t consider Edzo to be whining during the fight with Burrows. He stated only once, and very matter-of-factly, that Burish needed to help Dunc. I can definitely give him a pass on that one since I’m sure he was as dumbstruck as all of us at the site of a non-WWE wrestler pulling another man’s hair. Even if he is a ginger.

Bottom line, if you’re going to put a big hit on another team’s star player, expect to pay a price. I know there have been a lot of articles in the media lately against retaliatory fighting, but IMO it is the number one reason to fight in hockey. If you can’t skate with the big dogs, stay on the porch.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 6:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Here is the Columbus broadcast of Brouwer’s fight.

http://www.hockeyfights.com/fights/92606

Keith gave up a lot more height to Svitov than Stralman did to Brouwer though, and probably more weight as well. Keith also stood in for a lot longer (at least twice as long) and took more blows since Brouwer didn’t do that good of a job.

by Spotacus on Feb 15, 2010 7:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Kane was laughing when he looked up at the big screen to see Brouwer embarrasing Stralman. “Stralman’s not a fighter”

by hawkhead on Feb 15, 2010 1:29 AM CST reply actions  

Defense

The Hawks “active stick” defensemen need to get back to basics. The failure to make a simple play and take the body instead of chase the puck has had the defense burned a lot lately, especially today. Columbus skated right past the Hawks D as they were caught swatting at air, and looking bad in the process. The question of whether the Hawks play physical enough always dovetails into the red-herring “goon” conversation instead of addressing why so many of the Hawks this season fail to take the body when it’s the correct hockey play. I don’t know if it’s a change in coaching philosophy or if the team’s mental approach has drifted but this is something the team did better last year than so far this year.

by Scott13 on Feb 15, 2010 1:50 AM CST reply actions  

Amen!

Sometimes it is just the better play to take the body, clear the puck out of the zone, or even ice the puck rather than try a cross ice pass in the defensive zone in an effort to start another offensive rush. Puck possession is one thing, but actually playing defense when you need to is another.

Whether the man in the net is Huet or Niemi, it would be fair to say that if we saw a little more of what Brent Sopel dished out in that 4 on 3 overtime power play a few games back from a few more of our defensemen, we would have far fewer Chinese fire drills for either goalie to have to manage.

I also think having another defesman who can play 15-20 minutes a game if needed will yield benefits in resting Keith and Seabs, who when tired, tend to make mental errors which lead to tough save moments for any goalie in the net.

by Return of the Roar on Feb 15, 2010 11:15 AM CST up reply actions  

Patrick Sharp has been

 On a tear since he joined Kane and Toews…hopefully Hawks management sees this and doesn’t trade him….even if he is not scoring or assisting they are keeping possession of the puck inside the opposing teams blue line for almost 90 percent of their shift…they are flat out dominating……Didn’t like the hit by Stralman,looked at it a few times,seemed like a clean hit,but he could have possible been goin after the knee,he doesn’t seem to lead with his shoulder at all….anyways good job by Brouwer for beatin the shit out of him,and that should end the “we need a tough guy to protect our stars” debate…Brouwer is tough Ladd is too and when Buff wants to be he can too…i like Bryan Bickell,he seems to give a full effort every time he gets called up to play

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 4:33 AM CST reply actions  

I wish Bickell

had a perma smile, Love the toothless grin. Kinda reminds me of that Dude on the show “Ax Men” if you watched that ever

September 26, 2007 The day a Franchise was reborn.

by Roos-34 on Feb 15, 2010 8:13 AM CST up reply actions  

LOL!

That show on the history channel?hahahaha

Never watched it but from start to finish but i caught a few minutes every here and there )

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 8:43 AM CST up reply actions  

Yep that's the one

The toothless wonder on there is good for quite a few laughs

September 26, 2007 The day a Franchise was reborn.

by Roos-34 on Feb 15, 2010 8:45 AM CST up reply actions  

Axmen is Icetruckers without teeth....

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Feb 15, 2010 11:44 AM CST up reply actions  

Just a few thoughts....

(I’m in grouchy old bastard mode today)

> The next time there’s an opposing player in behind Keith, wide open at the edge of our crease, I wish he’d plant the blade of his stick firmly up Keith’s ass, just to let him know he’s there, right before he knocks it into a gaping net for another opponents goal. Jesus Christ, a little awareness Dunc, pleeeeease!

> What the hell was with WGN cutting off the Blackhawks TV broadcast in mid-flight after the game to start showing ‘Species’? I like looking at Natasha Henstridge as much as the next guy, but it coulda waited another 15 minutes.

>A little late on this, but was I the only one that noticed the Hawks only had four men on the ice for Atlanta’s 2nd goal in Saturdays game? The Thrash had just killed off a Hawk power play, and the Hawks were changing up and wound up with only four on the ice when the goal was scored. No mention of this anywhere during or after the game, except for me and my buds sitting together up in the 300’s. Was it a group hallucination?

non se•qui•tur (nŏn sěk'wĭ-tər, -tŏŏr')
n. 1. An inference or conclusion that does not follow from the premises or
evidence.
2. A statement that does not follow logically from what preceded it.

by nextgame on Feb 15, 2010 8:16 AM CST reply actions  

What is this thing you call milk, and what is its alcohol content?

/Note unceasing sarcastic laughter in background.

by burpchelischili on Feb 15, 2010 2:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Hawks D (including backcheckers) is the team's backbone...

Here’s the top-10 teams in GAA this year:

NJ 2.36
CHI 2.39
SJ 2.47
VAN 2.49
PHX 2.51
CAL 2.52
BUF 2.53
BOS 2.57
COL 2.59

Every team on this list, except for the #2 slot, has a very good or elite netminder. (Note that the Hakws recent “defensive collapse”, GAA of 2.67 over the past six with mediocre goaltending) would still be good for #11 in the league.)

How, I wonder, have the Hawks pulled this trick off?

This is why adding Yonsun’s minutes will be so huge for the Hawks.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 11:11 AM CST reply actions  

In one way its

quite impressive….and at least to me it is a little worrisome…..11th in the league in GAA is good,not great but good,considering your team is i think 4th or 5th in GFA…..With this 2.67 GAA in the last 6 and this “SLUMP” the blackhawks are still 4-1-1 which is great….However,since the minny game where the hawks blew a big lead and lost in the shootout,the hawks have a 3.29 GAA if i am not mistakenand that is not good at all,this is worrisome,but again in that period the HAWKS are 10-5-2…its kinda funny,you can say that this team is in a slump,and yet they continue to play above .500 hockey….donno what to think,the blown leads worry me,hopefully they start to play their best hockey in march and April…

GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 11:28 AM CST up reply actions  

strike that...i was wrong

51 goals in the last 17 games….3 GAA…sorry,i read somewhere a fan wrote it was 3.29…i jsut did the math….51 gaa since the minny debacle….still worried a bit,hopefully Q will use the break wisel to fix this problem,and tear the D a new asshole like he did to Steeger last night,you dont wanna play D and make the simple play?sit your ass down!!!!!

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 12:02 PM CST up reply actions  

The Minny game is probably the touchstone...

…for when it all started to go HORRIBLY WRONG!

Adjusting for shootout and empty net goals, the Hawks have scored 2.82 / game and allowed 2.94 / game over this period. It’s a miracle they’re 10-5-2 during the stretch.

Considering our goaltending has not been great lately, I still think the D has played all right, contrary to a lot of hand-wringing here. SOG remains ridiculously low. Consider also in this equation that in Ketih and Campbell, the Hawks have two of the top offensive defensemen in the league.

I am way more confident that the D will find its form for the playoffs than that the offensive will produce consistently or that the goalies will play above average.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 12:19 PM CST up reply actions  

What has been

the HAWKS SOG average since the Minny slump?

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 12:23 PM CST up reply actions  

Shots on goal or shots against?

Starting from that Jan 9 game, shots for are averaging 34.88 while shots against are 25.17 (or 25.18 if you round it off).

Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.

by chiblackhawks on Feb 15, 2010 12:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Sorry

i meant to ask both…so SOG are 34.88 which is great,and Shots allowed is 25.18…which is basically on par with the season average if i am not mistaken right?so what is with the GAA goin up from like 2.15 to 2.30?

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 12:47 PM CST up reply actions  

the team average

is 33.8 shots and 24.4 shots against per game. Our GAA during that span is actually 3.00, while our goals-for is 2.88. Season average GAA is 2.31, and season average goals-for is 3.13.

Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.

by chiblackhawks on Feb 15, 2010 12:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Got that

the GAA was i htink like at 2.14 or 2.15 before the so called slump….i’m jsut wondering what has changed in that time that the Hawks are allowing 3 goals a game,the shots average in the last 17 is 25.18 according to you,,that is only 1 shot more than the season average….I realize that when you take a look at the schedule it was the toughest point of the season….and of those 17 games 11 were on the road,including a ridiculous 8 game road trip that took them all over norhtern canada to the east coast in Carolina,just wwondering why they have allowed more goals than usual…The D has made some mistakes,but they haven’t been that bad,at least IMO

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Pre-Minnesota stats

GAA – 2.045
GF – 3.22
SF/G – 33.43
SA/G – 24.068

I think it’s just the time of the season.

Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.

by chiblackhawks on Feb 15, 2010 1:01 PM CST up reply actions  

For sure

Last we were losing these games. Anyone remember the Vancouver smackdown? This year we’re so much better than these losses are turning into wins.

by alpo on Feb 15, 2010 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I've lost you man

the Vancouva smack down?when the Haks lost to Van in chitown?

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 1:09 PM CST up reply actions  

last year. during are nasty losing streak

after that game everyone was crying we’d be one and done

by alpo on Feb 15, 2010 1:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Yeah i remember that

You do have a point….last year they went through a nasty losing streak and everyone thought they were gonna be one and done….but even after the nasty losing streak,like the last 10 games,i recall hte hawks having their A game,and that is really what matters,hitting your stride at the end of march and beginning of April right on time for playoff hockey

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 1:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Well hopefully

it is just that time of the season…the big road trip,combined with the fact that the Hawks were do a slump….i would really like to see them get back on track,even though a 10-5-2 so called “SLUMP” isn’t awful at all,its actually ok

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 1:05 PM CST up reply actions  

I could only imagine the Meatball Rage

if we were having a New Jersey or Sabres type of streak. Right now both are 3-5-2 in their last ten. Another thing is that with the Hawks scraping these wins allows them to further create a cushion in the Central. So if they are tired, Q will be able to sit and rest a lot of our guys.

by alpo on Feb 15, 2010 1:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Dude i'm not

really thinking that were done or anything…and yes i do realize NJ and Buff are in a bit of a slump too…and Wash has lost 3 in a row now,there is a reason i put the word slump in quotation marks,i’ve just heard that people have been calling it a slump on other websites newspapers etc…

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 1:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Not questioning you. You for sure know your stuff

I found myself trying to figure the cause of this slump too. Our SOG differential is still solid. I was sorta trying to search if there is a quality SOG stat. How could we consistently be playing peppering the opposition without smoking them? There is no way every goalie we face is playing their best game of the season but it always seems like it.

by alpo on Feb 15, 2010 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

...better to slump now

…then in the paly-offs…Slump aways boys!

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Feb 15, 2010 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Better to slump

now than in the playoffs is true….even though during a 17 game stretch you are over .500 it shouldn’t count as a slump…..man,who is gonna wait 2 weeks for the olympics to pass…this sucks!

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 1:27 PM CST up reply actions  

That is what i was trying to figure out

but i had no luck at all….i do admit that the D and the forwards have been turning the puck over more than earlier in the season,hence the eason that Q benched Steeger for the 2nd and 3rd periods yesterday,however i still haven’t been able to see anythin that would gimme a clue to the reason for the so many goals allowed lately

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 1:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Beware of the "quality shot" rabbit hole...

…these data are malleable and, if tortured enough, will confess to anything.

I think when an argument reaches this point, people simply have to agree to disagree.

Having said that, I’m right. The problem, to the extent there is a problem, is more goalie than defense.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 1:22 PM CST up reply actions  

You trying to say

there isn’t a problem?or that big of a problem that everyone is making it out to be?

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 1:25 PM CST up reply actions  

The latter

Quoting myself below:

Our guys are our guys. Plainly, they’ve been good enough so far, but by no means great. Goaltending is important but ultimately overrated. This team is great.

As it pertains to this parituclar argument though (who’s at fault for increase in goals allowed?), my point is that the argument has reached an impasse.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 1:34 PM CST up reply actions  

Hahahahahaha

i’m done for today…i’ll try and come up with some new theories tomorrow and for the rest of this 2 week layoff

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 1:43 PM CST up reply actions  

"scraping these wins"

That’s it exactly.

A really good young team learning to win games where they don’t play all that great.

by ballyb on Feb 15, 2010 2:46 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd say part goaltending...

…part more lapses that create quality chances. And therein lies the debate.

Putting the 25 SOG allowed into perspective, this is the period over which the defense has been “lit up”. The Hawks typically allow 24 shots a game. This number is completely off the charts- #2 in the league is more than 27 / game.

I happen to think the Hawks .883 SV% during the stretch might have more explanatory power than defensive breakdown, but this argument is starting to feel like another goalie debate rabbit hole.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 12:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Hahahahahaha

It seems like a loop….you go and blame the goalies a little,and then you see the D make a mistake which is inevitable,and then you blame the D and say they aren’t that good…donno,just hope they take care of this problem before the playoffs start…again,i donno know if i’m being a homer or not,but i do think that the fact that 11 of those 17 games have been on the road,and that has affected their play

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm gonna go with AirTrafficAJ's error chain

it’s not one thing necessarily, just more than a few things going wrong around the same time.

Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.

by chiblackhawks on Feb 15, 2010 1:03 PM CST up reply actions  

i agree with that

but i guess the question is will these things that have gone wrong at the same time stop,or will the trend continue..hahaha,i’m losin it!!!

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 1:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Was he the one

who compared it to the QB/receiver debate? Because that’s exactly what this is — can’t blame one, because it’s a chain.

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 1:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Every time you mention my "error chain"

You owe me 5 bucks, or a “that’s what she said”.

Your choice.

"To the BeeMobile!"
"You mean your Chevy?"
"...yes."

by AirTrafficAJ on Feb 15, 2010 2:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Put the doggy in the bathtub!

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 5:43 PM CST up reply actions  

It’s too hard; and it’s painful.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 6:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I was thinking the exact same thing last night

“Maybe the Minny loss wasn’t such a learning experience?”

But then I thought it through a little further and realized that maybe it really was. Without that blow up and the resulting mediocre play, we might walk into the playoff with a misplaced sense of invincibility (can you say Sharks?). I think the timing was perfect. Now the Hawks’ brass has 2 weeks to step back and address some of the issues that have come to light. As a result, I look forward to the Hawks being more grounded and definitely more prepared for the task that lies ahead.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 12:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Absolutely on Johnsson

People say our guys are young, but I still don’t think playing almost half of every game during the regular season is good for anybody. Even though they’re not the ones getting hurt, I’ve been wondering how long it’d be before injuries struck us again (no way we were getting through the whole season as healthy as we were), and I’ve been really worried about our top D men.

Interestingly I think I read somewhere that he’d be moved around a bit, and I did seem to notice him out there with the Other Meatball a bit — was that just on shift changes, or maybe PK time?

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 11:49 AM CST up reply actions  

they had

2 shifts together in the first, 1 shift in the 2nd, and 4 in the 3rd.

PK shifts include 1 shift in 1st, the lone shift in the 2nd, and 2 shifts in the 3rd.

Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.

by chiblackhawks on Feb 15, 2010 12:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I make most of my important decisions based on booze

With Huet, I drink cause I have to
With Neimi, I drink cause I want to

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Feb 15, 2010 11:43 AM CST reply actions   1 recs

HAHAHAHA!

this guys is nuts!!!I’m McLovin it!!!!!I realize that we can’t get a better goalie because there isn’t one available,however,i am a bit worried about the D and blowin late leads,thats all

by csm on Feb 15, 2010 12:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Instant rec

Thanks. I might not be the biggest offender but I’m guilty as charged as well. I’ll shut up now.

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 12:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Thank-you.

I think we’ve all had heard enough about this goaltender debate.

Let the Olympic spirit live in everyone.
GO CANADA GO!
Congratulations to Alexandre Bilodeau on being the first Canadian to win on home soil.

by hawks61 on Feb 15, 2010 12:12 PM CST up reply actions  

Well said

Let’s just take these two weeks and enjoy the best hockey we’re about to see in our lifetime.

Let’s also take the time to enjoy, in my mind, the best celebration of sports in the Olympics as it’s really amazing to witness athlete’s, whom you’ve never heard of before, achieve the heights of greatness that brings more national pride than anything can.

But for arguements sake, the ‘Hawks 41 wins in 61 games is the best in the entire NHL. Just sayin’.

Let the Olympic spirit live in everyone.
GO CANADA GO!
Congratulations to Alexandre Bilodeau on being the first Canadian to win on home soil.

by hawks61 on Feb 15, 2010 12:10 PM CST up reply actions  

But there has been progress...

…not one ninnyheaded trade proposal on the entire thread.

I actually think Hawk Nation is groping toward a consensus position I have long-embraced, viz.:

Our guys are our guys. Plainly, they’ve been good enough so far, but by no means great. Goaltending is important but ultimately overrated. This team is great.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 15, 2010 12:25 PM CST up reply actions  

...execpt for Barker...he was not our guy.

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Feb 15, 2010 1:17 PM CST up reply actions  

A fairer way of putting it might be to say

that the Hawks outgrew Barker. Ultimately, if both the short and long term results of this trade work out, we should be thanking him.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 1:36 PM CST up reply actions  

Imagine if we traded Kaner think of the

………. both the short and long term results of this trade work

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Feb 15, 2010 1:40 PM CST up reply actions  

forget I said that

"Trying is the first step towards failure" Homer Simpson

by ccm on Feb 15, 2010 1:43 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm try to do

but it’s etched in my brain like a prolapsed asshole ;)

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 1:53 PM CST up reply actions  

like i said before in an earlier post

Im done with it for the rest of the year! I refuse to comment or read any post that says anything about goalies unless its: “said goaltender had a great game!” or something positive! This is ridiculous! Enjoy the team we have seeing as how I haven’t seen a hawks team this good in over a decade!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 15, 2010 12:56 PM CST up reply actions  

If anything

the debate should be taken “outside” — as in, to a FanPost. Ideally if we could make a new section that is lower than FanPosts it would belong there.

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 1:44 PM CST up reply actions  

The amazing part of all of this

is that I posted the Borg boycott comment LAST NIGHT before all this hell broke lose!

I definitely will take my fair share of the blame, but it’s like we’re all the dog from the movie “Up!” We see someone post a goalie’s name and it’s like “Squirrel!” We all instinctively drop what we we’re talking about and start chasing a rodent down a rabbit hole.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 2:00 PM CST up reply actions  

It sucks you in

Once you start… it can only end in tears.

by VerStig on Feb 15, 2010 3:07 PM CST up reply actions  

The boycott is a great idea...

Suggestion: Let’s treat it like a drinking game… when someone brings up our “G-spot”, since we collectively cannot ignore it (this has been established, I’m guilty as sin here)
 
reply with something random as hell, like how’s the weather, pork doughnuts, etc. and applaud the most brilliant effort to go a different direction.

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 10:45 PM CST up reply actions  

To be fair

The national media would give Chicago a lot more credibility if Derek Lee or Carlos Quentin would get photographed banging Madonna. If the sox get Johnny Damon, it’s a step in the right direction of insanity.

"To the BeeMobile!"
"You mean your Chevy?"
"...yes."

by AirTrafficAJ on Feb 15, 2010 2:18 PM CST up reply actions  

Madonna?

Those chicks in the limo were 50 times better looking than that skank

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 2:23 PM CST up reply actions  

But

You can fit an entire party complete with a limo inside Madonna she’s been out and around long enough.

wait what?

by pepe126 on Feb 15, 2010 2:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Maybe from here on out

the Hawks should play Niemi & Huet like starting and relief pitchers. Split time between goalies when the rest of the team is playing good or bad will settle this #1 garbage.
By the way, I hope this comment comes across as stupid as I want it to.

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 12:23 PM CST reply actions  

BOYCOTTED!

And yes, complete success ;)

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 12:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Now that that's out of the way,

I can concentrate on more important things like tying my shoes or remembering to inhale and exhale in order to get oxygen to my brain.

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 12:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Talent? Yah, we've got that covered.

I know our defence wasn’t the greatest over the weekend but you can’t complain about how those games played out as both were suprisingly highly entertaining, especially yesterday with the ’hawks playing in less than 24 hours.

Niemi wasn’t the greatest out there but made the key saves when called upon, which is no different than what any other goaltender is asked of in this league. If not for Garon the ‘hawks would’ve won this game 10-4 he was that good for the Jackets.

Patrick “Devil on my Shoulder” Kane is as tough as nails. He took one massive, clean hit and just got up and decided that he was at that point going to make the Jackets pay the best way he can and took the game over and made Garon look like a rented mule on the shootout attempt. The kid is fuckin’ good.

Props to Troy Boy who is starting to remind me of Kevin Stevens back in the day. A power forward that can take care of the stars with his toughness yet has a excellent touch around the net that could pot 25-30 goals (which he could this year). Trust me there’s not a lot of these guys in the league right now and with his $1.2 million salary he may have surpassed Sharpie as the best bargain for the ’hawks right now.

Let the Olympic spirit live in everyone.
GO CANADA GO!
Congratulations to Alexandre Bilodeau on being the first Canadian to win on home soil.

by hawks61 on Feb 15, 2010 12:30 PM CST reply actions  

Speaking of figure skating

Now I was pretty drunk at this point mind you, but did the German pair come out dressed like our PP? As soon as I seen those costumes that’s what I was thinking of. Who else thought the same thing?

Let the Olympic spirit live in everyone.
GO CANADA GO!
Congratulations to Alexandre Bilodeau on being the first Canadian to win on home soil.

by hawks61 on Feb 15, 2010 12:38 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

HAHA Hilarious

No I didn’t think that when i saw it but i do know exactly what you are talking about

September 26, 2007 The day a Franchise was reborn.

by Roos-34 on Feb 15, 2010 12:45 PM CST up reply actions  

lol no, but a friend on Twitter made this astute observation
This guy has a stop light on his chest, with the Go near his crotch. Take that how you will, America.

Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.

by chiblackhawks on Feb 15, 2010 12:58 PM CST up reply actions  

That was my first thought when I saw them!

Second thought – hope you perform better than the Hawks’ PP

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 1:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Anyone unemployed like me?

I think I’m going to watch the USA game tomorrow at a bar. 2pm start time.

"Another successful interaction with a man!" - Liz Lemon

by Sportsgal on Feb 15, 2010 1:38 PM CST reply actions  

What Bar?

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 1:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Actually, I can't go.

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 1:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Beware

It’s a 2pm Pacific time start.

"To the BeeMobile!"
"You mean your Chevy?"
"...yes."

by AirTrafficAJ on Feb 15, 2010 2:18 PM CST up reply actions  

According to NBC (Chicago Time)

USA vs Switzerland is 2 PM Chicago time Tuesday on USA network

http://www.nbcolympics.com/tv-listings/zone=CT/sport=IH/index.html

Later on Tuesday, Canada vs Norway is at 7:00 on CNBC

On late Wednesday, Slovakia takes on Czech Republic at 11:30PM on CNBC

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 2:55 PM CST up reply actions  

My mistake.

Thanks for that.

"To the BeeMobile!"
"You mean your Chevy?"
"...yes."

by AirTrafficAJ on Feb 15, 2010 6:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Unemployed, but lovin the “new” hockey!

/Note unceasing sarcastic laughter in background.

by burpchelischili on Feb 15, 2010 2:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Also,

I just want to brag again,The best wife in the world got 2 tickets to the Hawks/blues game on Mar 30th. Section 118, ON THE FUCKING GLASS!
Funny part of it, is that she didn’t know what she was doing, she just figured that the more expensive seat would have a better view than the balcony.

/Note unceasing sarcastic laughter in background.

by burpchelischili on Feb 15, 2010 2:26 PM CST reply actions  

On the Glass?

Wouldn’t a seat be more comfortable?

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 2:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Like my face will not be 2mm away from it at ALL times, lol

/Note unceasing sarcastic laughter in background.

by burpchelischili on Feb 16, 2010 3:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Has anyone played Tiger's Transgressions Golf?

I didn’t get seats on the glass from my wife, but she did send me this link from work today. I scored a 30 on my first try. 32 on my second.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 2:30 PM CST reply actions  

I posted that on this blog, like, two months ago!

"Another successful interaction with a man!" - Liz Lemon

by Sportsgal on Feb 15, 2010 3:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Are you calling my wife 'slow'?!

I think I remember you telling people to STFU regarding the goalie debate at about that time too.
She how far that got you? ;)

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 3:08 PM CST up reply actions  

it’s true. i remember.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 6:30 PM CST up reply actions  

in fact, you posted it twice, because it got lost in a post flurry following a goal or something.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 6:31 PM CST up reply actions  

It seems this made an impression on you

so fess up. What’s your low score?

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 7:32 PM CST up reply actions  

Is that where you drive the ball to pick off the mistress...

…before she gets to the TV truck?

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 3:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes

Once the ho gets inside, the van starts bouncing up and down like it’s in an East L.A. parade, cameras flash, and there’s cheering and…
Oh wait, that was spring break ’90. My bad.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 3:14 PM CST up reply actions  

ah, the thrill of scoring a "ho in one"...

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 6:54 PM CST up reply actions  

23 on the first try

I knew all that high school golf would come in handy one day…

THE CAP IS COMING! THE CAP IS COMING! REPENT ALL YE BANDWAGONERS FOR THE CAPOCALYPSE IS NEAR!

by ahnfire on Feb 16, 2010 1:32 AM CST up reply actions  

I'm late to the thread, once again ...

But what does everyone think of the goaltenders? Just curious.

www.mjt.org

by ChicoMaki on Feb 15, 2010 3:15 PM CST reply actions  

LOL Hey guys! Playing cards??

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 3:17 PM CST up reply actions  

For Team Canada, I like Brodeur, and for USA, like Ryan Miller...

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 6:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Completely unrelated to hockey but

did the person interviewing with the Stars fan last week get the job?

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 3:52 PM CST reply actions  

That sucks, I'm sorry

Dallas is way less awesome than Chicago. And you’d have had to put up with Stars and Cowboys fans. And Dallas will not be nearly as ecstatic as Chicago will be when the Hawks win.

I’m assuming you do not live in Dallas and love it.

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 5:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Assumption correct … but I actually don’t know anything about this. Just thought it was a good chance to make veiled reference to Huet/Niemi.

www.mjt.org

by ChicoMaki on Feb 15, 2010 5:24 PM CST up reply actions  

Aw, internet friends.

www.mjt.org

by ChicoMaki on Feb 15, 2010 6:48 PM CST up reply actions  

HEY!

That’s so tricky of you, I genuinely felt bad for you!

It’s not nice to play tricks on a gullible person when it’s her birthday.

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 7:04 PM CST up reply actions  

At least you're not a bottle brunette

But, seriously, how could you miss that? It was one of the greatest witty replies I’ve seen on this site. “backup interviewee” Classic!

Happy birthday! Unless you’re just eliciting sympathy.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 7:14 PM CST up reply actions  

oh hey

katherine*215*

that makes sense now

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 7:15 PM CST up reply actions  

I know, it was hilarious

once it was pointed out to me. I’m oblivious sometimes. Ok, a lot of the time.

What can I say? I’m old today.

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 7:31 PM CST up reply actions  

how old is old? 90? 75? 25? 16?

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 7:34 PM CST up reply actions  

faugh!

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 7:41 PM CST up reply actions  

oh, you know, i studied medieval lit for a while.

 basically, you’re not old (although you may be older than me).

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 7:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I am older than you

by 3 years.

And I googled faugh. Just was not sure why you were saying it

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 8:07 PM CST up reply actions  

you seem pretty sure about your 3 year statement.

i have no idea why i responded with faugh. i say it a lot.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 8:20 PM CST up reply actions  

did he mean...

Corey Crawford the goalie?

or…

Johnny Crawford the Rifleman?

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 8:25 PM CST up reply actions  

or did i mean cindy crawford?

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 8:26 PM CST up reply actions  

there was also the bit where i said we’re almost the same person

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 8:34 PM CST up reply actions  

wasn't that the same conversation?

They say the memory is the first to go…they’re right

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

what are you talking about? i forgot.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

this is

the longest chain of replies I have ever seen! I want to see how small they can get!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 16, 2010 12:53 AM CST up reply actions  

Oh and

thats what she said!

Drink it up!

by SharpFTW10 on Feb 16, 2010 12:53 AM CST up reply actions  

I've seen smaller

She also said that.

wait what?

by pepe126 on Feb 16, 2010 12:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Prob because it sounds like and is used like

“Fan!” in Swedish. Never looked up the etymology, but I wonder if there is a common root. I use it occasionally too. I’m used to the odd looks.

Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.

by ChicagoNativeSon on Feb 15, 2010 8:24 PM CST up reply actions  

I love using “fan.”

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 8:27 PM CST up reply actions  

you're young...

trust me on this…

you got twenty years before the wheels start falling off…

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 7:45 PM CST up reply actions  

I know, mostly I'm kidding

It is sad to know I’m in my last year of my 20s though

by Katherine215 on Feb 15, 2010 7:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Happy Birthday!

Watch out though, for women the wheels tend to fall off earlier. ;) But you’ve still got over a decade.

2009 SCH Post Whore
2010 Troll Collector
SCH's Resident Mom

by Trixietrx on Feb 15, 2010 8:12 PM CST up reply actions  

don't worry

my wheels fell off long ago.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 8:27 PM CST up reply actions  

:) ?

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 8:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Happy Birthday!

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 7:39 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm so tired of this goalie debate: Here's a solution

It’s time we went with this guy:

He has tons of playoff expereience. He hasn’t lost a game in 27 years, which was also the last time he gave up a soft goal. He looks like he’s a better goalie. He isn’t French. He’s never given up a goal in a shootout. And I hear the players are more confident with him in goal.

We may want to buy him some new pads though.

Chicagoan in the Lou.

by Mike Martin on Feb 15, 2010 4:57 PM CST reply actions   1 recs

OK, but

he needs a dreamcatcher on his mask.

2009 SCH Post Whore
2010 Troll Collector
SCH's Resident Mom

by Trixietrx on Feb 15, 2010 4:59 PM CST up reply actions  

If he's not available

maybe we can get this guy

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 6:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Nah, Carey Price sucks.

Just ask the Habs.

"To the BeeMobile!"
"You mean your Chevy?"
"...yes."

by AirTrafficAJ on Feb 15, 2010 6:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm still scarred by that...

But good to know someone out there is old enough to feel my pain.

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 7:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes. Yes. Yes.

This teenager broke a radio that night. I went on You Tube last week and listened to Lloyd Petit’s call of the end of the 7th game of that series.

Still sounds miserable. Petit was great, the game — not so much.

by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Feb 15, 2010 7:37 PM CST up reply actions  

you’re a teenager? or are you referring to some specific teenager that i don’t know?

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 7:42 PM CST up reply actions  

oh, nevermind.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 7:42 PM CST up reply actions  

got a link?

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 7:48 PM CST up reply actions  

1961 Blackhawks

1961 BlackHawks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sB-csuX0GBk

By the way, they beat SCUM to win it!

Gunzo’s sells the DVD for $17.95…

http://www.gunzos.com/c211/THE-FORGOTTEN-CHAMPS-p7915.html

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 8:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Wasn't quite 3 years old for that one - so I don't recall

and there were only 6 teams back then – so it was generally beating Montreal or Detroit (NYR, Boston and Toronto rather regularly sucked – though Toronto didn’t suck like nowadays)

by krome on Feb 15, 2010 8:13 PM CST up reply actions  

I was 4! LOL

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 8:18 PM CST up reply actions  

I was a fetus

But I remember it well.

2009 SCH Post Whore
2010 Troll Collector
SCH's Resident Mom

by Trixietrx on Feb 16, 2010 8:42 AM CST up reply actions  

I was six...

…so it’s one of those seared-in memories. I’ll be drooling into my afghan a few decades hence, but I’ll still remember THAT!

by cliffkoroll on Feb 16, 2010 9:38 AM CST up reply actions  

reply fail...

…meant to tag on to 1971 comments below.

by cliffkoroll on Feb 16, 2010 9:40 AM CST up reply actions  

1971 blackhawks

This is what I could dig up:
http://fans.blackhawks.nhl.com/topic/19988/t/7th-Game-Stanley-Cup-Final-in-71.html

Lloyd Pettit was the greatest announcer EVER no disrespect to anyone else, I grew up on this… (and home games were blacked out)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsXYB0qYyvM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hSLxD5mIKg&feature=related

Many of the SRO crowd had climbed onto the rafters for this one. No matter what the crowd ACTUALLY was, because of the fire codes, it was always listed as 16,666 (or something like that) there was fog on the ice, and Tony-o let in a shot from center ice because of it.

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 8:17 PM CST up reply actions  

For me

that game was and is to this day the worst memory I have of any sporting event. I just remember being so pissed I had to run out of the house.

Competitive violence, that's why you're here!

by cdz3210 on Feb 15, 2010 9:27 PM CST up reply actions  

Same here

I hoping that this wonderful team will remove all of that pain…

I sure wanna see them hoist that cup before I’m done.

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 10:57 PM CST up reply actions  

off topic completely

gmh, your call on the sour cream donut was right on.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 6:34 PM CST reply actions  

Sounds like a heart attack to me...

pork flavoed doughnuts… lol

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 8:29 PM CST up reply actions  

that sounds disgusting

but not more than these: http://medousa.vox.com/library/post/aji-ichinban-meat-candy.html

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 8:31 PM CST up reply actions  

I've been to Japan a few times...

And some of the menu selections are… amazing?

One of my favorite websites is www.engrish.com

The Japanese are always trying to find western sounding titles that are catchy, and often go horribly wrong.

I can always find something at this website that makes me laugh. Try it!

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 9:44 PM CST up reply actions  

engrish!

I saw a middle-aged, respectable Japanese tourist in Turkey one time. He had on a baseball cap that said something along the lines of: Gold Fuck Tap. I don’t remember it exactly, but my friends and I couldn’t stop laughing.

All right, come on, dummy, you won the game. Come on. Pick up your trophy.

by meeshak on Feb 15, 2010 9:48 PM CST up reply actions  

on the plane home once...

The teenager sitting in front of me was proudly wearing a t-shirt that said “what the fucking are you doing?”

"My Father's name is Jack, and my mother's name is Daniels..."

by Byfuglie33 on Feb 15, 2010 9:53 PM CST up reply actions  

didn't realize until now...

just how much I rove engrish! That site is hilarious; my favorite so far was the “sweet dream” cake packaging.

by K_Dog on Feb 16, 2010 10:01 AM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SBN's source for all things Chicago Blackhawks. Online home of The Committed Indian. Please don't take this place seriously.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Aylettcaterstickwith_small
Those Trade Rumours Explained
Aylettcaterstickwith_small
On The Road Again

Recent FanPosts

Small
USA Hockey Hall Of Fame Design
Small
Penalty Kill Advanced Statistics
Q3_small
The Hawks Vs Lesser Opponents
Small
Dear Coach Q
Ice_small
New Thread Feb 4
Small
Anybody who plays in rec leagues needs to watch this
Aylettcaterstickwith_small
It's All Mememe
Harris__hawks_2_small
Badgerdano'd

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Triumvirate of Stupid

Photo_11_small Killion

34548_409975644603_503814603_4258799_6800286_n_small SamFels

Chicago_flag_small McClure

Actual Intelligence

Airstaff_waddle250_small Hack

Morning Links

Dualflags_small chelischili7

Gatorfly_small JuliaM

Moderator

Vertical_hold_2_small Skags

H121125a_small SKeen

Zombiepanda_small ahnfire

Cartman_hawk2_small stacie7