x

Already member? Login first!

Comments / New

Prosecutors announce Patrick Kane won’t face criminal charges in rape case

Patrick Kane will not face criminal charges after a lengthy investigation into rape allegations against the Chicago Blackhawks star was found to be “rife with reasonable doubt,” the Erie County District Attorney’s office announced Thursday.

Kane had been under investigation since a woman reported to police in early August that she had been raped by the 26-year-old at his offseason home in New York. Authorities have since investigated the allegations, including taking evidence from Kane’s home and interviewing various parties involved in the case.

However, the DA’s office under Frank A. Sedita III has now laid out its reasoning for why criminal charges could not be filed against Kane. The press release states that “there are significant material inconsistencies between the complainant’s accounts and those of other witnesses.”

The release also points out that the alleged victim decided to stop cooperating with authorities and signed a “non-prosecution affidavit” citing stress. This was one of many factors that led the DA’s office to opt not to pursue charges against Kane.

It’s still possible that the woman brings forth a civil lawsuit against Kane. The burden of proof in civil cases is lower than that of criminal ones.

Here is the full press release from the Erie County DA’s office:

Erie County District Attorney Frank A. Sedita, III announces the following.

The Town of Hamburg Police Department and the Office of the Erie County District Attorney have conducted an exhaustive investigation over the course of the past three months regarding allegations made by a 21 year-old woman that 26 year-old Patrick Kane raped her on his bed. The investigative findings include the following:

  • There are significant material inconsistencies between the complainant’s accounts and those of other witnesses.
  • The DNA results lend no corroboration whatsoever to the complainant’s claim of penetration, a required element of proof for a rape charge.
  • The physical evidence and the forensic evidence, when viewed in tandem, tend to contradict the complainant’s claim that she was raped on Kane’s bed.
  • Although Kane has exercised his constitutional right to remain silent (which prohibits questioning by law enforcement), he has made no known incriminating statements to any civilian, nor has he engaged in any conduct consistent with a consciousness of guilt.

Additionally, the complainant, after consultation with her attorney, has decided that she does not wish to go forward with a criminal prosecution. She has recently signed what is commonly referred to as a “Non-Prosecution Affidavit” that states, in relevant part: “That after fully discussing all the circumstances with my attorney, I have decided I do not wish to criminally prosecute the charges which stem out of this investigation. I do so of my own free will and without any promises or compensation.”

A complainant’s willingness or reluctance to go forward is an important factor in determining whether a criminal prosecution, brought by this office on behalf of the People of the State of New York, will go forward. It is not, however, decisive. In other words, a complainant’s allegations, standing alone, do not trigger a criminal prosecution; nor does a complainant’s wish to withdraw charges, standing alone, determine whether a criminal case will be terminated.

Our prosecution standard is proof-based and has been stated on many occasions: consistent with the discretion afforded to the District Attorney under the law, we prosecute when the credible evidence, likely admissible in court, proves a crime was committed and proves the accused committed it.

The totality of the credible evidence — the proof — does not sufficiently substantiate the complainant’s allegation that she was raped by Patrick Kane and this so-called “case” is rife with reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the Office of the Erie County District Attorney will not present this matter to an Erie County Grand Jury.

A confidential correspondence has been sent to the Town Hamburg Police Chief (with copies forwarded to legal counsel for the complainant and Mr. Kane), setting forth in greater detail the investigative findings and the reasons for the decision not to criminally prosecute this matter.

The District Attorney will not be holding a press conference.

Talking Points