Not Quite Joe Perry's Bass Line: Jackets 2 - Hawks 5
It was Perry who played the bass for "Back In The Saddle", not that doofus Tom Hamilton. That was on Rocks, the last good Aerosmith album Make fun of me if you must. Anyway, it wasn't quite back in the saddle, but after a mini dip any win was pretty welcome. While we all wanted to get to post some jungle drums here, that will have to wait for another time. It's a win, and feels even better after Scum getting fed by The Isle tonight. So much for that panic about being in fifth now, eh?
Bullets:
-It's funny to me that Sarah Kustok and her determined illustration of penetrating journalism, as well as the gaggle in the dressing room postgame, asked Viktor Stalberg why he has so much success against the Jackets. It's not a fucking secret. Their defense is slow and awful, as well as not all that physical. That combination is going to leave Stalberg a lot of space to exploit. I don't mean to be harsh on Stals, because he played well and has for a while now. But there's a reason he lights up Columbus but not other teams.
-Even in my jaded state at age 30, there's still something awesome about being in the building when the hats come raining down from the seats.
-As I thought, and so did many of you, the lines from the get-go were pretty much Liar's Dice. Stalberg stuck with DDN, but after that? Bolland saw most of his time with Hossa and Hayes, which looks to be a straight up scoring line. After that it's was anyone's guess. Which is fine for tonight.
-All the goals came from non-front line scorers. That will do nicely.
-Tonight was a great example of why the instigator rule is a tale told my an idiot. While my stance on fighting wavers back and forth almost on a daily basis, the NHL can't have it both ways. It's either in or it's out. Jared Boll's first attempted decapitation came against Andrew Brunette where he looked like he came from my selling spot on Madison. Montador stood up for that, and saw 19 minutes in penalties. But the thing is, a jackass like Boll knows he can pull stunts like this and whoever comes in to defend the honor is going to draw at least 17 minutes in penalties. It's a trade he'll make every time. While his hit on Hammer looked cleaner, I won't get haughty about Jammer stepping in. But again, 17 minutes. If players like Boll know that this is what their ruckus will cause, they will keep doing it. Either you're outlawing the players policing themselves, or you're letting them do it fully. The NHL should decide.
-Hey look, the Hawks do know where the quiet room is. Maybe it's only used for the captain.
-While I spent most of the Indian in tonight's issue talking about trades that would solve the Hawks holes, none of them said anything about goalie. Because really the only answer is to fix Crawford. And the two goals tonight were a result of rebounds causing a goalmouth scramble that involve Crow looking for his contact lens, or so it feels. Sure, Leddy and Keith were out there for both, and it's so easy to blame them. But they were two rebounds and scrambles that didn't have to happen .
-Rick Nash had nine shots. Sometimes he does care. I'm sure he will more when he's a Leaf.
It's a win. Let's just be happy with that, and save the supreme performance for when they are truly needed.
PLAYER OF THE GAME
229 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
OT question..
what do you suppose teams do with all those hats afterwards?
and Jared Boll is something that Rick Nash allegedly tucks..
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
I think I read once that
they give the player the chance to choose if he wants any (why someone would want another person’s sweaty hat is beyond me, but whatever) then donate them to charity.
by Katherine215 on Jan 11, 2012 12:03 AM CST up reply actions
that's nice
thanks!
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 12:09 AM CST up reply actions
that's exactly right
typically, the player grabs a handful or two for keepsakes, etc. The rest are picked up by AmVets for sale in one of their secondhand clothing stores.
by Gate3anuhHalf on Jan 11, 2012 12:16 AM CST up reply actions
forklift from Hockeenight
has the setup already.. http://hockeenight.com/2012/01/11/goodbye-old-friend-blackhawks-5-blue-jackets-2.aspx
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 12:24 AM CST up reply actions
reckon he'll be remorsefully scouring thrift stores next week?
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 12:26 AM CST up reply actions
Yup, they give 'em out
along with a blanket… and a box of RID.
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jan 11, 2012 10:44 AM CST up reply actions
i think Montreal or Boston...
Has a plexiglass tank that contains all the hats ever thrown in their arena. Pretty cool idea. Its huge. TWSS/
100% Blackhawks Blood.
by DaHawx on Jan 11, 2012 12:27 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
that's really cool
If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
by Timothy Fisher on Jan 11, 2012 12:49 AM CST up reply actions
I want to see the layer of construction helmet giveaways
From Toews hat trick… wait it got called off… okay he got another… HAT TRICK!!!
Afroman likes tall cans... of Daisy Cutter Pale Ale
by OMFS88 on Jan 11, 2012 7:24 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Devils goalies make 8 saves in Calgary
Flames with 6 goals on 14 shots
by CjSax on Jan 10, 2012 11:53 PM CST via mobile reply actions
6 G in 14 SOG ?
Now THAT’S a goalie controversy.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:21 AM CST up reply actions
Flames post game wrap was discussing the great effort...
Crazy… it was unfortunate goaltending first by Brodeur (2 goals on 5 shots) and then by Hedberg (4 goals on 9 shots). Funny thing is, Brodeur was pulled after the two goals but then Hedberg let in 2 goals on his next 3 shots (all in the first period).
Flames finished with a shot line (by period) of 8-3-3. Kipper finished with 35 saves and was electric in the 3rd (which I watched – while cheering for the Devils).
You are next.
Another shootout joke in TB
But this time the Ning are the victims
by CjSax on Jan 10, 2012 11:54 PM CST via mobile reply actions
what was it, a full stop?
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 12:08 AM CST up reply actions
Stop followed by spin
NHL network commentators both agreed that it was kind of a joke.
by CjSax on Jan 11, 2012 1:03 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
ugh, that is bs.
say what you want about the kane SO but he never stopped. I guess its too late to actually call a SO attempt where a player stops as being illegal since they deemed the first one as being ok.
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 1:23 AM CST up reply actions
How the fuck was that even remotely legal?
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 8:33 AM CST up reply actions
Hey!
Where’s the pic of the player of the game? I’ve been waiting since the end of the game for this!
or you could just google
“Viktor Stalberg nude and see what pops up. See what I did there?
by Kissmyanthia on Jan 11, 2012 12:07 AM CST up reply actions
here you go...

"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 12:12 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
haha this is pretty sweet.
skeletons don't like closets.
by Where Triples Go to Die on Jan 11, 2012 8:40 AM CST up reply actions
found it here
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 9:15 AM CST up reply actions
I'm not allowed to buy player apparel anymore.
They all get hurt when I wear it.
by Katherine215 on Jan 11, 2012 9:21 AM CST up reply actions
That's why I only wear jersey's of retired HOFers
Would have loved a Buff or a Nemo jersey in 2010. (Yeah, I like D, in any sport, I like D. Other kids daydreamed about MAKING the final shot, I daydreamed about Blocking the final shot).
Anyway. Buff’s a Jet and Nemo’s a Shark, so those Jerseys would be at the thrift shop now anyway. But Mikita, Hull, TonyO, Savard will ALWAYS be Hawks.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:25 AM CST up reply actions
hey
no shame in showing love for the goalie that won the cup. i rock my niemi 3rd jersey as a symbol of an era.
Nothing against Crow or Razer
And nothing against Stan, I agree with the decision.
But I miss Nemo. I like the kid.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 11:11 AM CST up reply actions
perhaps
the memory would best remain as the cup winner. because if he would’ve been around for last years team, he would’ve gotten lit up and we all would’ve been saying how bad it was to have kept him. just imagine the “sophomore slump” conversations that we would’ve been having.
according to the Atlantapeg Thrasjets, yes...
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 10:05 AM CST up reply actions
last night I saw a place
that still has Nick Boynton jerseys. They also had Sopel and Havlat
by pang off the post on Jan 11, 2012 11:15 AM CST up reply actions
Good lord
Why would they ever make Boynton jerseys in the first place? Sopel is questionable but I could see him having some kind of cult following
by WhySoSeriousCaptain on Jan 11, 2012 11:22 AM CST up reply actions
WIKTOR WIKTOR

for all you trek fans out there, the scene on youtube
by Raditzzzz on Jan 11, 2012 9:42 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
I did my own line juggling ....
with alcoholic brew tonight, I switched it up to Blue Moon to break this terrible slump. I also needed the vitamin c to fight this damn cold.
"Make the bastard chase you, he will follow."
by RaoulDuke27 on Jan 11, 2012 12:10 AM CST via Android app reply actions
Blue Moon=Hossa on Your Line
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 12:12 AM CST up reply actions
I agree.....
to me it’s Jeremy Roenick and his 6 point game vs Jets. I also love stouts which is a little weird for me.
"Make the bastard chase you, he will follow."
by RaoulDuke27 on Jan 11, 2012 12:16 AM CST via Android app up reply actions
Stout can be an acquired taste
But once acquired, nothing else satisfies.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:25 AM CST up reply actions
acquired, definitely
and wonderful too
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
Do you guys drink Kraftig?
I have also been indulging in that fairly recently.
"Make the bastard chase you, he will follow."
by RaoulDuke27 on Jan 11, 2012 11:15 AM CST via Android app up reply actions
a St Louis beer> Treachery!
just kidding.. don’t think it’s available over here (I’ve never seen it, anyway)
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 11:18 AM CST up reply actions
(Ducks for cover)
I was too lazy to go out and buy more Guinness, my buddy who I’m trying to convert into a Hawks fan had brought that over so I said what the hell. (Also hit the pregaming pretty hard)
"Make the bastard chase you, he will follow."
by RaoulDuke27 on Jan 11, 2012 11:24 AM CST via Android app up reply actions
go for
a dark lager if you want to make a transition to darker beers. i highly recommend kostritzer black lager (schwarzbier). you can pick up a 6er at binny’s. very drinkable especially when watching beerfest for the 1000th time.
Kostritzer is my all-time favorite
I spent a week in Bad Kostritz as an exchange student when I was 16 and got to tour the brewery. I only wish I could say my palate was refined enough to enjoy their scharzbier at the time, but I was strictly a Busch Light guy at the time. I like to think I’ve somewhat made up for it in the past 15 years.
Back in the Saddle
is Aerosmith’s finest hour. That bass line is mercilessly badass. You are spot-on.
Disciplina Praesidium Civitatis.
Curtis G. Sanford
And the G stands for fred mcGriff, rhymes with whiff, like his glove on Optimus’ improbable backhander.
Shaw needs to stick around to continue to demonstrate the ‘hockey check’.
Totally agree on instigator bullshit. wtf?
We like our people!
Curtis G Sanford...
sounds like he should be commanding a Confederate army.. or founding a small College…
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 12:25 AM CST up reply actions
Optimus?
I thought that was Ben Smith’s backhander…
by northernsails on Jan 11, 2012 1:13 AM CST up reply actions
you are correct
Dunno how he got his name, but I know his monikers are Optimus and BEN SMITH!!!
100% Blackhawks Blood.
by DaHawx on Jan 11, 2012 1:17 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I think that was Sopel
but it could have been Byfuglien
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 8:06 AM CST up reply actions
can anyone explain the visor thing???
Eddie o was talking bout some extra penalty time on monty because of some visor rule??
100% Blackhawks Blood.
by DaHawx on Jan 11, 2012 12:25 AM CST via mobile reply actions
meh
the idea is that it’s harder to land a punch on someone with a visor, so if you instigate while wearing one it’s an extra minor tacked on.
thats dumb.
100% Blackhawks Blood.
by DaHawx on Jan 11, 2012 12:28 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
uh huh
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 12:30 AM CST up reply actions
but thanks for the quick answer!
100% Blackhawks Blood.
by DaHawx on Jan 11, 2012 12:31 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I actually think it's a fair rule
Because you can mess your hand pretty bad by punching a visor. It gives an edge to the guy with the visor hence the additional penalty.
That being said, I still like that Monty went in there to defend Bruno. I think that’s good for the team’s chemistry and I like that the Hawks killed those instigator penalties.
by LavalPhantom on Jan 11, 2012 8:39 AM CST up reply actions
isn't it part of the "code"
that visor wearer flips his lid before engaging?
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 8:45 AM CST up reply actions
I think so.
Monty didn’t always wear a visor, I don’t think, so he probably just forgot to take it off.
by Katherine215 on Jan 11, 2012 9:11 AM CST up reply actions
It's also kinda difficult to just flip off your helmet
in a heat-of-the-moment exchange like that
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 9:13 AM CST up reply actions
Well, they flip off their gloves...
but I agree. I can just imagine Monty yelling, “You wanna go? Ok, wait just a minute while I take off my gloves and helmet and put them in a neat pile over here. Alright, I’m ready now.” Probably not going to work too well.
by Katherine215 on Jan 11, 2012 9:16 AM CST up reply actions
"hey, Kaner, can you mind these for me"
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 9:46 AM CST up reply actions
After the game
he said he did not know about that rule.
by stanfordron on Jan 11, 2012 12:45 PM CST up reply actions
That's great.
I do stuff for CheerTheAnthem
by HjammerTime on Jan 11, 2012 12:47 PM CST up reply actions
Seriously?
Jeez. Well, maybe having worn one so infrequently he never had to know. Or maybe he’s just a dope.
by Katherine215 on Jan 11, 2012 12:55 PM CST up reply actions
I call bullshit
all the league’s tough guys purposely don’t wear a visor and he didn’t know that part of the reason for this is a rule on visors? This seems very unlikely.
I get your point
but it is more of a rule about instigating than a rule about visors. Maybe he just skimmed it because he wasn’t expecting to be instigating. But, either way, not a great excuse.
It is on some degrees....
The best example I can think of is Brouwer and Iginla taking the helmets off before their dust up.
(Monday Night Miracle 2010)
"Make the bastard chase you, he will follow."
by RaoulDuke27 on Jan 11, 2012 9:23 AM CST via Android app up reply actions
Yep, I ripped open my hand for about a dozen stiches on a visor years ago.
Not good, they need to come off in a fight.
You are next.
this whole
“Giving up goals on a goalmouth scramble” thing we seem to be doing lately…
that’s fixable, right? Bueller?
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
i was thinking the exact thing tonight.
Oh here’s a scramble…aaaand….celebration….later on…scramble…aaaand goal…really guys…
100% Blackhawks Blood.
by DaHawx on Jan 11, 2012 12:55 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
You need to be excessively mean and violent to have any sustained success on scrambles
You also need your goalie to chose his spot carefully for when he pounces on the loose puck. If he times it wrong he opens himself up for easy put-ins. It’s definitely not one of our strengths at the moment.
You are next.
by M7 on Jan 11, 2012 1:01 PM CST up reply actions
I continue to think
that Hayes and Shaw look like real NHLers. But they’re very different.
Hayes looks like he’s trying to very conscientiously do what the coaches tell him to do. They tell him to get out there on the PP and stand in front of the net, that’s what he does. They tell him to use his size and be physical, so he tries to get a body on every check he makes. I like his attitude; he just gets to work and tries to fit in.
Shaw is like an overexcited little kid, and seems to get awfully wide-eyed when the puck comes his way. But he seems like a sharp enough fellow, and he tends to be where he’s supposed to be. The coaches seem to have a lot of trust in him already. If he settles down a little he might get good results pretty quickly.
I like watching them both, and I hope they manage to stick around.
Author of The Cubs Transaction Report
by Brian C on Jan 11, 2012 1:00 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
this.
I like both of them so far. I laughed my ass off when BEN SMITH! Scored. I said to my girlfriend “aww now the beats will have the streamer out tomorrow..” I love all the rooks
100% Blackhawks Blood.
by DaHawx on Jan 11, 2012 1:14 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
I had the same reaction
But Optimus needs to be the one sent down when Kruger gets back, because Hayes and Smith have made an impact in the games they’ve played. Smith’s (soft) goal was pretty much the only time I noticed him on the ice all night..
You mean Hayes and Shaw I assume?
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 10:27 AM CST up reply actions
yup, this exactly
they look like the belong at the big club.. as rookies, of course, with lots to learn. But from what I’ve seen so far I like the kids.. I guess we’re all careful not to go all Jesse Wuvs Ben (4TRU!) but I agree with your observations
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 1:31 AM CST up reply actions
Agree with both assesments.
Shaw just has a knack for generating opportunity to the net and he was killing power plays. Shaw was passed up in the last two drafts. Pretty amazing stuff.
Ver™
i thought Shaw played a good game
and has generally been good his entire time up with the big club, but there was at least one instance where his positioning led to a strong offensive push by Columbus. For some reason, with two Hawk players covering one Blue Jacket behind the Hawk’s goal, he decided to join in and make it a 3-1, which opened up the ice for the rest of the Columbus team once they gained possession of the puck.
Despite that, I’m glad both these guys have been solid additions. Very few mistakes, which is more than I could ever ask from even some seasoned vets * looking at Keith *.
Makes the future look bright
And makes you wonder if it makes Stan think one or two of his non core forwards can be trade bait.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:27 AM CST up reply actions
I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to see Stals and/or Frolik dangled as trade bait
but I would be surprised if that happens before at least one if not both of Sharp and Kruger are back in the line-up. As much as I’ve been pining for Stan to make a deal for a guy like Bobby Ryan, the fact of the matter is that the ‘Hawks offense is doing pretty damn good (outside of the clown shoes PP) and thus it’s probably more likely, and more prudent, to make a deal to shore up the back end. However, with 3 Rockford call-ups already in the line-up with Sharp, Kruger, and Carcillo all side-lined it just doesn’t seem likely (or like a good idea) that any forwards will be moved for defensive help anytime soon.
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 9:44 AM CST up reply actions
no on Stals I think
he’s progressing nicely, don’t see them letting him go at this point, particularly considering his current contract.
I agree that Stals is progressing nicely, I think he's been a pleasant surprise this season
But considering the depth the ‘Hawks have at forward, and how well some of the kids like Shaw and Hayes have been able to fit in and play with the big boys since getting the call-up, it seems like the most likely move for Stan between now and the deadline is to move a forward piece (or a couple of forwards) for defensive help. And what you’ve just said about Stalberg (which I agree with) – that he’s progressing nicely and has a great contact (> $1M AAV for this and next year) – is also what makes him the perfect trade bait. I’m by no means saying that I want to see Stals go anywhere, but he’d probably fetch a higher rate of return than anyone else the ‘Hawks might be willing to move and that’s important in these considerations as well
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 9:53 AM CST up reply actions
On the other hand there is the Sell High philosophy that Stan loves.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 11:12 AM CST up reply actions
I don't get Shaw, at all.
Quick, name every player drafted this year who has played in the NHL and was not drafted in the top ten.
You have Saad’s (#43) cup of coffee, and then way down in the 5th round (#139) you have Shaw. 5th-rounders never make the NHL in their draft year. What is going on?
No to mention lack of ice time in the Rock
Not sure if it changed recently, but I went to the Icehogs/Wolves game at Allstate back in October and Shaw barely played at all.
"I have only space enough to add: against the assault of desperate pandas nothing can stand."
-ChicoMaki (channeling Mark Twain)
by HungryHungryPanda on Jan 11, 2012 11:18 AM CST up reply actions
I think some guys game's translate better at the NHL level
Guys will come into the NHL with a very defined role and responsibilities. If a guy shows the willingness to do that, he translates well. Roles in junior and the A are much less defined.
You are next.
by M7 on Jan 11, 2012 1:06 PM CST up reply actions
Was he injured? For some reason I thought he was part of the time in the Rock but may be confusing him with another player
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 2:21 PM CST up reply actions
At a minimum, hopefully the arrival of Shaw and Hayes
make Bickell give you that look your dog gives you the first week you bring a new dog home.
If you watch the Stalberg Hat Trick video
On his first goal, at the very beginning, you can clearly Kane call out to Toews for the puck, “Tazer! Hey!”
I don’t know why I was so amused by that other than how clear it was on the recording.
i can recall kaner getting setup
3 times tonight in the slot and not firing a shot. Maybe toews said screw it and passed to Stalz haha
100% Blackhawks Blood.
by DaHawx on Jan 11, 2012 1:16 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Tazer did actually pass it to Kane though on that one - he was the primary assist.
I thought Kane and Toews set each other and Stals up very nicely a few times, only for it to not go in the net >:(
A game or two ago there were a few times when Kane was wide open and banging his stick on the ice, and nobody passed to him =(
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 1:22 AM CST up reply actions
could it just be that he lost some/more flexibility and hasn't gained it back still?
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 10:33 AM CST up reply actions
Could just be he didn't want to shoot. Who knows.
I do stuff for CheerTheAnthem
by HjammerTime on Jan 11, 2012 10:35 AM CST up reply actions
yeah could be anything
i doubt it’ll last though
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 2:22 PM CST up reply actions
Haha, i heard that during the game
I love when you can hear the players on ice. My favorite of course is “fuck you alberts!”
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 1:24 AM CST up reply actions
"Alleged" weiner-tucker
I almost got in trouble for not including the precursor the other day. He’s not yet been convicted in the court of weiner-tucking yet. Just accused.
by JesusMarianHossa on Jan 11, 2012 9:02 AM CST up reply actions
I was just trying to keep you OUT of trouble
wouldn’t want you sued for libel, that’s why you gotta added the “allegedly”. Purported also works.
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 9:05 AM CST up reply actions
his case goes to trial
about the same time as FCAB….
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 9:07 AM CST up reply actions
did you hear the game vs the stars at the UC (second game of the season)?
At the very end you hear someone on the ice shouting “FUCK YOU MONTADOR, HEY HEY, MONTA-FUCK YOU MONTADOR!”
and is there a youtube link for the “fuck you alberts” one?
by putmeinthemadhouse on Jan 11, 2012 2:49 AM CST up reply actions
I didn't hear that! but now I must find it
i wish there was, but haven’t found it yet
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 9:45 AM CST up reply actions
This is the best on ice taunt ever recorded IMO
Turn the volume up as it’s not very easy to hear… although it is definitely NSFW.
You are next.
by M7 on Jan 11, 2012 1:11 PM CST up reply actions
will def. check it out when i get home,!
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 2:22 PM CST up reply actions
Check out Vik's 2nd goal
Nintendo nudges the puck, partially screens the defender, then tucks his left skate back to (barely) avoid blocking the shot. A Swedish thing of beauty.
We like our people!
that must have
gone against every instinct in TOFTBO’s body… “Must Block Puuuuck!!”
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 2:44 AM CST up reply actions
Of all the things caught by microphones on the field of play
by JesusMarianHossa on Jan 11, 2012 9:04 AM CST up reply actions
Wow, he sounds exactly like Tom Hanks.
I do stuff for CheerTheAnthem
by HjammerTime on Jan 11, 2012 11:00 AM CST up reply actions
Well played Hawks.
I had to meet friends for dinner so I didn’t get to see the third period, but I’m going to watch it now as I fall asleep.
Great to see them take 2 points in a game they should have.
Keep it up!
Blackhawks bleed Red & White.
We are all Canucks...including Toews, Sharp, Keith, Seabrook, ...need I go on?
What's more quiet?
Captain Serious in the quiet room or the icy cold of outer space?
by pang off the post on Jan 11, 2012 7:31 AM CST reply actions
The icy cold of outer space obviously
a robot’s processor’s make a muted but barely audible sound whereas in outer space there can be no sound at all
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 8:10 AM CST up reply actions
see, that's rubbish
they say sound doesn’t travel in a vacumn but I’ve just been hoovering and the noise scared the shit out of the dog….
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 8:47 AM CST up reply actions
hehehe
see, there’s the problem with your comprehension – there’s a difference between sound (not) traveling through a vacuum and sound being created by a vacuum. It has to do with quantum field states and wave functions, all very technical
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 8:50 AM CST up reply actions
I think comprehension
is a problem with me, full stop..
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 8:59 AM CST up reply actions
don't be so hard on yourself mmD
you comprehend the important things, like the necessity of daily whiskey intake and fuck scum
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 9:03 AM CST up reply actions
Dr. Emmett Brown is that you?
"Make the bastard chase you, he will follow."
by RaoulDuke27 on Jan 11, 2012 10:12 AM CST via Android app up reply actions
shhhh you'll blow my cover
now all we need is for the Marlins to move to the AL ASAP so that the Cubs can beat them in the 2015 world series…
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 10:29 AM CST up reply actions
if something go boom in space, it makes a sound.
Amendation of “If a tree falls in space…”
by northernsails on Jan 11, 2012 1:36 PM CST up reply actions
Captain serious in the quiet room
Residual radiation from the big bang makes a little static noise.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:29 AM CST up reply actions
good point on the instigator rule, Fels
I was thinking the same thing last night but what’s the solution? It’s not like the instigator rule is a bad one, but it can become counterproductive in staving off injuries and keeping the game clean as currently structures.
I disagree, the instigator rule IS a bad one
On paper it seems like a good idea, someone starts a needless fight slap him with an extra 2 and 10 on top of the 5. However, in practice all it does is encourage worthless sacks of human excrement like Jared Boll to keep being pieces of shit because they know they can take runs at guys and lay people out with borderline-to-flat-out-dirty hits and if anyone responds they’ll also get a PP for their team. Despite being apparently missed by the refs both of the hits in question were dirty – he left his feet both times, and on Hammer he clearly got his hands WAY up – yet when Monty and then Jammer did the right thing and stood up for their teammates to show that that sort of shit wouldn’t be tolerated the BJ’s ended up getting a power play. Sam is absolutely right, you can’t have it both ways – you can’t allow players to police themselves by keeping fighting in the game but then slap on extra penalty minutes when they do just that. The instigator rule is complete and utter garbage
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 8:47 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
the rule never has made any sense
which is why I don’t think they call it all that often – even the refs know it’s bullshit.
except for, you know, the 2 times they called it last night
and when they called it on Fluffy for pounding Engelland into a bloody pulp after he concussed The Plan All Along
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 8:56 AM CST up reply actions
I feel we've been on the wrong side of it more often than not.
by LavalPhantom on Jan 11, 2012 9:11 AM CST up reply actions
The rule makes sense
IF you accept as a given that the refs don’t miss calls, and the players don’t need to do any old school self discipline. In other words if you don’t actually watch hockey
So yeah, the rule makes no sense in it’s present form.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:11 AM CST up reply actions 2 recs
The refs need to use more judgment in applying it (so we're screwed)
If a guy drops the gloves to start a fight for no apparent reason, use the rule. If a guy is coming to the aid of a team mate after a big hit (legal or not), use some discretion. Or: in my dream world of perfect justice, check the replay to see if you missed anything Mister Zebra
“Well, I totally missed that boarding call. I can’t enforce it based on replay, but I’m NOT going to call anything but coincidental minors for the resultant clock cleaning.”
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:09 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Agree totally
Not to mention the complete and utter lack of consistency in which it is called.
Last night Iginla got rocked by Adam Henrique. Glencross first went after Henrique but was then intercepted by Iginla (always one to fight his own fights). Anyways… no instigator on Iginla. Huh? What am I missing? I should mention that Glencross did get called for unsportsmanlike conduct (2 min) but really Iggy should’ve gotten an extra 2 and a 10 if they were calling it by the letter of the law.
You are next.
by M7 on Jan 11, 2012 1:17 PM CST up reply actions
Getting rid of the instigator solves one problem but just opens up another.
If there’s no instigator a tough guy can just go beat up your little guy for no reason. Shitbags like Bieksa will go punch whoever he wants once he gets pissy and wants a five minute rest. The result isn’t necessarily better it’s just different from the current bad situation.
I believe Mark Grace had a word for these...
The Columbus Blue Jackets are officially the slump buster of the NHL.
by JesusMarianHossa on Jan 11, 2012 8:56 AM CST reply actions
Auntie Ahn banned my last picture trying to describe this concept...
…I can re-post if anyone wants to see it?
No Swagger, No Dagger
I strongly advise against this
as I bravely, and stupidly, googled it as you directed.
But in the end, I think it's going to come back to the Globetrotters, because if there's one thing they know, it's "globe-trotting!"
Ah, brave you are, and now enlightened also...
No Swagger, No Dagger
by Saskjet on Jan 11, 2012 10:20 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
5 goals in secondary scoring.
Okay it’s the BJ’s, and okay, some of these guys MAY have been temporarily playing on the top two lines due to injuries. Maybe Stals will stay there,
BUT it ’s 5 goals in one game from guys NOT wearing 19, 88, 10, or 81.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:05 AM CST reply actions
OT: I will be in town tomorrow and wanted to get to the Wild game, but Weather.com makes it seem like a blizzard approaches...
(1) Can I get last minute tix online assuming I can get there through the weather?
(2) Is the weather going to be that bad?
Thanks
No Swagger, No Dagger
Let's go to Ollie Williams with the weather report!
IZ GON SNOW!
by JesusMarianHossa on Jan 11, 2012 9:11 AM CST up reply actions
So the roads are clear but the buildings are covered?
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 1:27 PM CST up reply actions
If you're flying in you should be fine
So long as you have an early flight. If your flight is scheduled to land sometime after noon, you could be in trouble.
by JesusMarianHossa on Jan 11, 2012 9:16 AM CST up reply actions
it was first forecast for a dusting
then went up to 2 inches, now they’re in full scream mode (as per usual) – I doubt it will be that difficult, but knowing O’Hare I’d plan on a possible 2 – hour delay of any flights tomorrow.
no just the usual overreaction by our breathless weatherpeople
you know they’re way too bored with this winter after the last four, which were all much colder than usual and much snowier. So they gotta spike those ratings and strike when the oven’s hot, so to speak. I’m old enough to remember when a few inches of snow didn’t make everyone on the local TV newcasts start frothing at the mouth and warning of eternal hellfire. Really embarrassing – hey, this is Chicago, guess what? It gets cold in the winter! And guess what else? It snows as well – sometimes a lot!
a friend from Chicago
told me about “Lake Effect Snow”.. which sounds like fun!
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 9:55 PM CST up reply actions
The weather is NEVER as bad as weather.com says it will be
Don’t know what to tell you about tix.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:12 AM CST up reply actions
Not sure about how your flight will be affected
but if it is pretty snowy, I’d bet you can get cheap tickets a few hours before the game on Ticket Exchange. There was a game I think in 2010 that tickets were going for super cheap because it had snowed during the day and no one wanted to make the trip to the UC.
Normally, I’d say buy in advance, but if it does snow, I’d watch Ticket Exchange and see if prices fall.
by Katherine215 on Jan 11, 2012 9:20 AM CST up reply actions
Or, many tickets are available electronicly for you to download and print yourself
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 9:34 AM CST up reply actions
Tony Gallagher gets embarrassed.
I do stuff for CheerTheAnthem
by HjammerTime on Jan 11, 2012 9:11 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Hating the Canucks
His comments are hilarious about not understanding why the Nucks are hated. But but how can anyone hate us when we are a bunch of pussies??
by WhySoSeriousCaptain on Jan 11, 2012 10:22 AM CST up reply actions
My PD comment (yeah, I went there)
NO FAIR!!! Comcast made Tony Gallagher argue with two guys in the same segment! This is surely a breech of the unwritten sportswriter ethical code.
And how much do those guys’ brains weigh??
Wow. Just. Wow. Tony Gallagher got me to like a Bruin, outside of Chara and Thomas?? That’s impressive! And his whining at the end there was the best. “Why doesn’t anybody like us?? C’mon, EVERYBODY loved Anthony Michael Hall in ‘Pretty In Pink’!”
One day they’ll make a movie regarding the naivety and delusion surrounding everything Nucks. Michael Keaton, a la “Multiplicity” Dougs #2 and #4, can play the twins.
I’m just not sure how they’ll be able to cast Sally Field as the remainder of the organization and its affiliates? Plus, that’s a lot of crying scenes!
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jan 11, 2012 10:56 AM CST up reply actions
"You hate me, you really hate me"
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 11:00 AM CST up reply actions
BUT
Anthony Michael Hall was not in Pretty in Pink.
Sixteen Candles, Breakfast Club, and Weird Science yes.
Hold My Stones
actually, it was a P Diddy comment..
..so he had to have an error/rampant bigotry/insane homerism in there somewhere just to blend in. CNS chose the lesser of the evils..
"Kevin, You can't play Doom Metal while wearing a scarf"
by mightymike D on Jan 11, 2012 1:13 PM CST up reply actions
It's my own fault for ending up there...
I followed a few links and ended up reading a blogger’s reaction from the Province here. Reader be warned…
I might be accused of panic and have things thrown at me
But does anyone else think it’s possible the Penguins don’t make the playoffs? They are currently a +370 payout if they don’t. Asking for a friend, of course. And for entertainment purposes only.
Don’t gamble on sports kids.
/eye twinkle
by JesusMarianHossa on Jan 11, 2012 9:18 AM CST reply actions
It's certainly possible that they end up on the outside looking in
They’re currently sitting in the 8 spot, and while they caught a lucky break that James Neal’s injury ended up not being as severe as initially feared they’re still without Crosby, Letang, and Staal and there’s no indication that any of them are returning anytime soon. One more key injury to a guy like say Malkin or Fleury and they could be in some really deep shit. On the other hand, Bylsma is a crazy good coach and I see more teams ahead of them that I think stand a decent chance of faltering (Ottawa, New Jersey, and possibly Toronto) than teams currently behind them that I think stand a good chance of picking it up and making the postseason (Washington is the only one). So yeah, it’s possible, and with those odds it wouldn’t be terrible to put a little money down but I wouldn’t bet the farm on it.
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 9:33 AM CST up reply actions
I mean, Malkin appears to be the only one trying anymore
A Russian! A RUSSIAN IS THE ONLY ONE TRYING! What is the world coming to?!?
by JesusMarianHossa on Jan 11, 2012 9:43 AM CST up reply actions
Hey Sam
Belated thanks for the Helmet last night to lead off the by period threads. Always nice for an old codger like myself to recognize one of the offerings.
by GenPabloSecobar on Jan 11, 2012 9:30 AM CST reply actions
They are banged the hell up
But they have some character. And they play in the east. If they played in the west, I’d say they are in trouble, but the east is weak after the first two or three teams.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:31 AM CST reply actions
Oops, the above re the pens not making the playoffs.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 9:31 AM CST up reply actions
Crow needs to get un-fucked quickly
Rebound control is just terrible, and it exposes the Hawks’ undersized Dmen like Leddy and Keith.
"I have only space enough to add: against the assault of desperate pandas nothing can stand."
-ChicoMaki (channeling Mark Twain)
by HungryHungryPanda on Jan 11, 2012 9:42 AM CST reply actions
Somebody on another site referred to it as...
…“his now classic hungry, hungry hippos routine.” That makes me laugh (although it should probably make me cry).
by bluekoolaide on Jan 11, 2012 9:49 AM CST up reply actions
Earlier in the year, the Campbell trade looked great
Leddy was flying around and doing everything Campbell did, and wasn’t asked to play with much physicality. This was back when Crow was playing around last year’s numbers (.914 and 2.38 in October).
With Crow doing the hippo routine, Leddy is being exposed (much like Campbell would be if he were here).
"I have only space enough to add: against the assault of desperate pandas nothing can stand."
-ChicoMaki (channeling Mark Twain)
by HungryHungryPanda on Jan 11, 2012 9:53 AM CST up reply actions
What I don't know about being an NHL goalie, you could probably cram into the...
…Hollywood Bowl. But, based on my extremely unexpert analysis, that seems like something that could be fixed with a little bit of focus. It better get fixed because a goalie who gets the yips every time a puck is loose in the crease isn’t going to be around for very long.
by bluekoolaide on Jan 11, 2012 10:12 AM CST up reply actions
i don't know
goal mouth scrambles fall low on my scale of goalie issues. imo, getting away from a scramble around the net depends about as much on the defense as it does the goalie for me. he made two initial saves on that second goal, if you keep it out 2ce, and your d can’t clear it, then there are more problems then just not being able to cover it up.
i would be much more concerned if the goals crow let in looked like that smith backhander on sanford. oh wait, ben eager just did that…
Some rebounds should be directed to the corner rather than in front
However, I agree with what you say here.
Make the 1st save right?
Hold My Stones
that is something i wrestle with
as far as a goaltending philosophy is concerned. the goal is to “control” the puck, not just stop it. but i simply don’t believe you can do that in all situations at the nhl level. that’s when you have to make an initial stop and give your best effort from there (both as a goalie and collectively as a team defense).
it doesn’t sit well as a response to certain goals, but i just can’t really get around it.
it should be noted that Nemo was quite a reboundo machine at times
Other than the series vs. the Sharks, he gave up a ton of really juicy rebounds – so I’m not too concerned about it either.
Kane is really fighting it
It was apparent on TV, but seeing it in person last night was eye opening. He got to spots he would normally shoot from, had the lane to fire and always tried to make one extra move. The extra move ended it every time as he lost control of the puck or a BJ caught up and poked it away. He’s still making some great passes (the dish to Stalberg for his 1st was beautiful), but he needs to regain some of that sniper form.
by WhySoSeriousCaptain on Jan 11, 2012 10:16 AM CST reply actions
And
his clean shot from the crease after Captain’s pass on the 2 on 1 that just dribbled toward the goal was embarrassing.
by stanfordron on Jan 11, 2012 12:56 PM CST up reply actions
tazer did the same but i can't remember if it was before or after he got his head knocked
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 2:25 PM CST up reply actions
This crap about goalmouth scrambles and rebound control
Is starting to aggravate. Crawford, again, is a blocking goalie. He’s big, uses his size and positioning, etc. Nemo gave up worse rebounds than Crow (couldn’t catch the puck to save his life, for starters), but he used his fairly porky but flexible lower body to block all the bottom of the net, while Crow plays it a bit more conventionally. Combine that with the fact that Leddy/Hjalmarsson (or Leddy/Keith) is one of the least physically difficult pairs to play against, and that’s a recipe for a lot of rough goals.
Craw played fine last night. Goalmouth concerns are a combination of rebound control, crappy D, and a down-low forward not doing his job, not just Craw’s fault.
And fuck Jared Boll. I remember playing with him in Peewees and Bantams, I was shocked when he became a goon. But he’s milking his Scott-esque minutes with cheapshots and fights now.
by DCJintsFan on Jan 11, 2012 10:21 AM CST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
A "blocking" goalie? I have never heard this term
At any rate, Crow had great numbers last year and in October of this year with the same cast of characters in the top 4 (Campbell > Leddy but not by much) and a much stronger 3rd pair.
"I have only space enough to add: against the assault of desperate pandas nothing can stand."
-ChicoMaki (channeling Mark Twain)
by HungryHungryPanda on Jan 11, 2012 10:26 AM CST up reply actions
blocking type
goalie refers to his primary style relying more on his size, positioning and a systematic executional approach to the butterfly. in the modern nhl, it becomes more splitting of hairs when comparing tenders approach, because they all rely on that style, but there are some notable tenders who are more unotrthodox than others.
niemi is an excellent example of a more unorthodox/athletic type, imo also brodeur (maybe a little less on the athletic side these days…). on the other spectrum, giguere (an Allaire trained goalie) is heavily blocking type versus “athletic/individualistic” type. belfour is an excellent example of someone who started as a more athletic/reflex goalie, but turned into a more conventional blocking type goalie as a way to extend his career and continue to compete at a high level.
I understand the difference between butterfly and the more athletic style
But saying someone is a “blocking” goalie and therefore is expected to give up lots of bad rebounds is just strange to me.
Rebounds aren’t always bad, so I’m not buying that Crow’s “style” is to intentionally put a tons of pucks in front of himself in the crease.
I’ll buy “blocking” style if those rebounds are directed to the corners, but they’re not.
"I have only space enough to add: against the assault of desperate pandas nothing can stand."
-ChicoMaki (channeling Mark Twain)
by HungryHungryPanda on Jan 11, 2012 10:46 AM CST up reply actions
you can
put it in those terms and make it sound very unappealing, but some facts just remain. I want to say to you, yes you are right, we shouldn’t expect bad rebounds just because a goalie uses a primarily blocking type style.
but unfortunately, there is no magical way a puck will not become a rebound if it hits goal pads when in the butterfly UNLESS you can get a stick on it, its the physics of the pad surface creating a 90 degree angle along the ice surface (and to another degree where the shot comes from).
the only real way you can control the puck is using the stick directionally. and because, imo, you can’t always get your stick on it, and most goalies employ the bfly to stop a majority of shots, you indeed should believe that this style will be putting bad rebounds into play. intentional or not.
Blocking Goalie
As opposed to a goaltender who hangs back in his crease and relies on reflexes (e.g, Lundqvist) or true hybrid/wild-cards (Brodeur, Thomas), as opposed to the classic Quebec Roy-plus style, which is very much based on size, positioning, and the butterfly technique. (Francois Allaire’s empire) Giguere, Luongo, Crawford, and a whole host of guys who never quite made it. In fact, the Quebecers as a whole haven’t really done than great since the lockout, and the guys who have – Luongo (I know we hate him but still), Theodore, maybe Crow – have added a hybrid element to their game, but still remain blocking goalies.
As far as Crow in particular, the reason his numbers have tanked since October that are his fault have less to do with his scrambles and rebound control ability and more to do with softies like Ben Eager backhands, overcommitting on some plays (both Phoenix games), and puck-fighting struggles (the goals that sneak through him). I’m worried about those far more than the rebound control.
by DCJintsFan on Jan 11, 2012 10:57 AM CST via mobile up reply actions
Got it
This explanation makes more sense. I was getting hung up on the word “blocking” since it’s any goalies responsibility to “block” the puck.
"I have only space enough to add: against the assault of desperate pandas nothing can stand."
-ChicoMaki (channeling Mark Twain)
by HungryHungryPanda on Jan 11, 2012 11:14 AM CST up reply actions
seems to be a theme, no?
There are three types of people in this world: those who can count, and those who can't.
by FrankStallone on Jan 11, 2012 10:36 AM CST up reply actions
Yep, his last 2 games have been impressive
And last night was the first time I’ve noticed him below the goal line in the offensive zone in I don’t know how long.
by ChicagoNativeSon on Jan 11, 2012 11:03 AM CST up reply actions
For some reason Hossa gets a lot of attention
Funny, Hossa is younger than Datsyuk and has about 200 more goals. That contract really sucks.
Hold My Stones
doesn't everyone look good with Hossa?
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 1:29 PM CST up reply actions
Sam,
you don’t look 30.
My serenity is inversely proportional to my expectations.
LET’S GO HAWKS!!!!!
So crawford stops 32 of 34 shots and we are blaming him?
If you think crawford was bad tonight than it is time to get those expectations back to a realistic level, he is not patrick roy!
Sometimes with traffic goalies give up rebounds, it happens. Crawford was fine tonight.
In some cities they make excuses for their team when they aren't playing well
In Chicago, we want a 5-0 6-0 7-0 an 8 to (-3) win every game, or we bitch. We don’t need a reason, it’s what we do.
Most detractors don’t want Crow gone, they like the kid and want him to continue to improve.
This is my haiku
It is only three lines long
Thanks for reading it
by Sparky The Barbarian on Jan 11, 2012 1:32 PM CST up reply actions
It would be nice if our goalies would "steal a game."
Hasn’t happened often. Has happened a number of times against us.
My serenity is inversely proportional to my expectations.
LET’S GO HAWKS!!!!!
I don't need my goalies to steal a game
I want the rest of my team to score enough that we don’t need to rely on that. I want my D to stop the pucks from getting to my goalie. I want my heart to quit racing when there is a scramble in front of the net and we are only up by one goal (because you know the shithead other team is going to score to tie it up before the end of the 3rd).
SCH moderator (may the force be with me) and tweets @tivogoddess
so really you don't WANT to need your goalie to steal a game
but sometimes you have to.
"Well now you're just talking like Foghorn Leghorn!"
by justforkicks on Jan 11, 2012 2:28 PM CST up reply actions
well, we won the game
and our “secondary” scorers scored, so…
SOMEONE MUST BE BLAMED.
SCH Narc - check yo'self before you wreck yo'self.
Alrighty no one else mentioned this so...
It’s funny to me that Sarah Kustok and her determined illustration of penetrating journalism, as well as the gaggle in the dressing room postgame, asked Viktor Stalberg why he has so much success against the Jackets. It’s not a fucking secret. Their defense is slow and awful, as well as not all that physical. That combination is going to leave Stalberg a lot of space to exploit. I don’t mean to be harsh on Stals, because he played well and has for a while now. But there’s a reason he lights up Columbus but not other teams.
Really man? If that’s the case why didn’t anyone else score? Why haven’t Toews Sharp and Hoss scored like 20 goals each against the BJs? He’s just a Columbus killer and he’s done well against them, you’re completely belittling his achievements, with a sketchy at best reason.
Curator of Dark Side of the Five Hole
I like our guys, especially these guys.
Unapologetic apologist for hockey South of the Mason/Dixon
He's getting his shots against everyone.
They are just going in against the BJs a lot more than they are going in against other teams. Sounds like a different explanation is necessary.
answer
I think this is a good explanation:
Their defense is slow and awful, as well as not all that physical. That combination is going to leave Stalberg a lot of space to exploit.
Since Stals is the fastest skater on the team, and also much more easily pushed off the puck than the Hawks’ elite forwards (though he’s gotten better lately), it stands to reason that he would benefit more from playing a slow, soft D than some other Hawks forwards. It’s the same principle as when certain players dominate in the minors but can’t quite cut it in the NHL.
Of course, it could also be a small sample-size fluke.
Author of The Cubs Transaction Report
I told a friend who went to the game
that they had to yell “Rick Nash is a wiener tucker” audibly enough for him to hear, but that wiener tucker still got off 9 shots.
Plus he’s good at punching people, Burke!
light em up

by 




























