SB Nation Chicago Editor's Pick
Fits like a glove...
...or other possible injuries for your Blackhawks defensemen. With news coming out about Chris Campoli's hidden injuries today, Brian Campbell's foot injuries already semi-well known, Brent Seabrook's ailments being fairly obvious, and Nick Leddy suffering from nothing more severe than the NHL's second worse case of Horse Face, that leaves just one more question to answer: just what on earth was wrong with Duncan Keith and Niklas Hjalmarsson?
My pops and I attended the Blackhawks-Maple Leafs game back in March, and before the game we did what any self-respecting hockey fan does on a rare trip to Toronto: we visited the Hockey Hall of Fame. For any hockey fan who has never been, I highly recommend a trip if you get the chance. If you get wrapped up in the frivolities of hockey, it's something you can really enjoy, especially little things like the gloves Wayne Gretzky wore when he scored his 24th goal in 1989 or the stick Steven Stamkos used to score a goal in some international tournament that you didn't even know existed before. The season following the Blackhawks' Stanley Cup Championship, of course, was the best time to go because a lot of the displays had items relating to the Cup run: Brent Seabrook's skates and Dustin Byfuglien's shoulder pads were among the items available to the viewing public. But in this situation there was one in particular that caught my eye: Brent Sopel's gloves.
For those who can't read it, the card basically said that the equipment staff modified these gloves to offer Sopel more protection in penalty killing situations.
How is that relevant? Well, check out the gloves Keith was wearing in warmups for the Toronto game:
via oi51.tinypic.com
If you remember, Keith left that game with some sort of hand injury (I didn't see the play he was hurt on, and without access to Twitter in the strange, foreign land of Canada I didn't catch what anyone else thought caused it either). On the other hand, check out Keith's mitts in the Vancouver series. 
via oi54.tinypic.com
For some reason, Keith has switched from Bauer gloves to Warrior gloves. While these clearly don't look as reinforced as Sopes' Blocker, they do appear a little bit bulkier than the Bauer gloves and could have been beefed up a little less dramatically to allow Keith to wear them in all situations.
Duncs wasn't the only one. Here's the Swedish Meatball rocking some Reeboks:
via oi54.tinypic.com
and later on opting to move to Warrior as well
via oi52.tinypic.com
I noticed the switch far sooner than the Vancouver series, but figured it was just because I have a strange obsession with hockey gloves (when I first started playing when I was 10, all the equipment I had was used except for the gloves, so that was probably why). This doesn't really prove any kind of a finger or hand injury exists for either player, but it was just something that jumped out on me.
How would hand injuries have hampered the play of the Hawks' rearguard when it seemed that most of the problems existed between the ears? A hand injury could have been a factor in contributing to some of the sub-par passing in the Vancouver series and much of the regular season (which plagued the whole team and not just these 2 gentlemen). Maybe Hjalmarsson's desire to very quickly blindly fire every puck as far away from him as possible stemmed from not wanting to be slashed in the hands. Or maybe this was all much ado about nothing and I was simply tired of my internal debate for who I should be cheering for in the Red Wings- Sharks series (the answer is obvious for many of you, but the only consideration I make is 'who has the best chance of beating Vancouver?').
Campoli's mysterious injury proved that there are probably many out there we don't (and likely won't) know about. But if anybody mentions a hand/finger injury on Duncs or Hammer, you heard it here first. Or, you know, somewhere else.
13 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great post
But I do remember McClure mentioning the glove switch right after it happened. In any event, I really enjoyed this, if only for the picture of Sopel’s glove (that thing is almost a blocker).
And here’s hoping SJ can finish off Detroit and we’ll never have to take sides in a DET/VAN series.
"I have only space enough to add: against the assault of desperate pandas nothing can stand."
-ChicoMaki (channeling Mark Twain)
by HungryHungryPanda on May 5, 2011 8:32 AM CDT reply actions
McClure's a sharp cat
I wouldn’t be surprised if he mentioned it. Luckily I included “somewhere else” as a possible option, so I’m technically still right.
According Twomey- information you didn't know you didn't need
Also, Logan Couture has some pretty serious Horse Face as well

"I have only space enough to add: against the assault of desperate pandas nothing can stand."
-ChicoMaki (channeling Mark Twain)
by HungryHungryPanda on May 5, 2011 8:36 AM CDT reply actions
Hall, Couture, and Leddy
All rookies, too. Can you imagine those three as Calder finalists? I mean, people would be like “what is this an award for horses?” It’d be funny to hear pundits debate their chances by discussing the thoughts of “naysayers.”
OK I’m done.
According Twomey- information you didn't know you didn't need
rec'd
very interesting theory.
I don’t want to hijack the conversation, but you brought it up with this re SJ-Scum:
the only consideration I make is ‘who has the best chance of beating Vancouver?’
I’m with you 100% on this. And while I thought Scum had a better chance to beat the Nucks, I’m really impressed with the way SJ is playing right now.
But there was a Bruins troll sniffing around an older post recently who questioned the depth of Blackhawk fans’ commitment based on rooting for Scum. He wagged his finger and said that for Bruins fans, Montreal was first, last, and always the #1 enemy, suggesting this makes Bruins fans better than Hawk fans.
I didn’t want to feed the troll, but I do want to share my perspective on this.
Montral-Boston is an historic rivalry, dating back into the mists of time, like Bears-Packers. Hawks-Scum is not like this.
In the old original 6, Scum’s big rival was Toronto- makes sense geographically and competitively. Anyone interested in hockey history can find a trove of stories about this rivalry. Unfortunately, this rivalry has basically been sundered by putting the two in different conferences.
The Hawks and Rangers were kinda afterhtoughts in the old league, neither being very good.
In recent decades, Hawks-Scum has become a good rivalry, but it’s not obvious to me that it’s more intense than Hawks-Blues.
And very recent history, meeting three consecutive years in the playoffs, has put the Hawks-Nucks rivalry on the map.
I guess my point is it’s OK to have more than one rival (Sox-Twins sure, but what about Detroit or Cleveland, Cubs-Cards, but remember the (now dimmed) Cubs-Mets?
Historic preserved rivalries like Habs-Bruins, Bears-Packers, or Yankees-Red Sox are rare things, but nothing about the existence of these rivalries suggests that somehow these fans are better than fans of other teams.
/end defensive rant
We like our people!
I hate St Louis more than Detroit
It’s the Detroit fans who I want to kick in the nuggets. Although the SLGT crowd is giving them a run for their money.
Lord Stanley's new address: Sweet home Chicago!
(Short sale pending)
by ChicagoNativeSon on May 5, 2011 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions
For us, there was the common ownership issue going way back
the Norris family effectively controled both Detroit and Chicago, and constantly screwed Chicago over in one way deals
Confusion will be my epitaph.
The Cup is ours until someone takes it from us.
It needs more cowbell.
good point Cliff
I hadn’t thought about the rivalries like that before. I’m going to use this rationale to justify my slightly waning hatred for Detroit…I was starting to feel self-conscious about it.
Yep, I also feel the hatred for the Blues is more intense currently. Also, I still really hate those fucking Minnesota North Stars. Is this a problem?
I think a big issue for me as well is that Vancouver as a franchise has long been tortured by an inability to win the Cup. Love em or hate em, that hasn’t really been a problem for Detroit lately. It feels to me kind of like a little brother thing, like the Hawks have achieved something great after years of failure, and I don’t want that failure to end for Vancouver just yet.
Perhaps a poor example, but if you’re a White Sox fan and you had to pick a team to cheer for in a Twins-Cubs World Series, wouldn’t you hope the Twins would win just to see the Cubs continue to suffer?
Detroit may be our biggest rival, but I definitely have a lot more hatred for Vancouver and St. Louis. But you make a good point Cliff, and it’s been said that playoff series are great builders of a rivalry. If in next season’s playoffs we wind up playing the Wings and missing the Canucks, I’m sure Detroit would jump straight back to the top of my hated teams list.
According Twomey- information you didn't know you didn't need
Nice "catch" Twomey
I think the Keith injury was known, but definitely not a possible Hammer one.
One thing about Hammer though, he’s a tough SOB. There weren’t many games where he didn’t limp off the ice from taking a puck – and he’d be right back out there.
Lord Stanley's new address: Sweet home Chicago!
(Short sale pending)
by ChicagoNativeSon on May 5, 2011 12:46 PM CDT reply actions
Thanks CNS
though I might suggest you skip a trip to the HHOF- not nearly enough Jeff Shantz for your liking.
According Twomey- information you didn't know you didn't need
I never really considered a piece of equipment mine until I had modified it in some way
Confusion will be my epitaph.
The Cup is ours until someone takes it from us.
It needs more cowbell.




































