Between the Lines: First Round Mutual +/- Report
Phew. So we've survived Round 1 of the Joel Quenneville line scrambling carousel. At the end of the regular season, we had a money line of Sharp-Toews-Hossa, also known as the "Hammer of the Gods," and a fourth line that had finally found some chemistry and was chipping in some offense to boot.
What happened? After stumbling upon the wall that was the Nashville Predators blue line (and you might argue, our own, as far as clearing it was concerned), Coach Q jumbled, we mumbled (and moaned), and, well -- maybe it worked!
![]() Bickell me Elmo! |
How do we tell? Well, we can use the stat I invented: Mutual +/-. For those of you who don't remember that FanPost (and let's be honest -- who did?), Mutual +/- is just like regular plus-minus, except that it's calculated for each pair of players on the team.
The objective is to answer the question: how well did each player play with everybody else? Well, let's take a look at the Blackhawks' Mutual +/- for the Round 1 against Nashville...
(remember: the gray numbers along the diagonal are each player's traditional +/- for the series)
Observations
- TOFTBO! Okay, no goals were scored against the 'Hawks when Niklas Hjalmarsson was on the ice. So, he played well with everyone. Way to bogart all the pluses, Niko.
- Brent Sopel also played extremely well, except when he was paired with Jordan Hendry. You can see why mama's boy was scratched for the latter half of the series.
- Likewise, you can see what became of that fourth line chemistry. Ben Eager and Colin Fraser were flat across the board (granted, they played limited minutes), in contrast to that whopping +10 that Eager and Tomas Kopecky were playing together in the regular season.
- Duncan Keith suffered from a lack of offensive production, and, arguably, being less solid than normal. Or was it just having to cover for Dustin Byfuglien (hence their mutual -3)? Think he missed the Norris-showcasing effects of Brent Seabrook?
- Bryan Bickell provided a huge spark -- he was a positive Mutual +/- with all of our top scorers -- Tazer, 20 Cent, Panda, and Sharpie. He was even a plus with good 'ole Dunky!
- Brian Campbell also helped stabilize the D corps. As somebody mentioned, it doesn't hurt that he took blue line minutes away from Buff.
- Marian Hossa's hard work showed despite his lack of production for most of the series. Except when he was paired with Lazy Kaner, of course.
- There's a lot more, but I'll let you guys duke it out in the comments section.
Thanks for reading -- I know you were here just for the free food, but I don't have any edible treats this time... but instead, you get a stats-post reader's reward: enter the coupon code PUNCHTHECABBIE at checkout and receive a special discount on The Days of Our Defense from Amazon.com!*
* Neither VerStig nor Second City Hockey are in any way affiliated with Amazon.com. Though, we wish CNS was!
14 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'M TOTALLY ORDERING THAT
and it’ll come in time for my birthday too!
Great job on the post! (as usual)
Frazzle & Bur both played 3 games, but Bur was a minus while Frazzle broke even. I know they probably switched to Burish to provide a spark, but if he’s going to be a negative, I’d prefer Fraz back there to be even & let our general dislike of the Canucks provide sparks.
Okay, no goals were scored against the ’Hawks when Niklas Hjalmarsson was on the ice. So, he played well with everyone.
Think he’ll get another email from mom?
Brouwer – W. T. F? Where has that guy gone? What a bad time of the year for him to become Mr. Irrelevant. That’s why I was all for Bickell playing on the top line and not Troy. I’m not sure though if their respective numbers are mostly a product of the lines they played on or actually indicative of their individual play – or both? The eye tests says the former is true IMO. You could have told me that Brouwer was scratched in a few games and I probably would have believed you.
BAHAHAHAHA! Just noticed the Amazon ad! Hilarious! I was “keeping notes” down here in the comment section as I was reading through your post. Too funny. Damn, do you have a program that will allow me to rec this twice??
BTW, 20 cents? I didn’t know we wrote Kane into the script?
Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.
by ChicagoNativeSon on Apr 29, 2010 11:32 PM CDT reply actions
Oh, and the “Look inside” is priceless
Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.
by ChicagoNativeSon on Apr 29, 2010 11:33 PM CDT up reply actions
Yep
nice finishing touch!
So what I get out of looking at this is we have some good ideas on how well players mesh, but it also shows which players carry other teammates. And I also see that it’s not all that great in regard to special players sent out for specific roles, where sure, +/- is important but doesn’t tell the whole story.
Thanks for putting this together!
2009 SCH Post Whore
2010 Troll Collector
SCH's Resident Mom
The sun never sets on a badass
maybe comparative stats
of checking lines against top teams?
But when it was suggested to him that Toews v. Kane seems likely to become a sidebar to every future international hockey tournament, he smiled and said: "I'd like us to win something together, too."
(Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.)
by chiblackhawks on May 5, 2010 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions
Perhaps
Having a stable checking line — which we don’t exactly have — would help… plus Q likes to use the top line against the opposing top line (not working this series, apparently), so I’m not sure how that would taint the results.
I guess what I’m looking for is a good defense-only stat. Maybe just shots directed against, without the for part?
good point on the stability of the lines
shots against could give you a better idea, yeah.
But when it was suggested to him that Toews v. Kane seems likely to become a sidebar to every future international hockey tournament, he smiled and said: "I'd like us to win something together, too."
(Tweets @ChiBlackhawks and blogs at Blackhawks Down Low.)
by chiblackhawks on May 5, 2010 1:19 PM CDT up reply actions
"Having a stable checking line — which we don’t exactly have — would help"
Heh. Going to be cool to see how different Ladd’s numbers are now.
This chart makes me want to take a closer look at Ladd.
He posted surprisingly bad numbers across the board. He and Brouwer both look unimpressive on this chart, and I don’t think that it’s a coincidence that they played on a line together quite a bit. The third line has been invisible lately.
by spokeinthebandwagon on Apr 30, 2010 7:18 AM CDT reply actions
"This chart makes me want to take a closer look at Ladd."
Hey, I’ll tell you what. You can get a good look at a butcher’s ass by sticking your head up there, but wouldn’t you rather take his word for it? No, I mean is… You can get a good look at a T-bone by sticking your head up a butcher’s ass… No, wait. It’s gotta be your bull.
Well, folks, I want to thank you for being here for the recording of my live comedy album. Funny material and laughter will be dubbed in later.
by ChicagoNativeSon on Apr 30, 2010 7:29 AM CDT up reply actions
Looking at that
Good, Excellent idea to get Buff off of the Blue Line!
Get off my Land!
ART.I§8-11; AM I-XXVII
James Madison is my Hero!
by Toews-makes-funny-faces on Apr 30, 2010 5:45 PM CDT reply actions

by 


























